Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery

被引:26
|
作者
Zhao, Ying-Li [1 ]
Mackenzie, M.
Kirkby, C. [1 ]
Fallone, B. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Cross Canc Inst, Dept Med Phys, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Phys, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
关键词
tomotherapy; Monte Carlo; convolution/superposition; TPS verification;
D O I
10.1118/1.2948409
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Helical tomotherapy delivers intensity modulated radiation therapy using a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) to modulate a fan beam of radiation. This delivery occurs while the linac gantry and treatment couch are both in constant motion, so the beam describes, from a patient/phantom perspective, a spiral or helix of dose. The planning system models this continuous delivery as a large number (51) of discrete gantry positions per rotation, and given the small jaw/fan width setting typically used (1 or 2.5 cm) and the number of overlapping rotations used to cover the target (pitch often < 0.5), the treatment planning system (TPS) potentially employs a very large number of static beam directions and leaf opening configurations to model the modulated fields. All dose calculations performed by the system employ a convolution/superposition model. In this work the authors perform a full Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation of tomotherapy deliveries to phantom computed tomography (CT) data sets to verify the TPS calculations. All MC calculations are performed with the EGSnrc-based MC simulation codes, BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc. Simulations are performed by taking the sinogram (leaf opening versus time) of the treatment plan and decomposing it into 51 different projections per rotation, as does the TPS, each of which is segmented further into multiple MLC opening configurations, each with different weights that correspond to leaf opening times. Then the projection is simulated by the summing of all of the opening configurations, and the overall rotational treatment is simulated by the summing of all of the projection simulations. Commissioning of the source model was verified by comparing measured and simulated values for the percent depth dose and beam profiles shapes for various jaw settings. The accuracy of the MLC leaf width and tongue and groove spacing were verified by comparing measured and simulated values for the MLC leakage and a picket fence pattern. The validated source and MLC configuration were then used to simulate a complex modulated delivery from fixed gantry angle. Further, a preliminary rotational treatment plan to a delivery quality assurance phantom (the "cheese" phantom) CT data set was simulated. Simulations were compared with measured results taken with an A1SL ionization chamber or EDR2 film measurements in a water tank or in a solid water phantom, respectively. The source and MLC MC simulations agree with the film measurements, with an acceptable number of pixels passing the 2%/1 mm gamma criterion. 99.8% of voxels of the MC calculation in the planning target volume (PTV) of the preliminary plan passed the 2%/2 mm gamma value test. 87.0% and 66.2% of the voxels in two organs at risk (OARs) passed the 2%/2 mm tests. For a 3%/3 mm criterion, the PTV and OARs show 100%, 93.2%, and 86.6% agreement, respectively. All voxels passed the gamma value test with a criterion of 5%/3 mm. The TomoTherapy TPS showed comparable results. (c) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3491 / 3500
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for proton therapy
    Fippel, M
    Soukup, M
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (08) : 2263 - 2273
  • [42] Validation of Monte Carlo Electron Dose Calculation in RayStation
    Yang, K.
    Chen, H.
    Mourtada, F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E261 - E261
  • [43] Electron beam commissioning for Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Deng, J
    Jiang, SB
    Pawlicki, T
    Li, JS
    Ma, CM
    [J]. USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, 2000, : 431 - 433
  • [44] A comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation denoising techniques
    El Naqa, I
    Kawrakow, I
    Fippel, M
    Siebers, JV
    Lindsay, PE
    Wickerhauser, MV
    Vicic, M
    Zakarian, K
    Kauffmann, N
    Deasy, JO
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05): : 909 - 922
  • [45] Monte carlo dose calculation in dental amalgam phantom
    Aziz, Mohd. Zahri Abdul
    Yusoff, A. L.
    Osman, N. D.
    Abdullah, R.
    Rabaie, N. A.
    Salikin, M. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 40 (03) : 150 - 155
  • [46] Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm on a distributed system
    Chauvie, S
    Dominoni, M
    Marini, P
    Stasi, M
    Pia, MG
    Scielzo, G
    [J]. NUCLEAR PHYSICS B-PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTS, 2003, 125 : 159 - 163
  • [47] Clinical implementation of proton Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Paganetti, H
    Jiang, H
    Kollipara, S
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2028 - 2028
  • [48] MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF ABSORBED DOSE IN XEROMAMMOGRAPHY
    DANCE, DR
    BAKER, AM
    DAVIS, R
    STACEY, AJ
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1980, 25 (04): : 760 - 760
  • [49] Feasibility of an Independent Dose Calculation for VMAT with Monte Carlo
    Quino, L. Vazquez
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [50] Evaluation Of The Impact Of CT Hounsfield Unit Calibration on Dose Calculation in Helical Tomotherapy
    Klueter, S.
    Schubert, K.
    Lissner, S.
    Debus, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S848 - S849