Primary air pollutant emissions of coal-fired power plants in China: Current status and future prediction

被引:357
|
作者
Zhao, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Shuxiao [1 ]
Duan, Lei [1 ]
Lei, Yu [1 ]
Cao, Pengfei [1 ]
Hao, Jiming [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Coal-fired power plant; Unit-based method; Emission control; China;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To explore the atmospheric emissions of coal-fired power sector in China, a unit-based method was developed based on detailed information of unit type, fuel quality, emission control technology, and geographical location. During 2000-2005, the period when power sector developed fastest in the past 20 years, SO2, NO, and PM emissions of coal-fired power plants increased by 1.5, 1.7 and 1.2 times, respectively. The SO2, emission of coal-fired power sector was estimated to be 16 097 kt in 2005, and would decrease to 11801 kt in 2010, attributed mainly to the wide application of the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology. The NOx emission, however, would increase from 6965 kt in 2005 to 9680 kt in 2010, since few NOx control measures would be taken during the five years. The TSP, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions in 2005 were estimated to be 2774, 1842 and 994 kt, and the values would be 2540, 1824 and 1090 kt in 2010 respectively. The wet FGD would play an important role on dust emission removal. Through faithful implementation of closing small units and emission control policies in the acid rain and sulfur dioxide control zones, approximately 33%, 6% and 25% of SO2, NO, and TSP emissions respectively could be further reduced in 2010. Emissions in 2015 and 2020 of coal-fired power plants were predicted applying scenario analysis. For SO2 and TSP, Optimistic Situation can be achieved through reasonable control policies; in contrast, NOx would probably be a more serious issue in future. (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:8442 / 8452
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Control strategies of atmospheric mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China
    Tian, Hezhong
    Wang, Yan
    Cheng, Ke
    Qu, Yiping
    Hao, Jiming
    Xue, Zhigang
    Chai, Fahe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2012, 62 (05) : 576 - 586
  • [32] Synergistic Mercury Removal by Conventional Pollutant Control Strategies for Coal-Fired Power Plants in China
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Zhang, Lei
    Wu, Ye
    Ancora, Maria Pia
    Zhao, Yu
    Hao, Jiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2010, 60 (06) : 722 - 730
  • [33] Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants
    Srivastava, RK
    Miller, CA
    Erickson, C
    Jambhekar, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2004, 54 (06) : 750 - 762
  • [34] Influence of Mercury and Chlorine Content of Coal on Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants in China
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Shuixao
    Meng, Yang
    Hao, Jiming
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (11) : 6385 - 6392
  • [35] Effect of Coordinated Air Pollution Control Devices in Coal-Fired Power Plants on Arsenic Emissions
    Wang, Jiawei
    Zhang, Yongsheng
    Liu, Zhao
    Norris, Pauline
    Romero, Carlos E.
    Xu, Hong
    Pan, Wei-Ping
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2017, 31 (07) : 7309 - 7316
  • [36] Analysis of air Quality in the Area of Coal-fired Power Plants
    Tatar, Adina Milena
    [J]. REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2018, 69 (06): : 1403 - 1406
  • [37] Status of and experience with NOx reduction in coal-fired power plants
    Stohr, M
    Schutz, M
    Kruger, H
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 1997, 211 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [38] Prediction of NOx emissions for coal-fired power plants with stacked-generalization ensemble method
    Yuan, Zhaowei
    Meng, Lei
    Gu, Xiaobing
    Bai, Yuyong
    Cui, Huanmin
    Jiang, Chengyu
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 289
  • [39] Coal-fired power stationf of the future Part 1: Status and development potentials of conventional coal-fired power stations
    Pruschek, R
    Oeljeklaus, G
    Haupt, G
    Zimmermann, G
    [J]. BRENNSTOFF-WARME-KRAFT, 1997, 49 (9-10): : 44 - +
  • [40] Coal-Fired Power Plants Alternative Petcoke Fired Power Plants
    Ozcelik, Ozlem
    Boran, Kurtulus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2016, 19 (04): : 531 - 535