Investigations of the sensitivity of ornamental, fruit, and nut plant species to driftable rates of 2,4-D and dicamba

被引:22
|
作者
Dintelmann, Brian R. [1 ]
Warmund, Michele R. [1 ]
Bish, Mandy D. [1 ]
Bradley, Kevin W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Plant Sci, 5 Waters Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Herbicide injury; trees; drift; off-target movement; VITIS-VINIFERA RESPONSE; SIMULATED DRIFT; WEED-CONTROL; SPRAY DRIFT; WIND-SPEED; RED MAPLE; HERBICIDE; GROWTH; RESISTANCE; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2019.118
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
An experiment was conducted in 2017 and 2018 to determine the sensitivity of driftable rates of 2,4-D and dicamba with or without glyphosate on common ornamental, fruit, and nut species. Three driftable rates corresponding to 1/2, 1/20th, and 1/200th of the manufacturer's labeled rate (1 x rate) of 2,4-D (1.09 kg ae ha(-1)), 2,4-D plus glyphosate (1.09 kg ae ha(-1) plus 1.10 kg ae ha(-1)), dicamba (0.56 kg ae ha(-1)), and dicamba plus glyphosate (0.56 kg ae ha(-1) plus L10 kg ae h(-1)) were applied to apple, crabapple, dogwood, American elderberry, American elm, grapevine, hydrangea, red maple, pin oak, peach, pecan, eastern redbud, rose, red raspberry, strawberry, sweetgum, nannyberry viburnum, and black walnut plants. Visible estimates of injury were recorded 28 and 56 days after treatment (DAT). Plant measurements included leaf malformation, tree trunk growth, and shoot length. Across all species, the 1/2 x rate of 2,4-D plus glyphosate resulted in 61% injury 28 DAT, whereas the' x rate of dicamba plus glyphosate resulted in 51% injury. Across plant species and herbicides, 1/2 x, 1/20 x, and 1/200 x rates caused injury ranging from 3% to 100%, 0% to 66%, and 0% to 19%, respectively. Hydrangea was the least sensitive species; grapevine was most sensitive. Changes in plant measurements were dependent on the species and herbicide applied. Treatments at the 1/2 x or 1/20 x rate resulted in shoot length, leaf malformation, and trunk tree diameter differences for 11, 10, and 7 species, respectively, compared with nontreated plants. Collectively, the measurements and visual injury assessments indicated apple, red maple, peach, and pin oak were more sensitive to treatments containing dicamba, whereas black walnut, grapevine, and American elm were more sensitive to 2,4-D. Although the 1/200 x rates of 2,4-D and dicamba did not result in changes to plant measurements, obvious injury symptoms were observed, which could render these plants unsalable.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 341
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Soybean tolerance to early preplant applications of 2,4-d ester, 2,4-d amine, and dicamba
    Thompson, M. Angela
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    Ellis, Andrew T.
    Mueller, Thomas C.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) : 882 - 885
  • [22] Response of Common Garden Annuals to Sublethal Rates of 2,4-D and Dicamba with or without Glyphosate
    Dintelmann, Brian
    Trinklein, David
    Bradley, Kevin
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) : 411 - 420
  • [23] Determination of 2,4-D and Dicamba in food crops by MEKC
    F. M. Lanças
    S. R. Rissato
    M. S. Galhiane
    Chromatographia, 1999, 50 : 35 - 40
  • [24] Extractability of 2,4-D, dicamba and MCPP from soil
    Atalay, A
    Hwang, KJ
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1999, 114 (1-2): : 155 - 170
  • [25] RESPONSE OF KOCHIA SELECTIONS TO 2,4-D, DICAMBA, AND PICLORAM
    BELL, AR
    SCHOOLER, AB
    NALEWAJA, JD
    WEED SCIENCE, 1972, 20 (05) : 458 - &
  • [26] LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF 2,4-D AND DICAMBA RESIDUES IN SOIL
    VOOS, G
    GROFFMAN, PM
    PFEIL, M
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1994, 42 (11) : 2502 - 2507
  • [27] Sesame Tolerance to Preplant Applications of 2,4-D and Dicamba
    Sperry, Benjamin P.
    Ferrell, Jason A.
    Leon, Ramon G.
    Rowland, Diane L.
    Mulvaney, Michael J.
    Dias, Jose Luiz C. S.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (04) : 590 - 598
  • [28] Extractability of 2,4-D, dicamba and MCPP from soil
    Virginia State University, P.O. Box 9005, Petersburg, VA 23806, United States
    不详
    Water Air Soil Pollut., 1-2 (155-170):
  • [29] The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings
    Rubert, Jaine
    Somavilla, Iuri
    Leichtweiss, Eduard
    Avila Neto, Roberto
    Thomasi, Rosana
    Tarouco, Camila
    Berghetti, Alvaro
    Nicoloso, Fernando
    Ulguim, Andre
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 59
  • [30] MOBILITY OF DICAMBA, PICLORAM AND 2,4-D IN SOIL COLUMNS
    GROVER, R
    WEED SCIENCE, 1977, 25 (02) : 159 - 162