Nationwide survey of fluoroscopy: Radiation dose and image quality

被引:18
|
作者
Suleiman, OH
Conway, BJ
Quinn, P
Antonsen, RG
Rueter, FG
Slayton, RJ
Spelic, DC
机构
[1] Ctr. Devices and Radiological Hlth., U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Ctr. Devices and Radiological Hlth., Div. Mammography Qual. Radiat. P., Rockville, MD 20850
关键词
fluoroscopy; technology; gastrointestinal tract; radiography; phantoms; radiations; exposure to patients and personnel; measurement; test objects;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114107
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the average abdominal entrance air kerma, low-contrast sensitivity, and spatial resolution in upper gastrointestinal tract fluoroscopy in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample of fluoroscopic facilities was selected to be surveyed for the Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends program. Measurements were performed by using a newly developed fluoroscopic phantom. The surveys were conducted by state radiation control personnel. RESULTS: Average air kerma rates 1 cm above the tabletop, free in air, were 43 mGy/min (n = 340). The rate increased to 64 mGy/min when a 1.6-mm-thick copper filter, which simulated the use of barium contrast medium, was added to increase attenuation. The average entrance air kerma, free in air, for radiographs was 3.4 mGy, and an average of 12 radiographs were obtained per examination. Of 352 facilities surveyed, 306 (87%) were able to resolve wire mesh with 20 or more lines per inch. Of 339 facilities for which percentage contrast could be calculated, 192 (57%) had minimum percentage contrast values of 4% or more. CONCLUSION: Spatial resolution for fluoroscopy is adequate for most of the facilities surveyed, but a substantial proportion of facilities could not visualize low-contrast test objects, which strongly suggests image quality problems.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 476
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improvement of image quality and dose management in CT fluoroscopy by iterative 3D image reconstruction
    Grosser, Oliver S.
    Wybranski, Christian
    Kupitz, Dennis
    Powerski, Maciej
    Mohnike, Konrad
    Pech, Maciej
    Amthauer, Holger
    Ricke, Jens
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (09) : 3625 - 3634
  • [42] Improvement of image quality and dose management in CT fluoroscopy by iterative 3D image reconstruction
    Oliver S. Grosser
    Christian Wybranski
    Dennis Kupitz
    Maciej Powerski
    Konrad Mohnike
    Maciej Pech
    Holger Amthauer
    Jens Ricke
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 3625 - 3634
  • [43] Operation logic and functionality of automatic dose rate and image quality control of conventional fluoroscopy
    Lin, Pei-Jan Paul
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (05) : 1486 - 1493
  • [44] Effect of additional filtration on radiation dose and image quality
    Gai, Xinghui
    Yang, Dewu
    Li, Xunru
    Sui, Yan
    Liu, Kang
    Wang, Junying
    Zhao, Mengjuan
    2022 IEEE 6TH ADVANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IAEAC), 2022, : 1807 - 1811
  • [45] Balancing radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic imagingq
    Honey, Ian
    Hogg, Peter
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2012, 18 (01) : E1 - E2
  • [46] Radiation dose and image quality in head CT examinations
    Huda, W
    Chang, J
    Lieberman, KA
    Roskopf, ML
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 160 - 160
  • [47] Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology
    Vano, E.
    Ubeda, C.
    Leyton, F.
    Miranda, P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (15): : 4049 - 4062
  • [48] IMAGE QUALITY FACTORS AND RADIATION-DOSE IN MAMMOGRAPHY
    HAUS, AG
    ERICKSON, L
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 10 (01): : 29 - 35
  • [49] Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric Neck CT
    Tipnis, S. V.
    Rieter, W. J.
    Patel, D.
    Stalcup, S. T.
    Matheus, M. G.
    Spampinato, M. V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2019, 40 (06) : 1067 - 1073
  • [50] CT protocols: balancing radiation dose and image quality
    Richard Fotter
    Pediatric Radiology, 2011, 41 : 215 - 216