Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants

被引:276
|
作者
Srivastava, RK [1 ]
Miller, CA
Erickson, C
Jambhekar, R
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Air Pollut Prevent & Control Div, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] Babcock Borsig Power Inc, Worcester, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10473289.2004.10470943
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Emissions of sulfur trioxide (SO,) are a key component of plume opacity and acid deposition. Consequently, these emissions need to be low enough to not cause opacity violations and acid deposition. Generally, a small fraction of sulfur (S) in coal is converted to SO3 in coal-fired combustion devices such as electric utility boilers. The emissions of SO3 from such a boiler depend on coal S content, combustion conditions, flue gas characteristics, and air pollution devices being used. It is well known that the catalyst used in the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology for nitrogen oxides control oxidizes a small fraction of sulfur dioxide in the flue gas to SO3, The extent of this oxidation depends on the catalyst formulation and SCR operating conditions. Gas-phase SO3 and sulfuric acid, on being quenched in plant equipment (e.g., air preheater and wet scrubber), result in fine acidic mist, which can cause increased plume opacity and undesirable emissions. Recently, such effects have been observed at plants firing high-S coal and equipped with SCR systems and wet scrubbers. This paper investigates the factors that affect acidic mist production in coal-fired electric utility boilers and discusses approaches for mitigating emission of this mist.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 762
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] APPLIED COAL TECHNOLOGY - SULFUR REMOVAL POTENTIAL OF AMERICAN COALS AS A DETERMINANT OF SULFUR-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    ERGUN, S
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1981, 300 (1453): : 89 - 98
  • [32] INTERACTION IN EMISSIONS CONTROL FOR COAL-FIRED PLANTS
    不详
    [J]. ERDOL & KOHLE ERDGAS PETROCHEMIE, 1993, 46 (12): : 443 - 444
  • [33] EMISSIONS CONTROL R AND D FOR COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    SPROULL, WT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1978, 28 (03): : 221 - 223
  • [34] The mercury mass flow and emissions of coal-fired power plants in China
    Hui, Mu-Lin
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Zu-Guang
    Wang, Shu-Xiao
    [J]. Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2015, 35 (08): : 2241 - 2250
  • [35] The rates of emissions of fine particles from some Canadian coal-fired power plants
    Goodarzi, F
    [J]. FUEL, 2006, 85 (04) : 425 - 433
  • [36] Research Progress on Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Coal-fired Power Plants
    Jingxin Xu
    Fahua Zhu
    Xinlei Ge
    Haiwei Li
    Xiuyong Zhao
    Wenxin Tian
    Xi Zhang
    Yuan Bai
    Fengxia An
    Sheng Wang
    [J]. Current Pollution Reports, 2022, 8 : 303 - 314
  • [37] Emissions of mercury and other trace elements from coal-fired power plants in Japan
    Ito, Shigeo
    Yokoyama, Takahisa
    Asakura, Kazuo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 368 (01) : 397 - 402
  • [38] Control strategies of atmospheric mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China
    Tian, Hezhong
    Wang, Yan
    Cheng, Ke
    Qu, Yiping
    Hao, Jiming
    Xue, Zhigang
    Chai, Fahe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2012, 62 (05) : 576 - 586
  • [39] HAZARDOUS AIR-POLLUTION EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    SCHMIDT, CE
    BROWN, TD
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1993, 205 : 22 - FUEL
  • [40] Reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in India: Possibilities and challenges
    Alphin Joy
    Asif Qureshi
    [J]. Ambio, 2023, 52 : 242 - 252