Multicenter Experience with Transvenous Lead Extraction of Active Fixation Coronary Sinus Leads

被引:37
|
作者
Maytin, Melanie [1 ]
Carrillo, Roger G. [2 ]
Baltodano, Pablo [2 ]
Schaerf, Raymond H. M. [3 ]
Bongiorni, Maria G. [4 ]
Di Cori, Andrea [4 ]
Curnis, Antonio [5 ]
Cooper, Joshua M. [6 ]
Kennergren, Charles [7 ]
Epstein, Laurence M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Providence St Joseph Med Ctr, Burbank, CA USA
[4] Univ Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Med, Pisa, Italy
[5] Univ Brescia, Spedali Civili, Dept Cardiol, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[6] Univ Penn, Div Cardiovasc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
关键词
lead extraction; LV pacing; lead management; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03353.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objective: Active fixation coronary sinus (CS) leads limit dislodgement and represent an attractive option to the implanter. Although extraction of passive fixation CS leads is a common and frequently uncomplicated procedure, data regarding extraction of chronically implanted active fixation CS leads are limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing active fixation CS lead extraction at six centers. Patient and procedural characteristics, indications for extraction, use of extraction sheath (ES) assistance, and outcomes are reported. Results: Between January 2009 and February 2011, 12 patients underwent transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of Medtronic StarFix (R) lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The cohort was 83% male with mean age 71 +/- 14 years. Average implant duration was 14.2 +/- 5.7 months (2.323.6). All leads but one were removed for infectious indications (67% systemic infection). At the time of explant, the fixation lobes were completely retracted in only one of the 12 cases and ES assistance was required for lead removal in all cases (58% laser, 25% cutting, 25% mechanical, and 25% femoral). The majority of cases required advancement of the sheath into the CS (75.0%) and often into a branch vessel (41.7%). One lead could not be removed transvenously and required surgical lead extraction. There were no major complications. Examination of the leads after extraction frequently revealed significant tissue growth into the fixation lobes. Conclusions: Although TLE of active fixation CS leads can be a safe procedure in select patients and experienced hands, powered sheaths and aggressive techniques are frequently required for successful removal despite relatively short implant durations. This raises significant concern regarding future TLE of active fixation CS leads with longer implant durations. (PACE 2012; 35:641647)
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 647
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coronary Sinus Lead Extraction
    Cronin, Edmond M.
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2017, 13 (01) : 105 - +
  • [42] Coronary sinus lead extraction
    Tyers, GFO
    Clark, J
    Wang, Y
    Mills, P
    Bashir, J
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (01): : 524 - 526
  • [43] Coronary sinus lead extraction
    Tyers, GFO
    Clark, J
    Karim, S
    Mills, P
    Bashir, J
    CLINICAL CARDIAC PACING AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, : 741 - 743
  • [44] Bipolar active fixation left ventricular lead or quadripolar passive fixation lead? An Italian multicenter experience
    Ziacchi, Matteo
    Giannola, Gabriele
    Lunati, Maurizio
    Infusino, Tommaso
    Luzzi, Giovanni
    Rordorf, Roberto
    Pecora, Domenico
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    De Ruvo, Ermenegildo
    Biffi, Mauro
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (04) : 192 - 200
  • [45] Improved electrical performance/stability of a novel active fixation coronary sinus lead compared to passive fixation leads: a multi-centre study
    Gerontitis, D.
    Wardley, J.
    Chapman, M.
    Zegard, A.
    Sammut, E.
    Bates, M.
    Waddingham, P.
    Diab, I.
    Chow, A.
    Leyva, F.
    Turley, A.
    Williams, I.
    Ullah, W.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3551 - 3551
  • [46] UPDATE ON TRANSVENOUS COUNTERTRACTION LEAD EXTRACTION EXPERIENCE
    BYRD, CL
    SCHWARTZ, SJ
    CIRALDO, RJ
    SIVINA, M
    YAHR, WZ
    GREENBERG, JJ
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 10 (03): : 654 - 654
  • [47] UPDATE ON TRANSVENOUS COUNTERTRACTION LEAD EXTRACTION EXPERIENCE
    BYRD, CL
    SCHWARTZ, SJ
    CIRALDO, RJ
    SIVINA, M
    YAHR, WZ
    GREENBERG, JJ
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 10 (02): : 443 - 443
  • [48] Transvenous lead extraction: Experience of the Tandem approach
    Akhtar, Zaki
    Kontogiannis, Christos
    Elbatran, Ahmed, I
    Leung, Lisa W. M.
    Starck, Christoph T.
    Zuberi, Zia
    Sohal, Manav
    Gallagher, Mark M.
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (11):
  • [49] OUTCOMES OF TEMPORARY ACTIVE-FIXATION LEAD IMPLANTATION AFTER TRANSVENOUS LEAD EXTRACTION IN PACEMAKER DEPENDENT PATIENTS
    Koman, Eduard
    Gupta, Ashwani
    Subzposh, Faiz
    Fridman, David
    McCaffrey, James
    Saltzman, Heath
    Kutalek, Steven
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : A324 - A324
  • [50] Coronary sinus lead extraction. The single centre experience of 145 procedures and 153 CS located ingrown leads
    Kutarski, A.
    Malecka, B.
    Zabek, A.
    Czajkowski, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 : 12 - 12