Technological advances in suspended-sediment surrogate monitoring

被引:108
|
作者
Gray, John R. [1 ]
Gartner, Jeffrey W. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Off Surface Water, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
关键词
DOPPLER-CURRENT-PROFILER; OPTICAL BACKSCATTERANCE SENSOR; ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER; PARTICLE-SIZE; ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE; LABORATORY EVALUATION; SAND; ENVIRONMENT; INSTRUMENT; SUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1029/2008WR007063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Surrogate technologies to continuously monitor suspended sediment show promise toward supplanting traditional data collection methods requiring routine collection and analysis of water samples. Commercially available instruments operating on bulk optic (turbidity), laser optic, pressure difference, and acoustic backscatter principles are evaluated based on cost, reliability, robustness, accuracy, sample volume, susceptibility to biological fouling, and suitable range of mass concentration and particle size distribution. In situ turbidimeters are widely used. They provide reliable data where the point measurements can be reliably correlated to the river's mean cross section concentration value, effects of biological fouling can be minimized, and concentrations remain below the sensor's upper measurement limit. In situ laser diffraction instruments have similar limitations and can cost 6 times the approximate $5000 purchase price of a turbidimeter. However, laser diffraction instruments provide volumetric-concentration data in 32 size classes. Pressure differential instruments measure mass density in a water column, thus integrating substantially more streamflow than a point measurement. They are designed for monitoring medium-to-large concentrations, are generally unaffected by biological fouling, and cost about the same as a turbidimeter. However, their performance has been marginal in field applications. Acoustic Doppler profilers use acoustic backscatter to measure suspended sediment concentrations in orders of magnitude more streamflow than do instruments that rely on point measurements. The technology is relatively robust and generally immune to effects of biological fouling. Cost of a single-frequency device is about double that of a turbidimeter. Multifrequency arrays also provide the potential to resolve concentrations by clay silt versus sand size fractions. Multifrequency hydroacoustics shows the most promise for revolutionizing collection of continuous suspended sediment data by instruments that require only periodic calibration for correlation to mean concentrations in river cross sections. Broad application of proven suspended sediment surrogate technologies has the potential to revolutionize fluvial sediment monitoring. Once applied, benefits could be enormous, providing for safer, more frequent and consistent, arguably more accurate, and ultimately less expensive sediment data for managing the world's sedimentary resources.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Suspended-Sediment Trapping in the Tidal Reach of an Estuarine Tributary Channel
    Maureen A. Downing-Kunz
    David H. Schoellhamer
    Estuaries and Coasts, 2015, 38 : 2198 - 2212
  • [33] Suspended-sediment responses after strip thinning in headwater catchments
    Sooyoun Nam
    Marino Hiraoka
    Takashi Gomi
    Bui Xuan Dung
    Yuichi Onda
    Hiroaki Kato
    Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2016, 12 : 197 - 208
  • [34] Suspended-Sediment Trapping in the Tidal Reach of an Estuarine Tributary Channel
    Downing-Kunz, Maureen A.
    Schoellhamer, David H.
    ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2015, 38 (06) : 2198 - 2212
  • [35] Sources of bias errors in flume experiments on suspended-sediment transport
    Muste, M
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (06) : 695 - 708
  • [36] A two-dimensional mathematical model of suspended-sediment transport
    Krzyk, M
    Cetina, M
    STROJNISKI VESTNIK-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 49 (03): : 173 - 184
  • [37] Suspended-sediment transport in an intensively cultivated watershed in southeastern California
    Gao, Peng
    Pasternack, Gregory B.
    Bali, Khaled M.
    Wallender, Wesley W.
    CATENA, 2007, 69 (03) : 239 - 252
  • [38] Suspended-sediment dynamics in the tidal reach of a San Francisco Bay tributary
    Shellenbarger, Gregory G.
    Downing-Kunz, Maureen A.
    Schoellhamer, David H.
    OCEAN DYNAMICS, 2015, 65 (11) : 1477 - 1488
  • [39] A two-phase numerical model for suspended-sediment transport in estuaries
    Nguyen, Kim Dan
    Guillou, Sylvain
    Chauchat, Julien
    Barbry, Nathaly
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2009, 32 (08) : 1187 - 1196
  • [40] Monthly suspended-sediment apportionment for a western Lake Erie agricultural tributary
    Williamson, Tanja N.
    Dobrowolski, Edward G.
    Gellis, Allen C.
    Sabitov, Timur
    Sanisaca, Lillian Gorman
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (05) : 1307 - 1320