Technological advances in suspended-sediment surrogate monitoring

被引:108
|
作者
Gray, John R. [1 ]
Gartner, Jeffrey W. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Off Surface Water, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
关键词
DOPPLER-CURRENT-PROFILER; OPTICAL BACKSCATTERANCE SENSOR; ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER; PARTICLE-SIZE; ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE; LABORATORY EVALUATION; SAND; ENVIRONMENT; INSTRUMENT; SUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1029/2008WR007063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Surrogate technologies to continuously monitor suspended sediment show promise toward supplanting traditional data collection methods requiring routine collection and analysis of water samples. Commercially available instruments operating on bulk optic (turbidity), laser optic, pressure difference, and acoustic backscatter principles are evaluated based on cost, reliability, robustness, accuracy, sample volume, susceptibility to biological fouling, and suitable range of mass concentration and particle size distribution. In situ turbidimeters are widely used. They provide reliable data where the point measurements can be reliably correlated to the river's mean cross section concentration value, effects of biological fouling can be minimized, and concentrations remain below the sensor's upper measurement limit. In situ laser diffraction instruments have similar limitations and can cost 6 times the approximate $5000 purchase price of a turbidimeter. However, laser diffraction instruments provide volumetric-concentration data in 32 size classes. Pressure differential instruments measure mass density in a water column, thus integrating substantially more streamflow than a point measurement. They are designed for monitoring medium-to-large concentrations, are generally unaffected by biological fouling, and cost about the same as a turbidimeter. However, their performance has been marginal in field applications. Acoustic Doppler profilers use acoustic backscatter to measure suspended sediment concentrations in orders of magnitude more streamflow than do instruments that rely on point measurements. The technology is relatively robust and generally immune to effects of biological fouling. Cost of a single-frequency device is about double that of a turbidimeter. Multifrequency arrays also provide the potential to resolve concentrations by clay silt versus sand size fractions. Multifrequency hydroacoustics shows the most promise for revolutionizing collection of continuous suspended sediment data by instruments that require only periodic calibration for correlation to mean concentrations in river cross sections. Broad application of proven suspended sediment surrogate technologies has the potential to revolutionize fluvial sediment monitoring. Once applied, benefits could be enormous, providing for safer, more frequent and consistent, arguably more accurate, and ultimately less expensive sediment data for managing the world's sedimentary resources.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Seasonal variations in suspended-sediment dynamics in the tidal reach of an estuarine tributary
    Downing-Kunz, Maureen A.
    Schoellhamer, David H.
    MARINE GEOLOGY, 2013, 345 : 314 - 326
  • [42] Numerical model of unsteady flow and suspended-sediment transport in river networks
    Zhu, YL
    PROCEEDINGS OF JOHN F KENNEDY STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION: 21ST CENTURY: THE NEW ERA FOR HYDRAULIC RESEARCH AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2001, : 193 - 200
  • [43] Quantification of the Escalating Influence of Anthropogenic Factors in Suspended-Sediment Concentration Regimes
    Shindekar, Mayur
    Dhanya, C. T.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2024, 29 (05)
  • [44] Suspended-Sediment Impacts on Light-Limited Productivity in the Delaware Estuary
    McSweeney, Jacqueline M.
    Chant, Robert J.
    Wilkin, John L.
    Sommerfield, Christopher K.
    ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2017, 40 (04) : 977 - 993
  • [45] Evaluation of Sediment - Surrogate Technologies for Computation of Suspended - Sediment Transport
    Gray, John R.
    Patino, Eduardo
    Rasmussen, Patrick P.
    Larsen, Matthew C.
    Melis, Theodore S.
    Topping, David J.
    Runner, Michael S.
    Alamo, Carlos Figueroa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL YELLOW RIVER FORUM ON RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, VOL III, 2003, : 314 - 323
  • [46] Seasonal variation of suspended-sediment transport through the southern Bohai Strait
    Bi, Naishuang
    Yang, Zuosheng
    Wang, Houjie
    Fan, Dejiang
    Sun, Xiaoxia
    Lei, Kun
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2011, 93 (03) : 239 - 247
  • [47] Suspended-sediment dynamics in the tidal reach of a San Francisco Bay tributary
    Gregory G. Shellenbarger
    Maureen A. Downing-Kunz
    David H. Schoellhamer
    Ocean Dynamics, 2015, 65 : 1477 - 1488
  • [48] SUSPENDED-SEDIMENT EXCHANGES BETWEEN THE ST LAWRENCE ESTUARY AND A COASTAL EMBAYMENT
    DANGLEJAN, B
    INGRAM, RG
    SAVARD, JP
    MARINE GEOLOGY, 1981, 40 (1-2) : 85 - 100
  • [49] RIVER-DOMINATED SUSPENDED-SEDIMENT DEPOSITION IN A NEW MISSISSIPPI DELTA
    VANHEERDEN, IL
    WELLS, JT
    ROBERTS, HH
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1983, 40 : 60 - 71
  • [50] Laboratory study of suspended-sediment transport in ice-cover flow
    Braileanu, F
    Ettema, R
    Muste, M
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND COASTAL HYDRAULICS: PROTECTING THE AQUATIC HABITAT, PROCEEDINGS OF THEME B, VOLS 1 & 2, 1997, 27 : 1239 - 1244