Clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy

被引:10
|
作者
Drouin, Sarah J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Comperat, Eva [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cussenot, Olivier [3 ,4 ]
Bitker, Marc-Olivier [1 ]
Haertig, Alain [1 ]
Roupret, Morgan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] GHU EST, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Urol, Paris, France
[2] GHU EST, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Pathol, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 06, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Etud & Rech Pathol Prostat, CeRePP, Paris, France
关键词
Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; Radical prostatectomy; Prostate-specific antigen; Biochemical recurrence; Prognosis; CANCER; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY; MEN; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; CANDIDATES; SURVIVAL; CRITERIA; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.04.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: We collected data from 495 patients who underwent RP during an 8-year period. We have then selected those who would have been eligible for AS according to 2 different sets of published criteria. Group I. used broader criteria: clinical stage <= T2b, Gleason score of seven or less and PSA <= 15 ng/ml. Group 2 used more restrictive criteria: age < 75 years, PSA < 10 ng/ml, clinical stage T1c or T2a, Gleason score of 6 or less, at least 10 biopsies available and a tumor length of less than 3 mm in 2 biopsy cores. Results: Overall, 207 patients (41.8%) were included in group 1 and 43 (8.7%) in group 2. The median follow-up was 31(3-108) and 32 (3-84) months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. We recorded 132 cases (63.8%) of pT2c in group 1 and 31 in group 2 (72.1%). Extracapsular extension was noted in 37 (17.9%) and 2 (4.7%) specimens from groups 1 and 2, respectively. In groups 1 and 2, a biochemical failure occurred in 47 patients (22.7%) and 6 (14%), respectively. The Gleason score at biopsy was underestimated in 54 (26%) and 9 (21%) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, 21% to 26% of patients eligible for AS had upgraded Gleason scores at prostatectomy and actually had a more significant disease with a potentially aggressive behavior. Therefore, based on criteria, certain tumors currently selected for AS may be significant and may require radical treatment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 407
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlation between clinical and pathological parameters in patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy: implications on active surveillance as a form of initial management in Filipino patients
    Alpajaro, Sigfred Ian R.
    Flores, Fluorence
    Letran, Jason L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 15 - 16
  • [42] Re: Radical Prostatectomy Findings in Patients in Whom Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Fails
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (05): : 2099 - 2099
  • [43] Radical Prostatectomy Findings in Patients in Whom Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Fails REPLY
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (05): : 2279 - 2279
  • [44] Re: Radical Prostatectomy Findings in Patients in Whom Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Fails
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) : 540 - 541
  • [45] Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy in patients initially managed by active surveillance: A comparative analysis
    Iremashvili, Viacheslav
    Manoharan, Murugesan
    Rosenberg, Daniel L.
    Acosta, Kristell
    Soloway, Mark S.
    PROSTATE, 2012, 72 (14): : 1573 - 1579
  • [46] Radical Prostatectomy Findings in Patients in Whom Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Fails COMMENT
    Catalona, William J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (05): : 2278 - 2279
  • [47] PATHOLOGIC UPGRADING IN PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IN A VETERANS AFFAIRS POPULATION
    Lee, Eugene
    Baack, Janet
    Thrasher, J. Brantley
    Holzbeierlein, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E674 - E674
  • [48] POST RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WHO WERE CANDIDATES FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Gomez Veiga, F.
    Breijo, S. M.
    Pertega, S.
    Ponce, J.
    Dacal, J.
    Zarraonaindia, A.
    Casas, J.
    Lopez, D.
    Pita, S.
    Abal, V. C. H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 332 - 332
  • [49] Significance of Surgical Margin in Patients with Clinical Localized Prostate Carcinoma Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
    Huri, E.
    Aydogmus, Y.
    Dadali, M.
    Aydin, A.
    Demirbas, A.
    Emir, L.
    Germiyanoglu, C.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S287 - S288
  • [50] BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS SUITABLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE WHO WERE TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Briganti, Alberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Bianchi, Marco
    Tutolo, Manuela
    Salonia, Andrea
    Tutolo, Manuela
    Bertini, Roberto
    Colombo, Renzo
    Freschi, Massimo
    Doglioni, Claudio
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (04) : 1458 - 1459