Public opinion spread risk assessment model on third-party payment rough network

被引:3
|
作者
Cao, Lixia [1 ]
Wei, Guo [2 ]
Su, Jia [3 ]
机构
[1] Xian Technol Univ, Sch Sci, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Pembroke, NC USA
[3] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Third-party payment rough network; Public opinion spread; Game theory; Risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106532
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The spread of the public opinion in a third-party payment rough network may endanger the platform's economic stability. Hence, network public opinion spread risk assessment is urgently needed. Unfortunately, there has been no research on this problem. Based on research of the characteristics of the public opinion spread of a third-party payment rough network, we determined that the essence of the public opinion spread risk assessment in a network is to evaluate the important nodes and the risks of customer mining. The paper establishes a node-option model and node-search algorithm based on game theory. The game results show that managers select the customers who buy the degree nodes with the greatest weight as their public opinion customers, and they then perform risk assessment so that they can better determine the risk rating and index weights. The risk ratings and index weights can help managers control and adjust policies related to the spread of public opinion spread to prevent crises. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bayesian network and game theory risk assessment model for third-party damage to oil and gas pipelines
    Cui, Yan
    Quddus, Noor
    Mashuga, Chad V.
    [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 134 : 178 - 188
  • [22] The Revenue Model of Online Third-party Payment Based on Game Theory
    Li, Yiqun
    Zhang, Xuezheng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF E-COMMERCE AND E-GOVERNMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 349 - 353
  • [23] Intelligent Risk Assessment for Pipeline Third-Party Interference
    Hu, Jinqiu
    Zhang, Laibin
    Liang, Wei
    Guo, Cunjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2012, 134 (01):
  • [24] Third-party countries in cyber conflict: Public opinion and conflict spillover in cyberspace
    Gomez, Miguel Alberto
    Winger, Gregory H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [25] Third-party carrier assessment
    Corkhill, M
    [J]. CHEMICAL WEEK, 1996, : T30 - T30
  • [26] Opinion: Independent third-party entities as a model for validation of commercial antibodies
    Laflamme, Carl
    Edwards, Aled M.
    Bandrowski, Anita E.
    McPherson, Peter S.
    [J]. NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 65 : 1 - 8
  • [27] Problems of Third-party Payment in China and Solution Study
    Hu, Qiumei
    [J]. EIGHTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2009, : 51 - 56
  • [28] Analysis Relationship with the Commercial Bank to the Third-party Payment
    Wu, Di
    Zheng, Peng
    [J]. 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND GLOBAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (ISSGBM 20120), VOL 8, 2012, 8 : 224 - +
  • [29] TRANSFERENCE AND COUNTERTRANSFERENCE IN A THIRD-PARTY PAYMENT SYSTEM (HMO)
    GOLDENSOHN, SS
    HAAR, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1974, 131 (03): : 256 - 260
  • [30] Dynamic reliability model for subsea pipeline risk assessment due to third-party interference
    Aulia, Reza
    Tan, Henry
    Sriramula, Srinivas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 1 (03): : 277 - 289