Multicenter Experience with Transvenous Lead Extraction of Active Fixation Coronary Sinus Leads

被引:37
|
作者
Maytin, Melanie [1 ]
Carrillo, Roger G. [2 ]
Baltodano, Pablo [2 ]
Schaerf, Raymond H. M. [3 ]
Bongiorni, Maria G. [4 ]
Di Cori, Andrea [4 ]
Curnis, Antonio [5 ]
Cooper, Joshua M. [6 ]
Kennergren, Charles [7 ]
Epstein, Laurence M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Providence St Joseph Med Ctr, Burbank, CA USA
[4] Univ Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Med, Pisa, Italy
[5] Univ Brescia, Spedali Civili, Dept Cardiol, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[6] Univ Penn, Div Cardiovasc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
关键词
lead extraction; LV pacing; lead management; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03353.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objective: Active fixation coronary sinus (CS) leads limit dislodgement and represent an attractive option to the implanter. Although extraction of passive fixation CS leads is a common and frequently uncomplicated procedure, data regarding extraction of chronically implanted active fixation CS leads are limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing active fixation CS lead extraction at six centers. Patient and procedural characteristics, indications for extraction, use of extraction sheath (ES) assistance, and outcomes are reported. Results: Between January 2009 and February 2011, 12 patients underwent transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of Medtronic StarFix (R) lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The cohort was 83% male with mean age 71 +/- 14 years. Average implant duration was 14.2 +/- 5.7 months (2.323.6). All leads but one were removed for infectious indications (67% systemic infection). At the time of explant, the fixation lobes were completely retracted in only one of the 12 cases and ES assistance was required for lead removal in all cases (58% laser, 25% cutting, 25% mechanical, and 25% femoral). The majority of cases required advancement of the sheath into the CS (75.0%) and often into a branch vessel (41.7%). One lead could not be removed transvenously and required surgical lead extraction. There were no major complications. Examination of the leads after extraction frequently revealed significant tissue growth into the fixation lobes. Conclusions: Although TLE of active fixation CS leads can be a safe procedure in select patients and experienced hands, powered sheaths and aggressive techniques are frequently required for successful removal despite relatively short implant durations. This raises significant concern regarding future TLE of active fixation CS leads with longer implant durations. (PACE 2012; 35:641647)
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 647
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The northern experience in transvenous lead extraction
    Hoong, P. Yuen
    Nabilah, A. Fatin
    Ummu'atiqah, N.
    Fatihin, A. R.
    Haji, M. Namirah
    Soon, L. Kai
    Yean, K. Huan
    Kenneth, K.
    Rao, N. Kantha
    Saravanan, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 397
  • [32] Extraction of old His bundle pacing leads and coronary sinus leads - an analysis of 3897 lead extraction procedures including 27 His and 253 coronary sinus lead removals
    Kutarski, A.
    Jachec, W.
    Stefanczyk, P.
    Dabrowski, P.
    Glowniak, A.
    Nowosielecka, D.
    Tulecki, L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [33] Removal of Active-Fixation Coronary Sinus Leads using a Mechanical Rotation Extraction Device (Cook Evolution©)
    Kypta, A.
    Blessberger, H.
    Saleh, K.
    Hoeenig, S.
    Kammler, J.
    Steinwender, C.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2014, 126 : S96 - S97
  • [34] Large, Single-Center Experience in Transvenous Coronary Sinus Lead Extraction: Procedural Outcomes and Predictors for Mechanical Dilatation
    Di Cori, Andrea
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Zucchelli, Giulio
    Segreti, Luca
    Viani, Stefano
    De Lucia, Raffaele
    Paperini, Luca
    Soldati, Ezio
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (02): : 215 - 222
  • [35] A Modified Transvenous Single Mechanical Dilatation Technique to Remove a Chronically Implanted Active-Fixation Coronary Sinus Pacing Lead
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Di Cori, Andrea
    Zucchelli, Giulio
    Segreti, Luca
    De Lucia, Raffaele
    Paperini, Luca
    Soldati, Ezio
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (07): : E66 - E69
  • [36] Transvenous coronary sinus and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction: different difficulties and complications
    Dovellini, E. V.
    Giurlani, L.
    Corsi, P.
    Michelucci, A.
    Cerisano, G. P.
    Valenti, R.
    Antoniucci, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 172 - 172
  • [37] Extraction of Coronary Sinus Lead: A Large Single Center Experience
    Carrillo, Roger G.
    Garisto, Juan D.
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [38] The Active Fixation Coronary Sinus Lead: More Peril than Promise?
    Kalahasty, Gautham
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (06): : 639 - 640
  • [39] Removal of a chronically implanted active-fixation coronary sinus pacing lead using the Cook EvolutionA© lead extraction sheath
    Kypta, Alexander
    Hoenig, Simon
    Steinwender, Clemens
    EUROPACE, 2014, 16 (05): : 625 - 625
  • [40] Transvenous extraction and reimplantation procedures for quadripolar left ventricular leads with an active fixation side helix
    Nomura, Takehiro
    Isawa, Tsuyoshi
    Toyoda, Shigeru
    Yamashita, Kennosuke
    Honda, Taku
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2024, 40 (05) : 1206 - 1209