Investigations of the sensitivity of ornamental, fruit, and nut plant species to driftable rates of 2,4-D and dicamba

被引:22
|
作者
Dintelmann, Brian R. [1 ]
Warmund, Michele R. [1 ]
Bish, Mandy D. [1 ]
Bradley, Kevin W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Plant Sci, 5 Waters Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Herbicide injury; trees; drift; off-target movement; VITIS-VINIFERA RESPONSE; SIMULATED DRIFT; WEED-CONTROL; SPRAY DRIFT; WIND-SPEED; RED MAPLE; HERBICIDE; GROWTH; RESISTANCE; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2019.118
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
An experiment was conducted in 2017 and 2018 to determine the sensitivity of driftable rates of 2,4-D and dicamba with or without glyphosate on common ornamental, fruit, and nut species. Three driftable rates corresponding to 1/2, 1/20th, and 1/200th of the manufacturer's labeled rate (1 x rate) of 2,4-D (1.09 kg ae ha(-1)), 2,4-D plus glyphosate (1.09 kg ae ha(-1) plus 1.10 kg ae ha(-1)), dicamba (0.56 kg ae ha(-1)), and dicamba plus glyphosate (0.56 kg ae ha(-1) plus L10 kg ae h(-1)) were applied to apple, crabapple, dogwood, American elderberry, American elm, grapevine, hydrangea, red maple, pin oak, peach, pecan, eastern redbud, rose, red raspberry, strawberry, sweetgum, nannyberry viburnum, and black walnut plants. Visible estimates of injury were recorded 28 and 56 days after treatment (DAT). Plant measurements included leaf malformation, tree trunk growth, and shoot length. Across all species, the 1/2 x rate of 2,4-D plus glyphosate resulted in 61% injury 28 DAT, whereas the' x rate of dicamba plus glyphosate resulted in 51% injury. Across plant species and herbicides, 1/2 x, 1/20 x, and 1/200 x rates caused injury ranging from 3% to 100%, 0% to 66%, and 0% to 19%, respectively. Hydrangea was the least sensitive species; grapevine was most sensitive. Changes in plant measurements were dependent on the species and herbicide applied. Treatments at the 1/2 x or 1/20 x rate resulted in shoot length, leaf malformation, and trunk tree diameter differences for 11, 10, and 7 species, respectively, compared with nontreated plants. Collectively, the measurements and visual injury assessments indicated apple, red maple, peach, and pin oak were more sensitive to treatments containing dicamba, whereas black walnut, grapevine, and American elm were more sensitive to 2,4-D. Although the 1/200 x rates of 2,4-D and dicamba did not result in changes to plant measurements, obvious injury symptoms were observed, which could render these plants unsalable.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 341
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of soybean growth stage on sensitivity to sublethal rates of dicamba and 2,4-D
    Scholtes, Alanna B.
    Sperry, Benjamin P.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    Irby, J. Trenton
    Eubank, Thomas W.
    Barber, L. Thomas
    Dodds, Darrin M.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (04) : 555 - 561
  • [2] SENSITIVITY OF FIELDBEANS (PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS) TO REDUCED RATES OF 2,4-D AND DICAMBA
    LYON, DJ
    WILSON, RG
    WEED SCIENCE, 1986, 34 (06) : 953 - 956
  • [3] Annual flower injury from sublethal rates of dicamba, 2,4-D, and premixed 2,4-D + mecoprop plus dicamba
    Hatterman-Valenti, H
    Mayland, P
    HORTSCIENCE, 2005, 40 (03) : 680 - 684
  • [4] Sensitivity of dry edible bean to dicamba and 2,4-D
    Bales, Scott R.
    Sprague, Christy L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) : 117 - 124
  • [5] Response of Wine Grape Cultivars to Simulated Drift Rates of 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Glyphosate, and 2,4-D or Dicamba Plus Glyphosate
    Mohseni-Moghadam, Mohsen
    Wolfe, Scott
    Dami, Imed
    Doohan, Douglas
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 807 - 814
  • [6] Visual Injury of Selected Fruit and Nut Plants to Driftable Fractions of Dicamba, 2-4D, and Glyphosate
    Warmund, Michele
    Dintelmann, Brian
    Bradley, Kevin
    Bish, Mandy
    HORTSCIENCE, 2018, 53 (09) : S329 - S330
  • [7] APPLICATOR EXPOSURE TO 2,4-D, DICAMBA, AND A DICAMBA ISOMER
    DRAPER, WM
    STREET, JC
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 1982, 17 (04) : 321 - 339
  • [8] CROP SENSITIVITY TO DICAMBA AND 2,4-D APPLIED AT COMMERCIAL AND SUBDOSE LEVELS
    Boteon, Beatriz Fogolari
    da Silva, Rafaela Oliva
    Schedenffeldt, Bruna Ferrari
    Spricigo, Henrique
    Hirata, Andrea Cristina Silva
    Monquero, Patricia Andrea
    AGROCIENCIA, 2024, 58 (02)
  • [9] Baseline Sensitivity of Nebraska Waterhemp and Palmer Amaranth to Dicamba and 2,4-D
    Crespo, Roberto J.
    Wingeyer, Ana B.
    Borman, Christopher J.
    Bernards, Mark L.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2016, 108 (04) : 1649 - 1655
  • [10] Pumpkin Injury and Yield Response to Low Rates of 2,4-D Choline and Dicamba
    Chen, Xinzheng
    Jhala, Amit
    Knezevic, Stevan
    Wortman, Sam E.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2024, 59 (03) : 288 - 293