共 50 条
Ambulatory arterial stiffness index and its role in assessing arterial stiffness in dialysis patients
被引:7
|作者:
Liu, Wenjin
[1
]
Zhou, Jiajun
[2
]
Chen, Jianping
[3
]
Meng, Meijuan
[1
]
Li, Xiurong
[4
]
Gao, Chaoqing
[2
]
Zhou, Jianmei
[2
]
Wang, Liang
[5
]
Sun, Zhuxing
[5
]
Chu, Hong
[6
]
Fan, Wei
[6
]
Bai, Youwei
[7
]
Yang, Junwei
[1
]
机构:
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Ctr Kidney Dis, 262 North Zhongshan Rd, Nanjing 210003, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Wannan Med Coll, Yijishan Hosp, Dept Hemodialysis, Wuhu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Med Sch, Affiliated Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Stat Anal, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Blood Purificat, Changzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Wuxi Peoples Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[6] Jiangsu Univ, Affiliated Yixing Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurol, Yixing, Peoples R China
[7] Luan Peoples Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Luan, Peoples R China
关键词:
ambulatory arterial stiffness index;
ambulatory blood pressure;
arterial stiffness;
dialysis;
pulse pressure;
PULSE-WAVE VELOCITY;
CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY;
BLOOD-PRESSURE;
PREDICTOR;
D O I:
10.1097/HJH.0000000000001309
中图分类号:
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100210 ;
摘要:
Objective:Ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) is a parameter derived from ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) readings. It is calculated as 1 minus the linear slope of DBP on SBP. We tested its value in assessing arterial stiffness in dialysis patients. Methods:We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data from a cohort study. A total of 344 patients on maintenance hemodialysis from six tertiary hospitals were included. All patients underwent ABP monitoring and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) measurement. Clinical determinants of AASI were analyzed, and the ability of AASI for assessing arterial stiffness was compared with ambulatory pulse pressure (PP). Results:Multiple regression analysis rev\ealed that ambulatory PP (beta = 0.003), current smoker (beta = -0.069), age (beta = 0.003) and ambulatory SBP (beta = 0.001) were independent determinants of AASI. Ambulatory PP correlates better with cfPWV than AASI (r = 0.28 for AASI and 0.59 for PP; P for difference: <0.001). When cfPWV was treated as a categorical variable, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis also showed a more potent predictive value of PP over AASI (area under the curve: 0.64 for AASI, 0.80 for PP; P for difference: <0.001). Net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement analysis demonstrated no added predictive value of AASI to PP (net reclassification improvement = -2.2%, P = 0.26; integrated discrimination improvement = 0.001, P = 0.51). Sensitivity analysis in patients with more ABP readings (>= 49) yielded similar results. Conclusion:For dialysis patients, AASI has very limited value in assessing arterial stiffness, whether used alone or added to PP. Our results suggest that this index should not be used as a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness for dialysis patients in future practice and studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1301
页数:5
相关论文