Current antenatal management of monoamniotic twins: a survey of maternal-fetal medicine specialists

被引:11
|
作者
Desai, Neeraj [1 ]
Lewis, Dawnette [1 ]
Sunday, Suzanne [2 ]
Rochelson, Burton [1 ]
机构
[1] Hofstra N Shore LIJ, Hofstra N Shore LIJ Sch Med, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[2] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Biostat Unit, Manhasset, NY USA
来源
关键词
Clinical obstetrics; multiple gestation; monochorionic monoamniotic twin; IMPROVED PERINATAL SURVIVAL; CORD ENTANGLEMENT; CASE SERIES; DIAGNOSIS; INPATIENT;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2012.668979
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess current management of monoamniotic (MA) twins by US maternal-fetal medicine providers. Methods: We conducted a mailed survey to members of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine regarding fetal surveillance practices and preferred gestational age (GA) for elective delivery with respect to MA twins. Results: Responses from 837 (43%) were received with most (83.9%) recommending elective admission for inpatient monitoring, 53.5% favoring 26-28 weeks as earliest GA for admission and 75% performing intermittent fetal monitoring (of these 81% monitored 2-3 times/day). Respondents in practice less than 10 years were less likely to use outpatient management (p < 0.05). Median GA for elective delivery was 34 weeks but was higher for those who favored outpatient management, admitted >28 weeks, and were private practitioners (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Despite a paucity of evidence, most practitioners admit MA to perform daily intermittent fetal monitoring and deliver at 34 weeks. Antenatal management protocols may also influence timing of delivery. Due to their rarity, a national registry may be a better tool to analyze the outcomes of these pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:1913 / 1916
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE
    SCIOSCIA, AL
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 7 (02) : 83 - 84
  • [22] Maternal-fetal medicine
    Arulkumaran, S
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) : 103 - 103
  • [23] Maternal-fetal medicine specialists' provision of second-trimester termination
    Kerns, Jennifer
    Steinauer, Jody
    Rosenstein, Melissa
    Turk, Jema
    Caughey, Aaron
    D'Alton, Mary
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S67 - S67
  • [24] Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist survey on abortion training and service provision
    Lappen, Justin R.
    Vricella, Laura K.
    Andrews, Virginia
    Christensen, Erika
    Heuser, Cara C.
    Horvath, Sarah
    Johnson, Clark T.
    Louis, Judette M.
    Luchowski, Alicia T.
    Norton, Mary E.
    Sagaser, Katelynn G.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Werner, Erika
    Zahedi-Spung, Leilah
    Blackwell, Sean
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 225 (01) : B2 - B11
  • [25] Maternal-fetal medicine
    Vintzileos, AM
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 8 (02) : 87 - 88
  • [26] Defining the relationship between obstetricians and maternal-fetal medicine specialists - Reply
    Vintzileos, AM
    Smulian, JC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (01) : 257 - 258
  • [27] Maternal-fetal medicine
    Vintzileos, AM
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 9 (02) : 77 - 78
  • [28] Monoamniotic twins: What should be the optimal antenatal management?
    Sau, AK
    Langford, K
    Elliott, C
    Su, LL
    Maxwell, DJ
    TWIN RESEARCH, 2003, 6 (04): : 270 - 274
  • [29] Monoamniotic twins: Case series and proposal for antenatal management
    Beasley, E
    Megerian, G
    Gerson, A
    Roberts, NS
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (01): : 130 - 134
  • [30] Antenatal depression and maternal-fetal attachment
    Honjo, S
    Arai, S
    Kaneko, H
    Ujiie, T
    Murase, S
    Sechiyama, H
    Sasaki, Y
    Hatagaki, C
    Inagaki, E
    Usui, M
    Miwa, K
    Ishihara, M
    Hashimoto, O
    Nomura, K
    Itakura, A
    Inoko, K
    PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 36 (06) : 304 - 311