Reproducibility of the ambulatory arterial stiffness index in hypertensive patients

被引:21
|
作者
Dechering, Dirk G. [1 ,2 ]
van der Steen, Marijke S. [2 ]
Adiyaman, Ahmet [2 ]
Thijs, Lutgarde [1 ]
Deinum, Jaap [2 ]
Li, Yan [3 ]
Dolan, Eamon [4 ]
Akkermans, Reinier P. M. [2 ]
Richart, Tom [1 ,5 ]
Hansen, Tine W. [6 ,7 ]
Kikuya, Masahiro [8 ]
Wang, Jiguang [3 ]
O'Brien, Eoin [9 ]
Thien, Theo [2 ]
Staessen, Jan A. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Div Hypertens & Cardiovasc Rehabil, Studies Coordinating Ctr, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Univ Med Ctr St Radboud, Dept Gen Internal Med, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ruijin Hosp, Ctr Epidemiol Studies & Clin Trials, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge Univ Hosp, Cambridge, England
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Genet Epidemiol Unit, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Res Ctr Prevent & Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
[9] Univ Coll Dublin, Conway Inst Biomol & Biomed Res, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
ambulatory arterial stiffness index; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; arterial stiffness; diurnal blood pressure profile; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e328309ee4c
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background We studied the repeatability of the ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), which can be computed from 24-h blood pressure (BP) recordings as unity minus the regression slope of diastolic on systolic BP. Methods One hundred and fifty-two hypertensive outpatients recruited in Nijmegen (mean age = 46.2 years; 76.3% with systolic and diastolic hypertension) and 145 patients enrolled in the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial (71.0 years) underwent 24-h BP monitoring at a median interval of 8 and 31 days, respectively. We used the repeatability coefficient, which is twice the SD of the within-participant differences between repeat recordings, and expressed it as a percentage of four times the SD of the mean of the paired measurements. Results Mean AASI (crude or derived by time-weighted or robust regression) and 24-h pulse pressure (PP) were similar on repeat recordings in both cohorts. In Nijmegen patients, repeatability coefficients of AASI and PP were similar to 50%. In Syst-Eur trial patients, repeatability coefficient was similar to 60% for AASI and similar to 40% for PP. For comparison, repeatability coefficients for 24-h systolic and diastolic BP were similar to 30%. Differences in AASI between paired recordings were correlated with differences in the goodness of fit (r(2)) of the AASI regression line as well as with differences in the night-to-day BP ratio. However, in sensitivity analyses stratified for type of hypertension, r(2), or dipping status, repeatability coefficients for AASI did not widely depart from 50 to 60% range. Conclusion Estimates of mean AASI were not different between repeat recordings, and repeatability coefficients were within the 50-60% range.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1993 / 2000
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of Hemoglobin with Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index in Untreated Essential Hypertensive Patients Without Anemia
    Chen, Huimin
    Hua, Qi
    Hou, Haixia
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 50 (22) : 2759 - 2765
  • [22] Relationship between ambulatory arterial stiffness index and subclinical target organ damage in hypertensive patients
    Ángel García-García
    Manuel A Gómez-Marcos
    José I Recio-Rodriguez
    Luis J González-Elena
    Javier Parra-Sanchez
    Ma Fe Muñoz-Moreno
    Carmen Patino Alonso
    Francisco Gude
    Luis García-Ortiz
    Hypertension Research, 2011, 34 : 180 - 186
  • [23] Relationship between ambulatory arterial stiffness index and subclinical target organ damage in hypertensive patients
    Garcia-Garcia, Angel
    Gomez-Marcos, Manuel A.
    Recio-Rodriguez, Jose I.
    Gonzalez-Elena, Luis J.
    Parra-Sanchez, Javier
    Fe Munoz-Moreno, Ma
    Patino Alonso, Carmen
    Gude, Francisco
    Garcia-Ortiz, Luis
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2011, 34 (02) : 180 - 186
  • [24] ASSOCIATION OF HAEMOGLOBIN WITH AMBULATORY ARTERIAL STIFFNESS INDEX IN UNTREATED ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITHOUT ANAEMIA
    Chen, HuiMin
    Hua, Qi
    Hou, HaiXia
    HEART, 2011, 97
  • [25] The relationship between ambulatory arterial stiffness index and glomerular filtration rate in treated hypertensive patients
    Gao, Yaqiong
    Hu, Yarong
    Li, Yan
    Chu, Shaoli
    Zhu, Dingliang
    Gao, Pingjin
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (02) : E77 - E77
  • [26] AMBULATORY ARTERIAL STIFFNESS INDEX IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Karakulak, U. N.
    Sahiner, M. L.
    Kilic, L.
    Akdogan, A.
    Fatihoglu, S. G.
    Maharjan, N.
    Kaya, E. B.
    Aytemir, K.
    Oto, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 163 : S17 - S17
  • [27] THE CHANGE OF AMBULATORY ARTERIAL STIFFNESS INDEX IN PATIENTS WITH PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA
    Lu, X.
    Zhu, L.
    Li, Y.
    Niu, W.
    Chu, S.
    Zhu, D.
    Gao, P.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 : S117 - S117
  • [28] Ambulatory arterial stiffness index and its role in assessing arterial stiffness in dialysis patients
    Liu, Wenjin
    Zhou, Jiajun
    Chen, Jianping
    Meng, Meijuan
    Li, Xiurong
    Gao, Chaoqing
    Zhou, Jianmei
    Wang, Liang
    Sun, Zhuxing
    Chu, Hong
    Fan, Wei
    Bai, Youwei
    Yang, Junwei
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 (06) : 1297 - 1301
  • [29] The effect of aliskiren versus ramipril-based treatment on the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index in hypertensive patients
    Andreadis, E. A.
    Angelopoulos, E. T.
    Kolyvas, G. N.
    Agaliotis, G. D.
    Mousoulis, C. G.
    Mousoulis, G. P.
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2014, 33 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [30] Ambulatory arterial stiffness index: a marker of subclinical organ damage in treated and untreated dipper hypertensive patients
    Francesco Natale
    Luigi Aronne
    Maria Giovanna Russo
    Raffaele Calabrò
    Hypertension Research, 2011, 34 : 161 - 161