The factors affecting end-of-life decision-making by physicians of patients with intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands: a qualitative study

被引:23
|
作者
Wagemans, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lantman-de Valk, H. van Schrojenstein [5 ]
Proot, I. [2 ]
Metsemakers, J. [3 ]
Tuffrey-Wijne, I. [2 ,6 ]
Curfs, L. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Koraalgroep, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Governor Kremers Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, CAPHRI, Sch Primary Care & Publ Hlth,Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community Care, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] St Georges Univ London, Div Populat Hlth Sci & Educ, London, England
关键词
death; end-of-life decisions; ethical issues; learning disabilities; palliative care; PEOPLE; CARE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01550.x
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the process of end-of-life decision-making regarding people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in the Netherlands, from the perspective of physicians. Methods This qualitative study involved nine semi-structured interviews with ID physicians in the Netherlands after the deaths of patients with ID that involved end-of-life decisions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Grounded Theory procedures. Results Four main contributory factors to the physicians decision-making process were identified, three of which are related to the importance of relatives' wishes and opinions: (1) Involving relatives in decision-making. As they had assessed their patients as lacking capacity, the physicians gave very great weight to the opinions and wishes of the relatives and tended to follow these wishes. (2) Delegating quality of life assessments to relatives. Physicians justified their end-of-life decisions based on their medical assessment, but left the assessment of the patients' quality of life to relatives, despite having their own implicit opinion about quality of life. (3) Good working relationships. Physicians sought consensus with relatives and paid care staff, often giving greater weight to the importance of good working relationships than to their own assessment of the patient's best interest. (4) Knowledge of the patient's vulnerabilities. Physicians used their intimate, long-standing knowledge of the patient's fragile health. Conclusions In order to take a more balanced decision, physicians should seek possibilities to involve patients with ID themselves and other stakeholders which are important for the patients. Physicians who have known the patient over time should rely more on their own knowledge of the patient's needs and preferences, seek the input of others, and openly take the lead in the decision-making process.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:380 / 389
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE END-OF-LIFE TRAJECTORY AND PROVISION OF END-OF-LIFE CARE FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES (ID)
    Tuffrey-Wijne, I.
    Todd, S.
    Hatton, C.
    Glover, G.
    Heslop, P.
    Brearley, S.
    Hunt, K.
    Finlay, I.
    Hollins, S.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (07) : 651 - 651
  • [22] Influence of physicians' life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries
    Cohen, J.
    van Delden, J.
    Mortier, F.
    Lofmark, R.
    Norup, M.
    Cartwright, C.
    Faisst, K.
    Canova, C.
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.
    Bilsen, J.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (04) : 247 - 253
  • [23] The duty to care - The right to refuse - Changing roles of patients and physicians in end-of-life decision-making
    Garwin, M
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 1998, 19 (01) : 99 - 125
  • [24] End-of-life decision making - A qualitative study of elderly individuals
    Rosenfeld, KE
    Wenger, NS
    Kagawa-Singer, M
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (09) : 620 - 625
  • [25] End-of-life decision-making for children with severe developmental disabilities: The parental perspective
    Zaal-Schuller, I. H.
    de Vos, M. A.
    Ewals, F. V. P. M.
    van Goudoever, J. B.
    Willems, D. L.
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2016, 49-50 : 235 - 246
  • [26] End-of-Life Decision-Making for People With Intellectual Disability From the Perspective of Nurses
    Wagemans, A. M. A.
    Lantman-de Valk, H. M. J. van Schrojenstein
    Proot, I. M.
    Metsemakers, J.
    Tuffrey-Wijne, I.
    Curfs, L. M. G.
    JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2015, 12 (04) : 294 - 302
  • [27] End-of-Life Decision-Making in Canada: The Report by the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End-of-Life Decision-Making
    Schueklenk, Udo
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    Downie, Jocelyn
    Mclean, Sheila A. M.
    Upshur, Ross
    Weinstock, Daniel
    BIOETHICS, 2011, 25 : 1 - 73
  • [28] Standardization of end-of-life decision-making in chronic dialysis patients
    不详
    Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 2007, 3 (5): : 238 - 238
  • [29] Patients' perspectives on dialysis decision-making and end-of-life care
    Saeed, Fahad
    Sardar, Muhammad Adil
    Davison, Sara N.
    Murad, Hans
    Duberstein, Paul R.
    Quill, Timothy Edward
    CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 91 (05) : 294 - 300
  • [30] End-of-life decision-making among the AYA cancer patients
    Kubo, Emi
    Ishiki, Hiroto
    Yamada, Miho
    Kawaguchi, Takashi
    Arakawa, Sayaka
    Yokota, Sayuri
    Kiuchi, Daisuke
    Amano, Koji
    Satomi, Eriko
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S291 - S291