Dynamic reliability model for subsea pipeline risk assessment due to third-party interference

被引:15
|
作者
Aulia, Reza [1 ]
Tan, Henry [1 ]
Sriramula, Srinivas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Engn, Fraser Noble Bldg,Elphinstone Rd, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
来源
关键词
Risk analysis; Subsea pipelines; Bayesian networks; Third-party interference; Dynamic performance; FAULT-TREE ANALYSIS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; NATURAL-GAS; OIL; FAILURE; SAFETY; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpse.2021.09.006
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The accidents of subsea pipelines due to third-party interference often result in catastrophic impacts, therefore, risk assessment has progressively become substantial to ensure the safety and reliability of the systems. However, the current risk analysis approaches are unable to minimize the uncertainties in the analysis due to the high demands of the qualitative inputs. The Bayesian network approach is believed to be able to provide answers to such a problem. The main advantage of this technique is that it allows the inference model and predictive analysis for constructing the current and future performance of the system based on the observed evidence. These can be achieved by introducing the subsea pipeline's accident history and operational data in the model for developing the conditional probability distribution of each variable in the analysis. This paper proposes a dynamic reliability model for subsea pipeline risk assessment due to third-party interference based on the Bayesian approach. This technique is combined with fault tree and the finite element models for producing a reliable risk assessment framework for subsea pipelines. It is expected that the proposed model will be able to minimize the number of qualitative inputs in the analysis and also provides dynamic results for estimating the risk level of the subsea pipeline throughout its service life.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 289
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamic reliability model for subsea pipeline risk assessment due to third party damage
    Aulia, Reza
    Tan, Henry
    Sriramula, Srinivas
    [J]. Proceedings of the 29th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2019, 2020, : 2356 - 2363
  • [2] Intelligent Risk Assessment for Pipeline Third-Party Interference
    Hu, Jinqiu
    Zhang, Laibin
    Liang, Wei
    Guo, Cunjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2012, 134 (01):
  • [3] Pipeline safety management and the prevention of third-party interference
    Sljivic, Sue
    [J]. Pipes and Pipelines International, 1995, 40 (06): : 14 - 16
  • [4] Developing a dynamic model for risk analysis under uncertainty: Case of third-party damage on subsea pipelines
    Li, Xinhong
    Chen, Guoming
    Jiang, Shengyu
    He, Rui
    Xu, Changhang
    Zhu, Hongwei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2018, 54 : 289 - 302
  • [5] Assessing and classifying risk of pipeline third-party interference based on fault tree and SOM
    Liang, Wei
    Hu, Jinqiu
    Zhang, Laibin
    Guo, Cunjie
    Lin, Weipeng
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 25 (03) : 594 - 608
  • [6] RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE THIRD PARTY DAMAGE
    Mehranfar, Mahsa
    Sen, Millan
    Lam, Christopher
    Bott, Steven
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, IPC2022, VOL 1, 2022,
  • [7] Vessel traffic geometric probability approaches with AIS data in active shipping lane for subsea pipeline quantitative risk assessment against third-party impact
    Tanujaya, Vincent Alvin
    Tawekal, Ricky Lukman
    Ilman, Eko Charnius
    [J]. OCEAN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (03): : 267 - 284
  • [8] Third-party carrier assessment
    Corkhill, M
    [J]. CHEMICAL WEEK, 1996, : T30 - T30
  • [9] BaNTERA: A Bayesian Network for Third-Party Excavation Risk Assessment
    Ruiz-Tagle, Andres
    Lewis, Austin D.
    Schell, Colin A.
    Lever, Ernest
    Groth, Katrina M.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 223
  • [10] Public opinion spread risk assessment model on third-party payment rough network
    Cao, Lixia
    Wei, Guo
    Su, Jia
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 95