Current antenatal management of monoamniotic twins: a survey of maternal-fetal medicine specialists

被引:11
|
作者
Desai, Neeraj [1 ]
Lewis, Dawnette [1 ]
Sunday, Suzanne [2 ]
Rochelson, Burton [1 ]
机构
[1] Hofstra N Shore LIJ, Hofstra N Shore LIJ Sch Med, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[2] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Biostat Unit, Manhasset, NY USA
来源
关键词
Clinical obstetrics; multiple gestation; monochorionic monoamniotic twin; IMPROVED PERINATAL SURVIVAL; CORD ENTANGLEMENT; CASE SERIES; DIAGNOSIS; INPATIENT;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2012.668979
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess current management of monoamniotic (MA) twins by US maternal-fetal medicine providers. Methods: We conducted a mailed survey to members of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine regarding fetal surveillance practices and preferred gestational age (GA) for elective delivery with respect to MA twins. Results: Responses from 837 (43%) were received with most (83.9%) recommending elective admission for inpatient monitoring, 53.5% favoring 26-28 weeks as earliest GA for admission and 75% performing intermittent fetal monitoring (of these 81% monitored 2-3 times/day). Respondents in practice less than 10 years were less likely to use outpatient management (p < 0.05). Median GA for elective delivery was 34 weeks but was higher for those who favored outpatient management, admitted >28 weeks, and were private practitioners (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Despite a paucity of evidence, most practitioners admit MA to perform daily intermittent fetal monitoring and deliver at 34 weeks. Antenatal management protocols may also influence timing of delivery. Due to their rarity, a national registry may be a better tool to analyze the outcomes of these pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:1913 / 1916
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relocations of Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialists in the United States, 2007-2016
    Rayburn, William
    Xierali, Imam M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S551 - S551
  • [32] Creating a Telemedicine Network of Specialists in Maternal-Fetal Medicine: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Oelmeier, Kathrin
    Schmitz, Ralf
    Moellers, Mareike
    Willy, Daniela
    Sourouni, Marina
    Sondern, Kathleen
    Koester, Helen Ann
    Apsite, Gunita
    Eveslage, Maria
    Fischhuber, Karen
    Storck, Michael
    Wohlmann, Jan
    Juhra, Christian
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2023, 29 (11) : 1723 - 1729
  • [33] Management of diabetic women with threatened preterm birth: a survey of Maternal-Fetal Medicine providers
    Battarbee, Ashley N.
    Aliaga, Sofia
    Boggess, Kim A.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (17): : 2941 - 2949
  • [34] Elective primary cesarean delivery: Attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists
    Wu, JM
    Hundley, MF
    Visco, AG
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (02): : 301 - 306
  • [35] Cesarean or vaginal delivery for the breech fetus at the threshold of viability: results from a maternal-fetal medicine specialists survey
    Deutsch, Aaron B.
    Duncan, Karen
    Rajaram, Lakshminarayan
    Salihu, Hamisu M.
    Spellacy, William N.
    Belogolovkin, Victoria
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (03): : 475 - 479
  • [36] Cesarean or vaginal delivery for the breech fetus at the threshold of viability: results from a maternal-fetal medicine specialists survey
    Deutsch, Aaron
    Duncan, Karen
    Rajaram, Lakshminarayan
    Salihu, Hamisu
    Spellacy, William
    Belogolovkin, Victoria
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S169 - S170
  • [37] THE FUTURE OF MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (06): : 1349 - 1351
  • [38] Maternal-fetal medicine introduction
    Smith, James F.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 21 (02)
  • [39] Maternal-Fetal Medicine in China
    Zheng, Thomas Q.
    Yang, Hui-Xia
    MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE, 2020, 2 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [40] Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    Johnson, Donna D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : 5A - 6A