Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes in Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve

被引:5
|
作者
Hecht, Sebastien [1 ]
Zenses, Anne-Sophie [1 ]
Bernard, Jeremy [1 ]
Tastet, Lionel [1 ]
Cote, Nancy [1 ]
Guimaraes, Leonardo de Freitas Campos [1 ]
Paradis, Jean-Michel [1 ]
Beaudoin, Jonathan [1 ]
O'Connor, Kim [1 ]
Bernier, Mathieu [1 ]
Dumont, Eric [1 ]
Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri [1 ]
Delarochelliere, Robert [1 ]
Mohammadi, Siamak [1 ]
Clavel, Marie-Annick [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ]
Salaun, Erwan [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Laval Univ, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Aortic bioprosthesis; Redo; -surgery; Structural valve deterioration; Transcatheter valve -in -valve; PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH; END-POINT DEFINITIONS; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN SOCIETY; IMPLANTATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDATIONS; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.shj.2022.100106
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to redo-surgical aortic valve replacement (Redo-SAVR) for the treatment of failed surgical aortic bioprostheses. However, the benefit of ViV-TAVR compared with Redo-SAVR remains debated with regard to short-term hemodynamic results and short-and long-term clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare short-term hemodynamic performance and long-term clinical outcomes of ViV-TAVR vs. Redo-SAVR in patients treated for surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve failure. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data prospectively collected in 184 patients who underwent Redo-SAVR or ViV-TAVR. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and after the procedure and analyzed in an echocardiography core laboratory using the new Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. An inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to compare the outcomes between both procedures. Results: ViV-TAVR showed lower rate of intended hemodynamic performance (39.2% vs. 67.7%, p < 0.001) at 30 days, which was essentially driven by a higher rate (56.2% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.001) of high residual gradient (mean transvalvular gradient >= 20 mm Hg). Despite a trend for higher 30-day mortality in the Redo-SAVR vs. ViV-TAVR group (8.7% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 3.70 [0.77-17.6]; p = 0.10), the long-term mortality was significantly lower (24.2% vs. 50.1% at 8 years; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.48 [0.26-0.91]; p = 0.03) in the Redo-SAVR group. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, Redo-SAVR remained significantly associated with reduced long-term mortality compared with ViV-TAVR (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.32 [0.22-0.46]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: ViV-TAVR was associated with a lower rate of intended hemodynamic performance and numerically lower mortality at 30 days but higher rates of long-term mortality compared with Redo-SAVR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses
    Silaschi, Miriam
    Wendler, Olaf
    Seiffert, Moritz
    Castro, Liesa
    Lubos, Edith
    Schirmer, Johannes
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Schaefer, Ulrich
    Treede, Hendrik
    MacCarthy, Philip
    Conradi, Lenard
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 24 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [22] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A look at outcomes
    Mendoza, Cesar E.
    Rivera, Hector
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (12) : 4389 - 4390
  • [23] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes
    Thandra, Abhishek
    Abusnina, Waiel
    Jhand, Aravdeep
    Shaikh, Kashif
    Bansal, Raahat
    Pajjuru, Venkata S.
    Al-Abdouh, Ahmad
    Kanmanthareddy, Arun
    Alla, Venkata M.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 97 (07) : 1481 - 1488
  • [24] Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes After Surgical Redo Mitral Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Therapy
    Kamioka, Norihiko
    Babaliaros, Vasilis
    Morse, Michael Andrew
    Frisoli, Tiberio
    Lerakis, Stamatios
    Iturbe, Jose Miguel
    Binongo, Jose
    Corrigan, Frank
    Yousef, Altayyeb
    Gleason, Patrick
    Wells, John A.
    Caughron, Hope
    Dong, Andy
    Rodriguez, Evelio
    Leshnower, Bradley
    O'Neill, William
    Paone, Gaetano
    Eng, Marvin
    Guyton, Robert
    Block, Peter C.
    Greenbaum, Adam
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (12) : 1131 - 1138
  • [25] Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Jahangiri, Marjan
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 116 (04): : 767 - 767
  • [26] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
    Hutt, Erika
    Mehra, Nandini
    Desai, Milind Y.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2022, 20 (12) : 911 - 918
  • [27] Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rad, Arian Arjomandi
    Naruka, Vinci
    Vardanyan, Robert
    Salmasi, Mohammad Yousuf
    Tasoudis, Panagiotis T.
    Kendall, Simon
    Casula, Roberto
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (11) : 3743 - 3753
  • [28] Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the management of failed biological prosthesis: early and late outcomes
    Tam, D.
    Dharma, C.
    Wijeysundera, H. C.
    Austin, P.
    Ouzounian, M.
    Rocha, R. V.
    Fremes, S. E.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 22 - 22
  • [29] Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Abbas, Amr E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 1516 - 1517
  • [30] Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Raschpichler, Matthias
    De Waha-Thiele, Suzanne
    Holzhey, David
    Schwarzer, Guido
    Kaewkes, Danon
    Brauchle, Paul
    Dvir, Danny
    Makkar, Raj
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Thiele, Holger
    Borger, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (19) : B142 - B143