Genetic analysis of bud necrosis disease caused by groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicumL.)

被引:9
|
作者
Rai, Amarjeet Kumar [1 ]
Sadashiva, Avverahally Thammanna [1 ]
Basavaraj, Y. B. [2 ]
Venugopalan, Rangarajan [3 ]
Rao, Eguru Sreenivasa [1 ]
Nandeesha, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Vegetable Crops, Bengaluru, India
[2] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Plant Pathol, New Delhi, India
[3] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Agr Stat, Bengaluru, India
[4] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Biotechnol, Bengaluru, India
关键词
Genetic analysis; bud necrosis disease (BND); tospovirus; tomato; SPOTTED-WILT-VIRUS; RESISTANCE; TOSPOVIRUS; PEANUT; RICE; ATTRIBUTES; MANAGEMENT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-020-02657-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the present study for the first-time genetics and nature of gene action for resistance to bud necrosis disease in tomato was deciphered based on mechanical sap inoculation under the environment-controlled glasshouse conditions with the pure culture of GBNV. To accomplish this study, two resistant (IIHR-2901 and IIHR-2953) and one susceptible parent (PKM-1) were used to generate F-1, F-2, BC(1)P(1)and BC(1)P(2)populations. Castle wright estimation suggested that the trait is governed by the single gene blocks in both the crosses. Chi-square estimation also indicated that the resistance to bud necrosis disease in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2901 is controlled by one or two recessive genes while in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2953, it was found to be governed by one or two dominant genes based on the segregation pattern observed in F(2)generation. However, the results remain inconclusive, as the segregation in backcrosses was not behaving as expected for both the crosses. This showed that the classical Mendelian genetics and additive-dominance model were inadequate to explain the genetical mechanism of resistance to bud necrosis disease of tomato. It may be either due to the presence of modifiers in the background or may be due to the presence of epistatic interactions. Later, in this study presence of epistatic interaction was confirmed by the significance of scaling test in both the crosses. Estimates of six parameters [m, d, h, i, j and l] through generation mean analysis, suggested the preponderance of non-allelic interactions mostly of additive x dominance [j] type with negative signs in both the crosses and additive x additive [i] interaction with positive sign in the cross between PKM-1 x IIHR-2953. Complementary type of epistasis has been observed for both the crosses as both the componentsviz.,dominance [h] and dominance x dominance [l] were in similar direction. Hence, all the above results indicated that the improvement for resistance to bud necrosis disease could be possible through recombination breeding, hybridization followed by selection at later generations with more emphasis on selection between families and lines.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] First report of Groundnut bud necrosis virus infecting onion (Allium cepa)
    A. Sujitha
    B. V. Bhaskara Reddy
    Y. Sivaprasad
    R. Usha
    D. V. R. Sai Gopal
    Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 2012, 7 (1) : 183 - 187
  • [32] Investigations on the RNA binding and phosphorylation of groundnut bud necrosis virus nucleocapsid protein
    Bhat, Amruta S.
    Savithri, H. S.
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2011, 156 (12) : 2163 - 2172
  • [33] First report of Groundnut bud necrosis virus infecting onion (Allium cepa)
    Sujitha, A.
    Reddy, B. V. Bhaskara
    Sivaprasad, Y.
    Usha, R.
    Gopal, D. V. R. Sai
    AUSTRALASIAN PLANT DISEASE NOTES, 2012, 7 (01): : 183 - 187
  • [34] Investigations on the RNA binding and phosphorylation of groundnut bud necrosis virus nucleocapsid protein
    Amruta S. Bhat
    H. S. Savithri
    Archives of Virology, 2011, 156 : 2163 - 2172
  • [35] First Report of Groundnut bud necrosis virus Infecting Parthenium hysterophorus in India
    Vemana, K.
    Khureshi, C. S. M.
    Padma, J. G.
    Shabbir, S.
    Goud, T. E. Seshadri
    Johnson, A. M. Anthony
    Naik, K. S. S.
    Reddy, D. L.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2015, 99 (09) : 1287 - 1287
  • [36] First report of Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus infecting Taro (Colocasia esculenta)
    Sivaprasad Y.
    Reddy B.V.B.
    Kumar C.V.M.N.
    Reddy K.R.
    Gopal D.V.R.S.
    Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 2011, 6 (1) : 30 - 32
  • [37] NSs encoded by Peanut bud necrosis virus (tomato) is a multifunctional enzyme
    Bhushan, Lokesh
    Srisathiyanarayanan, D.
    Bhat, Amruta S.
    Savithri, H. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2008, 19 (01): : 101 - 101
  • [38] Morphological and biochemical resistance traits of tomato cultivars against thrips and bud necrosis virus disease
    B Jamuna
    M Bheemanna
    Hn Timmanna
    Arunkumar Hosmani
    Kandapal Kavita
    International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 2021, 41 : 2957 - 2964
  • [39] Harnessing Nanoencapsulated Bacillus spp. Consortia To Combat Groundnut Bud Necrosis Orthotospovirus in Tomato
    Kishorkumar C.
    Harish S.
    Karthikeyan G.
    Sharmila D.J.S.
    Nivedha M.
    ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2024, 16 (09): : 11185 - 11193
  • [40] Nucleocapsid protein gene mediated resistance against groundnut bud necrosis virus in tomato using sense and antisense constructs
    Raja, P.
    Jain, R. K.
    ACTA VIROLOGICA, 2011, 55 (03) : 283 - 284