Genetic analysis of bud necrosis disease caused by groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicumL.)

被引:9
|
作者
Rai, Amarjeet Kumar [1 ]
Sadashiva, Avverahally Thammanna [1 ]
Basavaraj, Y. B. [2 ]
Venugopalan, Rangarajan [3 ]
Rao, Eguru Sreenivasa [1 ]
Nandeesha, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Vegetable Crops, Bengaluru, India
[2] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Plant Pathol, New Delhi, India
[3] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Agr Stat, Bengaluru, India
[4] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Biotechnol, Bengaluru, India
关键词
Genetic analysis; bud necrosis disease (BND); tospovirus; tomato; SPOTTED-WILT-VIRUS; RESISTANCE; TOSPOVIRUS; PEANUT; RICE; ATTRIBUTES; MANAGEMENT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-020-02657-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the present study for the first-time genetics and nature of gene action for resistance to bud necrosis disease in tomato was deciphered based on mechanical sap inoculation under the environment-controlled glasshouse conditions with the pure culture of GBNV. To accomplish this study, two resistant (IIHR-2901 and IIHR-2953) and one susceptible parent (PKM-1) were used to generate F-1, F-2, BC(1)P(1)and BC(1)P(2)populations. Castle wright estimation suggested that the trait is governed by the single gene blocks in both the crosses. Chi-square estimation also indicated that the resistance to bud necrosis disease in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2901 is controlled by one or two recessive genes while in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2953, it was found to be governed by one or two dominant genes based on the segregation pattern observed in F(2)generation. However, the results remain inconclusive, as the segregation in backcrosses was not behaving as expected for both the crosses. This showed that the classical Mendelian genetics and additive-dominance model were inadequate to explain the genetical mechanism of resistance to bud necrosis disease of tomato. It may be either due to the presence of modifiers in the background or may be due to the presence of epistatic interactions. Later, in this study presence of epistatic interaction was confirmed by the significance of scaling test in both the crosses. Estimates of six parameters [m, d, h, i, j and l] through generation mean analysis, suggested the preponderance of non-allelic interactions mostly of additive x dominance [j] type with negative signs in both the crosses and additive x additive [i] interaction with positive sign in the cross between PKM-1 x IIHR-2953. Complementary type of epistasis has been observed for both the crosses as both the componentsviz.,dominance [h] and dominance x dominance [l] were in similar direction. Hence, all the above results indicated that the improvement for resistance to bud necrosis disease could be possible through recombination breeding, hybridization followed by selection at later generations with more emphasis on selection between families and lines.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] First report of groundnut bud necrosis virus natural occurrence in Solanum nigrum L. in India
    Amruta S. Bhat
    Vanipenta Laxmidevi
    M. Krishna Reddy
    Journal of Plant Pathology, 2020, 102 : 1285 - 1285
  • [22] First report of natural occurrence of groundnut bud necrosis virus in Solanum torvum Sw. in India
    Kumari, Shweta
    Nagendran, Krishnan
    Dubey, Vikas
    Manimurugan, Chinnappa
    Singh, Achuit Kumar
    Rai, Awadhesh Bahadur
    Singh, Bijendra
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2019, 101 (01) : 185 - 185
  • [23] Exposure to watermelon bud necrosis virus and groundnut bud necrosis virus alters the life history traits of their vector, Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)
    Ghosh, Amalendu
    Basavaraj, Y. B.
    Jangra, Sumit
    Das, Amrita
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2019, 164 (11) : 2799 - 2804
  • [24] Exposure to watermelon bud necrosis virus and groundnut bud necrosis virus alters the life history traits of their vector, Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)
    Amalendu Ghosh
    Y. B. Basavaraj
    Sumit Jangra
    Amrita Das
    Archives of Virology, 2019, 164 : 2799 - 2804
  • [25] Generation means analysis of resistance to peanut bud necrosis caused by peanut bud necrosis tospovirus in peanut
    Pensuk, V
    Jogloy, S
    Wongkaew, S
    Patanothai, A
    PLANT BREEDING, 2004, 123 (01) : 90 - 92
  • [26] Studies on Peanut bud necrosis virus affecting tomato in India
    Gandhi, K.
    Pandian, V.
    Manoranjitham, S. K.
    Chandrasekar, G.
    Samiyappan, R.
    Jonathan, E. I.
    Naidu, R. A.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) : S58 - S58
  • [27] Diagnostic assays for two closely related tospovirus species, Watermelon bud necrosis virus and Groundnut bud necrosis virus and identification of new natural hosts
    Somnath Kadappa Holkar
    R. Kumar
    M. Yogita
    A. Katiyar
    R. K. Jain
    Bikash Mandal
    Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2017, 26 : 43 - 51
  • [28] Diagnostic assays for two closely related tospovirus species, Watermelon bud necrosis virus and Groundnut bud necrosis virus and identification of new natural hosts
    Holkar, Somnath Kadappa
    Kumar, R.
    Yogita, M.
    Katiyar, A.
    Jain, R. K.
    Mandal, Bikash
    JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 26 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [29] Genetic Analysis for Peanut bud necrosis virus (PBNV) Resistance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)
    Ramana, C. Venkata
    Rao, P. Venkata
    Rao, R. D. V. J. Prasada
    Kumar, S. S.
    Reddy, I. P.
    Reddy, Y. N.
    III INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TOMATO DISEASES, 2011, 914 : 459 - 463
  • [30] Deciphering the antiviral nature of endophytic Bacillus spp. against groundnut bud necrosis virus in cowpea and tomato
    Gayathri, M.
    Sharanya, R.
    Renukadevi, P.
    Nakkeeran, S.
    Saranya, N.
    Varanavasiappan, S.
    Raveendran, M.
    Suhail, A.
    Alkahtani, Saad
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 15