ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IN INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER

被引:0
|
作者
Chandrasekar, Thenappan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Herrera-Caceres, Jaime O. [1 ,2 ]
Klotz, Laurence [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Urol, Dept Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Urol, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2019年 / 72卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Active Surveillance; Intermediate Risk; Biomarkers; Genomic markers; Risk Stratification; CYCLE PROGRESSION SCORE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP; TERM OUTCOMES; GERMLINE MUTATIONS; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; MEN; VALIDATION; DISEASE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Active Surveillance (AS) has become an established treatment option for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), demonstrating superior functional outcomes and excellent oncologic outcomes. As such, it has been appealing to extend AS to patients with intermediate risk PCa. We provide a review of the current experience with AS in the intermediate-risk PCa population. METHODS: cess. Many PSA density, Risk stratification is the key to treatment succlinical factors (age, percent Gleason 4, race/ethnicity, and genetic predisposition) and genomic markers have proven prognostic value in the AS population. We performed a systematic review of the currently available data (randomized trials and prospective cohort studies) to establish the status of AS in the intermediate risk patient population. RESULTS: Our ability to predict the natural history of intermediate risk prostate cancer is imperfect. While the benefits of AS make it an appealing option for men with intermediate risk disease, the published experience to date demonstrates that AS for all men with intermediate risk disease leads to higher rates of metastatic disease and loss of the opportunity for cure. These same studies also demonstrate that a subset of patients with intermediate risk disease have indolent disease that may benefit from AS. This heterogeneity is not adequately captured with traditional histopathologic staging. Clinical, genomic, and radiologic biomarkers play a key role in appropriate risk stratification and patient selection. The optimal use of these biomarkers in the intermediate risk patient is currently the subject of intense evaluation. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance for men at the favorable end of intermediate risk prostate cancer is an appealing alternative to radical therapy, but carries a modest but increased risk of metastatic disease compared to low risk cancer. Many biomarkers are currently being evaluated to enhance precise risk stratification of this important subgroup of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 166
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PROSTATE CANCER Time for active surveillance of intermediate-risk disease?
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2013, 10 (01) : 6 - 8
  • [22] Is active surveillance safe for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer?
    Chung, Hoseok
    Shin, Bo Sung
    Nam, Deok-Hyun
    Chung, Hoseok
    Kim, Myung Ki
    Jung, Seung Il
    Kang, Taek Won
    Kwon, Dong Deuk
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 4 - 4
  • [23] Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: yes, but for whom?
    Overland, Maya R.
    Washington, Samuel L., III
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Herlemann, Annika
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2019, 29 (06) : 605 - 611
  • [24] ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IN 853 MEN WITH LOW AND INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Aning, Jonathan
    Peacock, Michael
    Zargar, Homi
    Harriman, David
    McKenzie, Michael
    Black, Peter
    So, Alan
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Gleave, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E347 - E347
  • [25] Defining Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Suitable for Active Surveillance EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Carroll, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (02): : 298 - 299
  • [26] Management of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with active surveillance: never or sometimes?
    Masic, Selma
    Washington, Samuel L., III
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 231 - 237
  • [27] Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Survival Outcomes in the Sunnybrook Experience
    Musunuru, Hima Bindu
    Yamamoto, Toshihiro
    Klotz, Laurence
    Ghanem, Gabriella
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Sethukavalan, Peraka
    Jethava, Vibhuti
    Jain, Suneil
    Zhang, Liying
    Vesprini, Danny
    Loblaw, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (06): : 1651 - 1657
  • [28] Active Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Current Data
    Blas, Leandro
    Shiota, Masaki
    Eto, Masatoshi
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [29] Active surveillance and focal therapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2015, 4 (03) : 342 - 354
  • [30] Are men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer candidates for active surveillance?
    Raldow, Ann Caroline
    Zhang, Danjie
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Braccioforte, Michelle H.
    Moran, Brian Joseph
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)