Clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy

被引:10
|
作者
Drouin, Sarah J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Comperat, Eva [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cussenot, Olivier [3 ,4 ]
Bitker, Marc-Olivier [1 ]
Haertig, Alain [1 ]
Roupret, Morgan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] GHU EST, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Urol, Paris, France
[2] GHU EST, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Pathol, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 06, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Etud & Rech Pathol Prostat, CeRePP, Paris, France
关键词
Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; Radical prostatectomy; Prostate-specific antigen; Biochemical recurrence; Prognosis; CANCER; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY; MEN; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; CANDIDATES; SURVIVAL; CRITERIA; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.04.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: We collected data from 495 patients who underwent RP during an 8-year period. We have then selected those who would have been eligible for AS according to 2 different sets of published criteria. Group I. used broader criteria: clinical stage <= T2b, Gleason score of seven or less and PSA <= 15 ng/ml. Group 2 used more restrictive criteria: age < 75 years, PSA < 10 ng/ml, clinical stage T1c or T2a, Gleason score of 6 or less, at least 10 biopsies available and a tumor length of less than 3 mm in 2 biopsy cores. Results: Overall, 207 patients (41.8%) were included in group 1 and 43 (8.7%) in group 2. The median follow-up was 31(3-108) and 32 (3-84) months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. We recorded 132 cases (63.8%) of pT2c in group 1 and 31 in group 2 (72.1%). Extracapsular extension was noted in 37 (17.9%) and 2 (4.7%) specimens from groups 1 and 2, respectively. In groups 1 and 2, a biochemical failure occurred in 47 patients (22.7%) and 6 (14%), respectively. The Gleason score at biopsy was underestimated in 54 (26%) and 9 (21%) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, 21% to 26% of patients eligible for AS had upgraded Gleason scores at prostatectomy and actually had a more significant disease with a potentially aggressive behavior. Therefore, based on criteria, certain tumors currently selected for AS may be significant and may require radical treatment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 407
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oncological Outcomes in Patients Potentially Eligible for Active Surveillance who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
    Blazquez, C.
    Hernandez, V.
    de la Pena, E.
    Diaz, F. J.
    Martin, M. D.
    de la Morena, J. M.
    Llorente, C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2013, 37 (10): : 603 - 607
  • [2] PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OF MEN ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: IMPACT OF RACE
    DeLay, Kenneth
    Williams, Michael
    Given, Robert
    Lance, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E515 - E515
  • [3] Pathologic findings in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following active surveillance: a prospective study in a single center
    Ha, Y. -S.
    Yu, J.
    Patel, N.
    Salmasi, A. Hassanzadeh
    Parihar, J.
    Kwon, T. G.
    Kim, W. -J.
    Kim, I. Y.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2015, 67 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [4] Pathologic findings in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following active surveillance: a prospective study in a single center
    Yu, Jihyeong
    Ha, Y. S.
    Patel, N.
    Salmasi, A. Hassanzadeh
    Parihar, J.
    Kwon, T. G.
    Kim, W. J.
    Kim, I. Y.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 11 - 12
  • [5] Predictive factors of unfavorable prostate cancer in patients who underwent prostatectomy but eligible for active surveillance
    Choo, Seol Ho
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2 (02) : 70 - 75
  • [6] Pathologic Findings in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens From Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance With Highly Selective Criteria: A Multicenter Study
    Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Soulie, Michel
    Pfister, Christian
    Van Agt, Simon
    Vincendeau, Sebastien
    Larue, Sebastien
    Rigaud, Jerome
    Gaschignard, Nicolas
    Roupret, Morgan
    Drouin, Sarah
    Peyromaure, Mickael
    Long, Jean Alexandre
    Iborra, Francois
    Vallancien, Guy
    Rozet, Francois
    Salomon, Laurent
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : 656 - 660
  • [7] PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OF PATIENT'S ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: STRATIFICATION BY SELECTION CRITERIA AND RACE
    DeLay, Kenneth
    Williams, Michael
    Beydoun, Hind
    Given, Robert
    Lance, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E603 - E603
  • [8] PATHOLOGIC STAGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CURE IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE PATIENTS WHO UNDERGO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Landis, Patricia
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E413 - E414
  • [9] Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS)
    Lellig, Ekaterina
    Gratzke, Christian
    Kretschmer, Alexander
    Stief, Christian
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (07) : 917 - 922
  • [10] Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS)
    Ekaterina Lellig
    Christian Gratzke
    Alexander Kretschmer
    Christian Stief
    World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 917 - 922