The factors affecting end-of-life decision-making by physicians of patients with intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands: a qualitative study

被引:23
|
作者
Wagemans, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lantman-de Valk, H. van Schrojenstein [5 ]
Proot, I. [2 ]
Metsemakers, J. [3 ]
Tuffrey-Wijne, I. [2 ,6 ]
Curfs, L. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Koraalgroep, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Governor Kremers Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, CAPHRI, Sch Primary Care & Publ Hlth,Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community Care, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] St Georges Univ London, Div Populat Hlth Sci & Educ, London, England
关键词
death; end-of-life decisions; ethical issues; learning disabilities; palliative care; PEOPLE; CARE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01550.x
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the process of end-of-life decision-making regarding people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in the Netherlands, from the perspective of physicians. Methods This qualitative study involved nine semi-structured interviews with ID physicians in the Netherlands after the deaths of patients with ID that involved end-of-life decisions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Grounded Theory procedures. Results Four main contributory factors to the physicians decision-making process were identified, three of which are related to the importance of relatives' wishes and opinions: (1) Involving relatives in decision-making. As they had assessed their patients as lacking capacity, the physicians gave very great weight to the opinions and wishes of the relatives and tended to follow these wishes. (2) Delegating quality of life assessments to relatives. Physicians justified their end-of-life decisions based on their medical assessment, but left the assessment of the patients' quality of life to relatives, despite having their own implicit opinion about quality of life. (3) Good working relationships. Physicians sought consensus with relatives and paid care staff, often giving greater weight to the importance of good working relationships than to their own assessment of the patient's best interest. (4) Knowledge of the patient's vulnerabilities. Physicians used their intimate, long-standing knowledge of the patient's fragile health. Conclusions In order to take a more balanced decision, physicians should seek possibilities to involve patients with ID themselves and other stakeholders which are important for the patients. Physicians who have known the patient over time should rely more on their own knowledge of the patient's needs and preferences, seek the input of others, and openly take the lead in the decision-making process.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:380 / 389
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences of end-of-life decision-making in geriatric settings
    Valter Giantin
    Paola Siviero
    Matteo Simonato
    Mario Iasevoli
    Valentina Pengo
    Margherita Andrigo
    Matteo Storti
    Elisabetta Valentini
    Renzo Pegoraro
    Stefania Maggi
    Gaetano Crepaldi
    Enzo Manzato
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2012, 24 (5) : 537 - 547
  • [12] Physicians' and nurses' experiences of end-of-life decision-making in geriatric settings
    Giantin, Valter
    Siviero, Paola
    Simonato, Matteo
    Iasevoli, Mario
    Pengo, Valentina
    Andrigo, Margherita
    Storti, Matteo
    Valentini, Elisabetta
    Pegoraro, Renzo
    Maggi, Stefania
    Crepaldi, Gaetano
    Manzato, Enzo
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (05) : 537 - 547
  • [13] Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences of end-of-life decision-making in geriatric settings
    Valter Giantin
    Paola Siviero
    Matteo Simonato
    Mario Iasevoli
    Valentina Pengo
    Margherita Andrigo
    Matteo Storti
    Elisabetta Valentini
    Renzo Pegoraro
    Stefania Maggi
    Gaetano Crepaldi
    Enzo Manzato
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2012, 24 : 537 - 547
  • [14] END-OF-LIFE DECISION-MAKING IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE SEPSIS
    Schwarzkopf, D.
    Westennann, I.
    Skupin, H.
    Pfeifer, R.
    Fritzenwanger, M.
    Guenther, A.
    Kabisch, B.
    Peschel, I.
    Engel, C.
    Settmacher, U.
    Doenst, T.
    Reinhart, K.
    Hartog, C. S.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 : S174 - S175
  • [15] Factors Associated with Decision-Making about End-of-Life Care by Hemodialysis Patients
    Baharoon, Salim A.
    Al-Jahdali, Hamdan H.
    Al-Sayyari, Abdullah A.
    Tamim, Hani
    Babgi, Yaser
    Al-Ghamdi, Saeed M.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES AND TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 21 (03) : 447 - 453
  • [16] Autonomy and end-of-life decision-making
    Olver, IN
    Eliott, J
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2000, 9 (05) : S37 - S37
  • [17] Suffering and end-of-life decision-making
    Isaacs, David
    Preisz, Anne
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2021, 57 (09) : 1356 - 1359
  • [18] End-of-life decision-making in India
    Chittem, Mahati
    Eliott, Jaklin
    Olver, Ian
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 25 (SP. S3) : 109 - 109
  • [19] RELIGION AND END-OF-LIFE DECISION-MAKING
    Cahn, Naomi
    Ziettlow, Amy
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 2016, (04): : 1713 - 1736
  • [20] Factors that Influence End-Of-Life Decision Making Amongst Attending Physicians
    Pai, Suraj
    Andrews, Tracy
    Turner, Amber
    Merchant, Aziz
    Shapiro, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (10): : 1174 - 1181