ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IN INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER

被引:0
|
作者
Chandrasekar, Thenappan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Herrera-Caceres, Jaime O. [1 ,2 ]
Klotz, Laurence [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Urol, Dept Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Urol, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2019年 / 72卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Active Surveillance; Intermediate Risk; Biomarkers; Genomic markers; Risk Stratification; CYCLE PROGRESSION SCORE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP; TERM OUTCOMES; GERMLINE MUTATIONS; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; MEN; VALIDATION; DISEASE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Active Surveillance (AS) has become an established treatment option for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), demonstrating superior functional outcomes and excellent oncologic outcomes. As such, it has been appealing to extend AS to patients with intermediate risk PCa. We provide a review of the current experience with AS in the intermediate-risk PCa population. METHODS: cess. Many PSA density, Risk stratification is the key to treatment succlinical factors (age, percent Gleason 4, race/ethnicity, and genetic predisposition) and genomic markers have proven prognostic value in the AS population. We performed a systematic review of the currently available data (randomized trials and prospective cohort studies) to establish the status of AS in the intermediate risk patient population. RESULTS: Our ability to predict the natural history of intermediate risk prostate cancer is imperfect. While the benefits of AS make it an appealing option for men with intermediate risk disease, the published experience to date demonstrates that AS for all men with intermediate risk disease leads to higher rates of metastatic disease and loss of the opportunity for cure. These same studies also demonstrate that a subset of patients with intermediate risk disease have indolent disease that may benefit from AS. This heterogeneity is not adequately captured with traditional histopathologic staging. Clinical, genomic, and radiologic biomarkers play a key role in appropriate risk stratification and patient selection. The optimal use of these biomarkers in the intermediate risk patient is currently the subject of intense evaluation. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance for men at the favorable end of intermediate risk prostate cancer is an appealing alternative to radical therapy, but carries a modest but increased risk of metastatic disease compared to low risk cancer. Many biomarkers are currently being evaluated to enhance precise risk stratification of this important subgroup of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 166
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer
    Lellig, K.
    Beyer, B.
    Graefen, M.
    Zaak, D.
    Stief, C.
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2014, 53 (07): : 1031 - 1039
  • [42] Active surveillance in low risk prostate cancer
    Bozkurt, Ozan
    Demir, Omer
    [J]. UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2013, 12 (02): : 76 - 79
  • [43] Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Gupta, Mohit
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Partin, Alan W.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (05): : 1068 - 1074
  • [44] Active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer
    Gnanappiragasam, S.
    Forde, J. C.
    Moloney, M.
    Kiely, S.
    Walsh, K.
    Durkan, G. C.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 : 24 - 24
  • [45] Re: Risk Group and Death From Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (02) : 370 - 370
  • [46] Re: Risk Group and Death from Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance in Men with Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Taneja, Samir S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02): : 412 - 413
  • [47] National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
    Aghazadeh, Monty A.
    Frankel, Jason
    Belanger, Matthew
    McLaughlin, Tara
    Tortora, Joseph
    Staff, Ilene
    Wagner, Joseph R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (05): : 1196 - 1201
  • [48] Prognostic Value of the Intermediate-risk Feature in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance
    Sherer, Michael, V
    Leonard, Austin J.
    Nelson, Tyler J.
    Guram, Kripa
    De Moraes, Gustavo Rodrigues
    Javier-Desloges, Juan
    Kane, Christopher
    McKay, Rana R.
    Rose, Brent S.
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 50 : 61 - 67
  • [49] Use and early mortality outcomes of active surveillance in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Butler, Santino S.
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Lamba, Nayan
    Mossanen, Matthew
    Martin, Neil E.
    Mouw, Kent W.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    [J]. CANCER, 2019, 125 (18) : 3164 - 3171
  • [50] Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Men With Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Bowler, Nicholas
    Schneider, Adam
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Mark, James R.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 101 - 108