Adenosine testing during cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: A propensity score-matched analysis

被引:27
|
作者
Tokuda, Michifumi [1 ]
Matsuo, Seiichiro [1 ]
Isogai, Ryota [1 ]
Uno, Goki [1 ]
Tokutake, Kenichi [1 ]
Yokoyama, Kenichi [1 ]
Kato, Mika [1 ]
Narui, Ryohsuke [1 ]
Tanigawa, Shinichi [1 ]
Yamashita, Seigo [1 ]
Inada, Keiichi [1 ]
Yoshimura, Michihiro [1 ]
Yamane, Teiichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cardiol, Minato Ku, 3-25-8 Nishi Shinbashi, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Ablation; Radiofrequency; Cryoballoon; Dormant conduction; Pulmonary vein; Adenosine; Outcome; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; 2ND-GENERATION CRYOBALLOON; CATHETER ABLATION; CONDUCTION; RECONNECTIONS; PREDICTORS; RECURRENCE; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.018
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The infusion of adenosine triphosphate after radio-frequency (RF) pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI), which may result in acute transient PV-atrium reconnection, can unmask dormant conduction. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence and characteristics of dormant conduction after cryoballoon (CB) and RF ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS Of 414 consecutive patients undergoing initial catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF, 246 (59%) propensity score-matched patients (123 CB-PVI and 123 RF-PVI) were included. RESULTS Dormant conduction was less frequently observed in patients who underwent CB-PVI than in those who underwent RF-PVI (4.5% vs 12.8% of all PVs; P < .0001). The incidence of dormant conduction in each PV was lower in patients who underwent CB-PVI than in those who underwent RF-PVI in the left superior PV (P < .0001) and right superior PV (P = .001). The site of dormant conduction was mainly located around the bottom of both inferior PVs after CB-PVI. Multivariable analysis revealed that a longer time to the elimination of the PV potential (odds ratio 1.018; 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.036; P =.04) and the necessity of touch-up ablation (odds ratio 3.242; 95% confidence interval 2.761-7.111; P < .0001) were independently associated with the presence of dormant conduction after CB-PVI. After the elimination of dormant conduction by additional ablation, the AF free rate was similar in patients with and without dormant conduction after both CB-PVI and RF-PVI (P = .28 and P = .73, respectively). CONCLUSION The results of the propensity score-matched analysis showed that dormant PV conduction was less frequent after CB ablation than after RF ablation and was not associated with ablation outcomes. (C) 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2128 / 2134
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Headache during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Pison, Laurent
    Peeters, Pim
    Blaauw, Yuri
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Kumar, Narendra
    Philippens, Suzanne
    Crijns, Harry J.
    Vlaeyen, Johan
    Schoenen, Jean
    Timmermans, Carl
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2015, 17 (06): : 898 - 901
  • [42] The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
    Ang, Richard
    Domenichini, Giulia
    Finlay, Malcolm C.
    Schilling, Richard J.
    Hunter, Ross J.
    [J]. CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (09)
  • [43] The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
    Richard Ang
    Giulia Domenichini
    Malcolm C. Finlay
    Richard J. Schilling
    Ross J. Hunter
    [J]. Current Cardiology Reports, 2015, 17
  • [44] Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in HFpEF patients-A propensity-score-matched analysis
    Rattka, Manuel
    Kuehberger, Anna
    Pott, Alexander
    Stephan, Tilman
    Weinmann, Karolina
    Baumhardt, Michael
    Aktolga, Deniz
    Teumer, Yannick
    Bothner, Carlo
    Scharnbeck, Dominik
    Rottbauer, Wolfgang
    Dahme, Tillman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (09) : 2357 - 2367
  • [45] Ablation index guide pulmonary vein isolation can reduce early recurrence of atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Yasumoto, K.
    Egami, Y.
    Ukita, K.
    Yanagawa, K.
    Nakamura, H.
    Matsuhiro, Y.
    Tsuda, M.
    Okamoto, N.
    Tanaka, A.
    Matsunaga-Lee, Y.
    Yano, M.
    Yamato, M.
    Shutta, R.
    Nishino, M.
    Tanouchi, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 575 - 575
  • [46] Esophagogastric complications in radiofrequency and cryoballoon catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Oikawa, Jun
    Fukaya, Hidehira
    Wada, Takuya
    Kishihara, Jun
    Sato, Tetsuro
    Matsuura, Gen
    Nakamura, Hironori
    Ishizue, Naruya
    Katada, Chikatoshi
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Niwano, Shinichi
    Kusano, Chika
    Ako, Junya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (06) : 1160 - 1166
  • [47] Radiofrequency current or cryoballoon for ablation of atrial fibrillation? Hot or cold?
    Reissmann, B.
    Kuck, K. -H.
    Metzner, A.
    [J]. HERZ, 2017, 42 (04) : 352 - 356
  • [48] Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
    Wasserlauf, Jeremiah
    Pelchovitz, Daniel J.
    Rhyner, John
    Verma, Nishant
    Bohn, Martha
    Li, Zhi
    Arora, Rishi
    Chicos, Alexandru B.
    Goldberger, Jeffrey J.
    Kim, Susan S.
    Lin, Albert C.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    Passman, Rod S.
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (04): : 483 - 489
  • [49] Comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation techniques for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
    Maltoni, Susanna
    Negro, Antonella
    Camerlingo, Maria D.
    Pecoraro, Valentina
    Sassone, Biagio
    Biffi, Mauro
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (12) : 725 - 738
  • [50] Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
    Cardoso, Rhanderson
    Mendirichaga, Rodrigo
    Fernandes, Gilson
    Healy, Chris
    Lambrakos, Litsa K.
    Viles-Gonzalez, Juan F.
    Goldberger, Jeffrey J.
    Mitrani, Raul D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (10) : 1151 - 1159