The factors affecting end-of-life decision-making by physicians of patients with intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands: a qualitative study

被引:23
|
作者
Wagemans, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lantman-de Valk, H. van Schrojenstein [5 ]
Proot, I. [2 ]
Metsemakers, J. [3 ]
Tuffrey-Wijne, I. [2 ,6 ]
Curfs, L. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Koraalgroep, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Governor Kremers Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, CAPHRI, Sch Primary Care & Publ Hlth,Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community Care, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] St Georges Univ London, Div Populat Hlth Sci & Educ, London, England
关键词
death; end-of-life decisions; ethical issues; learning disabilities; palliative care; PEOPLE; CARE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01550.x
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the process of end-of-life decision-making regarding people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in the Netherlands, from the perspective of physicians. Methods This qualitative study involved nine semi-structured interviews with ID physicians in the Netherlands after the deaths of patients with ID that involved end-of-life decisions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Grounded Theory procedures. Results Four main contributory factors to the physicians decision-making process were identified, three of which are related to the importance of relatives' wishes and opinions: (1) Involving relatives in decision-making. As they had assessed their patients as lacking capacity, the physicians gave very great weight to the opinions and wishes of the relatives and tended to follow these wishes. (2) Delegating quality of life assessments to relatives. Physicians justified their end-of-life decisions based on their medical assessment, but left the assessment of the patients' quality of life to relatives, despite having their own implicit opinion about quality of life. (3) Good working relationships. Physicians sought consensus with relatives and paid care staff, often giving greater weight to the importance of good working relationships than to their own assessment of the patient's best interest. (4) Knowledge of the patient's vulnerabilities. Physicians used their intimate, long-standing knowledge of the patient's fragile health. Conclusions In order to take a more balanced decision, physicians should seek possibilities to involve patients with ID themselves and other stakeholders which are important for the patients. Physicians who have known the patient over time should rely more on their own knowledge of the patient's needs and preferences, seek the input of others, and openly take the lead in the decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 389
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How parents and physicians experience end-of-life decision-making for children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities
    Zaal-Schuller, I. H.
    Willems, D. L.
    Ewals, F. V. P. M.
    van Goudoever, J. B.
    de Vos, M. A.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2016, 59 : 283 - 293
  • [2] Factors affecting decision-making by young adults with intellectual disabilities
    Jenkinson, JC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION, 1999, 104 (04): : 320 - 329
  • [3] Coping and end-of-life decision-making in ALS: A qualitative interview study
    Spoden, Celia
    Wenzel, Olga
    Erdmann, Anke
    Neitzke, Gerald
    Hirschberg, Irene
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [4] End-of-life decision-making: a descriptive study on the decisional attitudes of Italian physicians
    Lucchiari, Claudio
    Masiero, Marianna
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    Vago, Gianluca
    Wears, Robert L.
    [J]. LIFE SPAN AND DISABILITY, 2010, 13 (01) : 71 - 86
  • [5] End-of-Life decision-making in patients with advanced cancer - Perspectives of patients, nurses and physicians
    Mumm, F. H. A.
    Laryionava, K.
    Hiddemann, W.
    Winkler, E. C.
    Heussner, P.
    [J]. ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 37 : 141 - 141
  • [6] End-of-life decision-making
    Kruse, Andreas
    [J]. INNERE MEDIZIN, 2024,
  • [7] The Process of End-of-Life Decision-Making in Pediatrics: A National Survey in the Netherlands
    de Vos, Mirjam A.
    van der Heide, Agnes
    Maurice-Stam, Heleen
    Brouwer, Oebele F.
    Plotz, Frans B.
    Schouten-van Meeteren, Antoinette Y. N.
    Willems, Dick L.
    Heymans, Hugo S. A.
    Bos, Albert P.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2011, 127 (04) : E1004 - E1012
  • [8] Considering life and death: a qualitative vignette study among farm animal veterinarians in the Netherlands on considerations in end-of-life decision-making
    Deelen, Ellen
    Meijboom, Franck L. B.
    Tobias, Tijs J.
    Koster, Ferry
    Hesselink, Jan Willem
    Rodenburg, T. Bas
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 4
  • [9] Is shared decision-making vanishing at the end-of-life? A descriptive and qualitative study of advanced cancer patients' involvement in specific therapies decision-making
    Beaussant, Yvan
    Mathieu-Nicot, Florence
    Pazart, Lionel
    Tournigand, Christophe
    Daneault, Serge
    Cretin, Elodie
    Godard-Marceau, Aurelie
    Chassagne, Aline
    Trimaille, Helene
    Bouleuc, Carole
    Cuynet, Patrice
    Deconinck, Eric
    Aubry, Regis
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 14
  • [10] Is shared decision-making vanishing at the end-of-life? A descriptive and qualitative study of advanced cancer patients’ involvement in specific therapies decision-making
    Yvan Beaussant
    Florence Mathieu-Nicot
    Lionel Pazart
    Christophe Tournigand
    Serge Daneault
    Elodie Cretin
    Aurélie Godard-Marceau
    Aline Chassagne
    Hélène Trimaille
    Carole Bouleuc
    Patrice Cuynet
    Eric Deconinck
    Régis Aubry
    [J]. BMC Palliative Care, 14