Cost Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profiling for Early Stage Breast Cancer

被引:60
|
作者
Yang, Mo [1 ,2 ]
Rajan, Suja [1 ,2 ]
Issa, Amalia M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci, Program Personalized Med & Targeted Therapeut, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Coll Pharm, Dept Clin Sci & Adm, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
gene-expression profiling; breast cancer; Markov modeling; cost-effectiveness; health economics; RT-PCR ASSAY; ADJUVANT TRASTUZUMAB; 70-GENE SIGNATURE; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WOMEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY; CARE; LIFE; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.27443
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling (GEP) is being used increasingly for risk stratification to identify women with lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, early stage breast cancer who are most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The authors of this report evaluated the cost effectiveness of recurrence score-guided treatment using 2 commercially available GEP tests, Oncotype DX (Genomic Health, Redwood City, Calif) and MammaPrint (Agendia Inc., Irvine, Calif), from a third-party payer's perspective. METHODS: A 10-year Markov model was developed to compare the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of treatment decisions guided by either Oncotype DX or MammaPrint in a hypothetical cohort of women with early stage, lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who may experience recurrence. Outcomes included no recurrence, recurrence, and death. The costs considered included gene test costs, the costs of adjuvant chemotherapy and other chemotherapy (including premedication, oncology visits, and monitoring for adverse events), the cost of treating recurrence, costs associated with the treatment of adverse events, and end-of-life care costs. RESULTS: The model demonstrated that the patients who received the Oncotype DX test to guide treatment spent $27,882 (in US dollars) and gained 7.364 QALYs, whereas patients who received the MammaPrint test to guide treatment spent $21,598 and gained 7.461 QALYs. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results were robust to changes in all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The model suggested that MammaPrint is a more cost-effective GEP test compared with Oncotype DX at a threshold willingness-to-pay of $50,000 per QALY. Because Oncotype DX is the most frequently used GEP in clinical practice in the United States, the authors concluded that the current findings have implications for health policy, particularly health insurance reimbursement decisions. Cancer 2012;118:5163-70. (C) 2012 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:5163 / 5170
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gene expression profiling of calcifications in breast cancer
    Sung Ui Shin
    Jeonghoon Lee
    Ju Han Kim
    Won Hwa Kim
    Sung Eun Song
    Ajung Chu
    Hoe Suk Kim
    Wonshik Han
    Han Suk Ryu
    Woo Kyung Moon
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 7
  • [42] Gene expression profiling in male breast cancer
    Dubrovsky, Esther
    Raymond, Samantha
    Chun, Jennifer
    Schnabel, Freya
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)
  • [43] Gene expression profiling of calcifications in breast cancer
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Lee, Jeonghoon
    Kim, Ju Han
    Kim, Won Hwa
    Song, Sung Eun
    Chu, Ajung
    Kim, Hoe Suk
    Han, Wonshik
    Ryu, Han Suk
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [44] Gene expression profiling for prognosis of breast cancer
    van de Vijver, M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (01)
  • [45] Gene expression profiling: Decoding breast cancer
    de Snoo, Femke
    Bender, Richard
    Glas, Annuska
    Rutgers, Emiel
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2009, 18 (04): : 366 - 378
  • [46] Gene expression profiling of primary breast cancer
    Rouzier R.
    Wagner P.
    Morandi P.
    Pusztai L.
    [J]. Current Oncology Reports, 2005, 7 (1) : 38 - 44
  • [47] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prognostic Gene Expression Signature-Based Stratification of Early Breast Cancer Patients
    Blank, Patricia R.
    Filipits, Martin
    Dubsky, Peter
    Gutzwiller, Florian
    Lux, Michael P.
    Brase, Jan C.
    Weber, Karsten E.
    Rudas, Margaretha
    Greil, Richard
    Loibl, Sibylle
    Szucs, Thomas D.
    Kronenwett, Ralf
    Schwenkglenks, Matthias
    Gnant, Michael
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2015, 33 (02) : 179 - 190
  • [48] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prognostic Gene Expression Signature-Based Stratification of Early Breast Cancer Patients
    Patricia R. Blank
    Martin Filipits
    Peter Dubsky
    Florian Gutzwiller
    Michael P. Lux
    Jan C. Brase
    Karsten E. Weber
    Margaretha Rudas
    Richard Greil
    Sibylle Loibl
    Thomas D. Szucs
    Ralf Kronenwett
    Matthias Schwenkglenks
    Michael Gnant
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2015, 33 : 179 - 190
  • [49] Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer
    Maryann Kwa
    Andreas Makris
    Francisco J. Esteva
    [J]. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2017, 14 : 595 - 610
  • [50] Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer
    Kwa, Maryann
    Makris, Andreas
    Esteva, Francisco J.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 14 (10) : 595 - 610