On the verification of the incident energy fluence in tomotherapy IMRT

被引:24
|
作者
Kapatoes, JM
Olivera, GH
Ruchala, KJ
Mackie, TR
机构
[1] TomoTherapy Inc, Middleton, WI 53562 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Human Oncol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2001年 / 46卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/46/11/313
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
For any radiotherapy verification technique, it is desirable that issues with the accelerator, multileaf collimator and patient position be detected. In previous works, an effective method for this level of verification was presented. This paper identifies second-order issues affecting the part of the process in which the incident energy fluence is verified. These problems will affect any rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivery that divides each rotation or arc into projections; however the solutions offered in this paper are specific to the method previously developed. The issues affecting the energy fluence verification method include leaf bouncing, delivery implementation and leaf latency. All three matters were found to introduce small errors in the verified energy fluence values for a small fraction of leaf states. The overall effect on the deposited dose over the course of a rotational delivery involving thousands of beam pulses per rotation is negligible. Regardless, effective correction strategies are presented; these are utilized in order to characterize both the delivered energy fluence and deposited dose as accurately as possible.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2953 / 2965
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In Vivo Dose Delivery Verification of Gynecological Cancer IMRT Treatments using TomoTherapy's Exit Detector Data
    Goddu, S.
    Rodriguez, V. L.
    Richardson, S.
    Wooten, H.
    Schwarz, J. K.
    Grigsby, P. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S815 - S816
  • [22] GEOS/IMRT versus tomotherapy: A comparative study
    Van Esch, A.
    Huyskens, D.
    Bontemps, S.
    Devillers, M.
    Salamon, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S28 - S28
  • [23] Verification of tomotherapy dose delivery
    Pelagade, S. M.
    Paliwal, B. R.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 34 (03) : 188 - 190
  • [24] Daily dosimetric verification of delivered IMRT fluence profiles by portal imaging, taking into account changes in patient anatomy
    Dirkx, MLP
    de Boer, JCJ
    Vieira, SC
    Heijmen, BJM
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S21 - S22
  • [25] Multicenter Intercomparison for Treatment of the Mesothelioma with IMRT and Tomotherapy
    Guidi, G.
    Amadori, M.
    Antognoni, P.
    Tonoli, S.
    Spiazzi, L.
    Ghedi, B.
    Buonamici, F. Banci
    Schwarz, M.
    Danielli, C.
    Amichetti, M.
    Biti, G. P.
    Magrini, S. M.
    Bertoni, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [26] IMRT - Tomotherapy vs conventional linear accelerator
    Ku, P.
    Pino-y-Torres, J.
    Chang, S.
    Hsieh, H.
    McKeague, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2460 - 2460
  • [27] Helical tomotherapy: Image-guided IMRT
    Mackie, TR
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1323 - 1324
  • [28] GEOS/IMRT versus tomotherapy: A comparative study
    Van Esch, A.
    Huyskens, D. P.
    Bontemps, S.
    Devillers, M.
    Salamon, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S670 - S671
  • [29] Tomotherapy and other innovative IMRT delivery systems
    Fenwick, John D.
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    Soisson, Emilie T.
    Mehta, Minesh P.
    Mackie, T. Rock
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) : 199 - 208
  • [30] Validation of a new serial tomotherapy IMRT system
    Pavord, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2503 - 2503