Clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy

被引:10
|
作者
Drouin, Sarah J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Comperat, Eva [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cussenot, Olivier [3 ,4 ]
Bitker, Marc-Olivier [1 ]
Haertig, Alain [1 ]
Roupret, Morgan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] GHU EST, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Urol, Paris, France
[2] GHU EST, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Pathol, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 06, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Etud & Rech Pathol Prostat, CeRePP, Paris, France
关键词
Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; Radical prostatectomy; Prostate-specific antigen; Biochemical recurrence; Prognosis; CANCER; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY; MEN; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; CANDIDATES; SURVIVAL; CRITERIA; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.04.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: We collected data from 495 patients who underwent RP during an 8-year period. We have then selected those who would have been eligible for AS according to 2 different sets of published criteria. Group I. used broader criteria: clinical stage <= T2b, Gleason score of seven or less and PSA <= 15 ng/ml. Group 2 used more restrictive criteria: age < 75 years, PSA < 10 ng/ml, clinical stage T1c or T2a, Gleason score of 6 or less, at least 10 biopsies available and a tumor length of less than 3 mm in 2 biopsy cores. Results: Overall, 207 patients (41.8%) were included in group 1 and 43 (8.7%) in group 2. The median follow-up was 31(3-108) and 32 (3-84) months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. We recorded 132 cases (63.8%) of pT2c in group 1 and 31 in group 2 (72.1%). Extracapsular extension was noted in 37 (17.9%) and 2 (4.7%) specimens from groups 1 and 2, respectively. In groups 1 and 2, a biochemical failure occurred in 47 patients (22.7%) and 6 (14%), respectively. The Gleason score at biopsy was underestimated in 54 (26%) and 9 (21%) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, 21% to 26% of patients eligible for AS had upgraded Gleason scores at prostatectomy and actually had a more significant disease with a potentially aggressive behavior. Therefore, based on criteria, certain tumors currently selected for AS may be significant and may require radical treatment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 407
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF FREQUENTLY USED ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE CRITERIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON BASIS OF THE PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS FROM THE PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS
    Kavran, Andre
    Kunz, Inga
    Roggenbuck, Ulla
    Vanberg, Michaela
    Klevecka, Virgilijus
    Musch, Michael
    Kroepfl, Darko
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E225 - E225
  • [22] PREDICTORS OF PATHOLOGICAL UPGRADING AND UPSTAGING IN PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE SUBMITTED TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Autran-Gomez, Ana Maria
    Secin, Fernando P.
    Sivaraman, Arjun
    Salas, Rafael Sanchez
    Monzo, Juan I.
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Barret, Eric
    Rozet, Francois
    Galiano, Marc
    Mombet, Annick
    Cathala, Nathalia
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E515 - E516
  • [23] Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance
    Marc Zanaty
    Khaled Ajib
    Kevin Zorn
    Assaad El-Hakim
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 1391 - 1397
  • [24] Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance
    Zanaty, Marc
    Ajib, Khaled
    Zorn, Kevin
    El-Hakim, Assaad
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 1391 - 1397
  • [25] Association of transcriptomic biomarkers with adverse pathologic features at radical prostatectomy among active surveillance eligible men.
    Li, Eric
    Proudfoot, James A.
    Kundu, Nalin
    Ho, Austin Y.
    Neill, Clayton
    Davicioni, Elai
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Ross, Ashley
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (4_SUPPL) : 338 - 338
  • [26] Radical prostatectomy findings in patients considered potential candidates for active surveillance
    Troncoso, P.
    Davis, J. W.
    Ward, J. F.
    Wang, X.
    Babaian, R. J.
    Kim, J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2008, 88 : 185A - 185A
  • [27] PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE WHO CHOSE TO UNDERGO PROSTATECTOMY: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROSTATE CANCER FEATURES ON BIOPSY AND FINAL PATHOLOGIC REPORT
    Katz, Benjamin
    Yu, Sue-Jean
    Llukani, Elton
    Lightfoot, Andrew
    Monahan, Kelly
    McGill, Alice
    Lee, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E516 - E516
  • [28] Pathologic Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Mufarrij, Patrick
    Sankin, Alex
    Godoy, Guilherme
    Lepor, Herbert
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (03) : 689 - 692
  • [29] Pathology findings after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in patients eligible for active surveillance: Contribution of multiparametric MRI to treatment decision
    Martin-Malburet, A.
    Marcq, G.
    Leroy, X.
    Guiffart, P.
    Fantoni, J. -C.
    Flannand, V.
    Villers, A.
    Puech, P.
    Ouzzane, A.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2018, 28 (8-9): : 425 - 433
  • [30] CHARACTERISTICS OF LONG-TERM BIOCHEMICAL RELAPSE IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PATHOLOGIC STAGE T2
    Cini, Chiara
    Masieri, Lorenzo
    Lanciotti, Michele
    Giancane, Saverio
    Salvi, Matteo
    Lapini, Alberto
    Semi, Sergio
    Carini, Marco
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (05) : 2673 - 2673