Comparing Life Cycle Costing and Performance Part Costing in Assessing Acquisition and Operational Cost of New Manufacturing Technologies

被引:11
|
作者
Kianian, Babak [1 ]
Kurdve, Martin [2 ]
Andersson, Carin [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Prod & Mat Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Box 118, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Div Supply & Operat Management, Dept Technol Management & Econ, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Life Cycle Costing (LCC); Performance Part Costing (PPC); Decision Support System (DSS); Gear Manufacturing; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.025
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Even if practitioners want to adopt new manufacturing technologies, there is a lack of comprehensive tools to support their decisions, regarding both cost and sustainability. This paper reviews and compares the practical use of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) with a performance part costing (PPC) model, chosen based upon the criteria of providing in-depth analysis capabilities and the prospect of integrating cost and sustainability assessment. A case study of a Swedish gear manufacturer is selected, where the company investigates adoption of a new manufacturing technology. Since, this type of decision requires heavy investments e.g. in new machines, tools, linking performance with costs would be a prerequisite for performing well-informed decisions. Based on interviews, the level of detail requirements e.g., performance indicators, when acquiring new technologies are identified. LCC model cost parameters are compared with the PPC cost drivers and the data availability and estimation are discussed. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 433
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LIFE CYCLE COST MODELING OF PUMPS USING AN ACTIVITY BASED COSTING METHODOLOGY
    Waghmode, Laxman Yadu
    Sahasrabudhe, Anil Dattatraya
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 10TH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND ANALYSIS, 2010, VOL 4, 2010, : 323 - 332
  • [32] Adaptation of Life Cycle Costing Practices to Financial Performance Analysis in Transitional Economies: The Experience of Russian Manufacturing Firms
    Erokhin, Vasilii
    Bobryshev, Alexey
    Manzhosova, Inna
    Frolov, Alexandr
    Shamrina, Svetlana
    Agafonova, Nelly
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [33] The development of an integrated life cycle costing model using object oriented and VR technologies
    Al-Hajj, A
    Aouad, G
    DURABILITY OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS 8, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 2901 - 2908
  • [34] Applying a non-deterministic conceptual life cycle costing model to manufacturing processes
    Settanni, Ettore
    Emblemsvag, Jan
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2010, 5 (03) : 220 - 262
  • [35] VEHICLE LIFE-CYCLE COSTING WITH PROBABILISTIC PART REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR OPTIONS.
    Jackson, George C.
    Maze, T.H.
    Transportation Research Record, 1983, : 15 - 18
  • [36] Combined Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing in the Eco-Care-Matrix: A case study on the performance of a modernized manufacturing system for glass containers
    Auer, Johannes
    Bey, Niki
    Schaefer, Johannes-Marius
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 141 : 99 - 109
  • [37] Optimizing the performance of railway systems: Life Cycle Costing for rail infrastructure managers
    Zoeteman, A
    2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN & CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 4159 - 4164
  • [38] APPLICATION OF COST SIGNIFICANT ITEMS TOWARDS IMPROVING ESTIMATION FOR LIFE CYCLE COSTING OF BUILDING PROJECTS
    Alqahtani, Ayedh
    Whyte, Andrew
    IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE IDEAS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, : A71 - A76
  • [39] Incorporating externalities into a full cost approach to electric power generation life-cycle costing
    Roth, IF
    Ambs, LL
    ENERGY, 2004, 29 (12-15) : 2125 - 2144
  • [40] Combining life cycle costing and life cycle assessment for an analysis of a new residential district energy system design
    Ristimaki, Miro
    Saynajoki, Antti
    Heinonen, Jukka
    Junnila, Seppo
    ENERGY, 2013, 63 : 168 - 179