Comparing Life Cycle Costing and Performance Part Costing in Assessing Acquisition and Operational Cost of New Manufacturing Technologies

被引:11
|
作者
Kianian, Babak [1 ]
Kurdve, Martin [2 ]
Andersson, Carin [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Prod & Mat Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Box 118, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Div Supply & Operat Management, Dept Technol Management & Econ, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Life Cycle Costing (LCC); Performance Part Costing (PPC); Decision Support System (DSS); Gear Manufacturing; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.025
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Even if practitioners want to adopt new manufacturing technologies, there is a lack of comprehensive tools to support their decisions, regarding both cost and sustainability. This paper reviews and compares the practical use of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) with a performance part costing (PPC) model, chosen based upon the criteria of providing in-depth analysis capabilities and the prospect of integrating cost and sustainability assessment. A case study of a Swedish gear manufacturer is selected, where the company investigates adoption of a new manufacturing technology. Since, this type of decision requires heavy investments e.g. in new machines, tools, linking performance with costs would be a prerequisite for performing well-informed decisions. Based on interviews, the level of detail requirements e.g., performance indicators, when acquiring new technologies are identified. LCC model cost parameters are compared with the PPC cost drivers and the data availability and estimation are discussed. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 433
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] IMPLEMENTING LIFE-CYCLE COSTING: DATA INTEGRATION BETWEEN DESIGN MODELS AND COST CALCULATIONS
    Saridaki, Maria
    Psarra, Magdalini
    Haugbolle, Kim
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 24 : 14 - 32
  • [42] Implications of the long term bridge performance program for life cycle costing in the United States
    Chase, Steve
    Ghasemi, Hamid
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2009, 5 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [43] The need for economic performance measures for life cycle costing of sustainable commercial office buildings
    Oduyemi, Olufolahan
    Okoroh, Michael Iheoma
    Fajana, Oluwaseun Samuel
    Arowosafe, Oluwumi
    JOURNAL OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 16 (01) : 54 - 64
  • [44] Risk Overview and Cost Prediction Model for Refinery Equipment Using Life Cycle Costing Analysis
    Zainuddin, Radziah
    Jaafar, Jafreezal
    Aziz, Izzatdin Abdul
    2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND ANALYTICS (ICBDA), 2018, : 7 - 11
  • [45] LIFE-CYCLE COSTING - AN APPLICATION OF TOTAL-COST PURCHASING IN BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS
    GARCIA, HF
    AGA 1989 OPERATING SECTION PROCEEDINGS, 1989, : 403 - 405
  • [46] Life Cycle Costing applied to railway design and maintenance: creating a dashboard for infrastructure performance planning
    Zoeteman, A
    URBAN TRANSPORT IX: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2003, 14 : 647 - 656
  • [47] Evaluating the environmental and economic performance of biological and advanced biological wastewater treatment plants by life cycle assessment and life cycle costing
    Simge Çankaya
    Beyhan Pekey
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196
  • [48] Evaluating the environmental and economic performance of biological and advanced biological wastewater treatment plants by life cycle assessment and life cycle costing
    Cankaya, Simge
    Pekey, Beyhan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (04)
  • [49] Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes
    Sherman, Jodi D.
    Raibley, Lewis A.
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 127 (02): : 434 - 443
  • [50] Cost management for waste to energy systems using life cycle costing approach: A case study from China
    Li, Chunxi
    Wang, Feng
    Zhang, Dan
    Ye, Xuemin
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 8 (02)