Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants

被引:276
|
作者
Srivastava, RK [1 ]
Miller, CA
Erickson, C
Jambhekar, R
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Air Pollut Prevent & Control Div, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] Babcock Borsig Power Inc, Worcester, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10473289.2004.10470943
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Emissions of sulfur trioxide (SO,) are a key component of plume opacity and acid deposition. Consequently, these emissions need to be low enough to not cause opacity violations and acid deposition. Generally, a small fraction of sulfur (S) in coal is converted to SO3 in coal-fired combustion devices such as electric utility boilers. The emissions of SO3 from such a boiler depend on coal S content, combustion conditions, flue gas characteristics, and air pollution devices being used. It is well known that the catalyst used in the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology for nitrogen oxides control oxidizes a small fraction of sulfur dioxide in the flue gas to SO3, The extent of this oxidation depends on the catalyst formulation and SCR operating conditions. Gas-phase SO3 and sulfuric acid, on being quenched in plant equipment (e.g., air preheater and wet scrubber), result in fine acidic mist, which can cause increased plume opacity and undesirable emissions. Recently, such effects have been observed at plants firing high-S coal and equipped with SCR systems and wet scrubbers. This paper investigates the factors that affect acidic mist production in coal-fired electric utility boilers and discusses approaches for mitigating emission of this mist.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 762
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sulfur trioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants in China and implications on future control
    Ren, Yujia
    Wu, Qingru
    Wen, Minneng
    Li, Guoliang
    Xu, Liwen
    Ding, Xiang
    Li, Zhijian
    Tang, Yi
    Wang, Yu
    Li, Qing
    Wang, Shuxiao
    [J]. FUEL, 2020, 261
  • [2] Emission characteristics of condensable particulate matter and sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants
    Yang, Fuxin
    Li, Zhenghong
    Liu, Hexin
    Feng, Peng
    Tan, Houzhang
    Zhang, Sicong
    Lu, Xuchao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2021, 94 : 146 - 156
  • [3] Mercury emissions and partitioning from Indian coal-fired power plants
    Hridesh Agarwalla
    Rabi Narayan Senapati
    Tarit Baran Das
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 100 (02) : 28 - 33
  • [4] Urban impacts of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants
    Sullivan, Terry M.
    Adams, Jay
    Blake, Reginald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 53 - 70
  • [5] THE ACCUMULATION BY PLANTS OF EMISSIONS FROM A COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANT
    MURRAY, F
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 18 (08) : 1705 - 1709
  • [6] ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED THERMAL POWER-PLANTS
    COLLEY, DG
    [J]. CIM BULLETIN, 1988, 81 (915): : 49 - 49
  • [7] ANALYZING RADIONUCLIDE EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    KEENEY, RL
    SICHERMAN, A
    SMITH, GR
    [J]. INTERFACES, 1985, 15 (05) : 12 - 24
  • [8] Mercury emissions and partitioning from Indian coal-fired power plants
    Agarwalla, Hridesh
    Senapati, Rabi Narayan
    Das, Tarit Baran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 100 : 28 - 33
  • [9] Mercury emissions from six coal-fired power plants in China
    Zhang, Liang
    Zhuo, Yuqun
    Chen, Lei
    Xu, Xuchang
    Chen, Changhe
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 89 (11) : 1033 - 1040
  • [10] Sulfur, lead, and mercury characteristics in South Africa coals and emissions from the coal-fired power plants
    Teklit Zerizghi
    Qingjun Guo
    Changqiu Zhao
    Chukwunonso Peter Okoli
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2022, 81