Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study

被引:31
|
作者
Jo, Si-Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Kyoung-Ii [1 ]
Seo, Jae-Min [1 ]
Song, Kwang-Yeob [1 ]
Park, Ju-Mi [1 ]
Ahn, Seung-Geun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Jeonju 561756, Chonbuk, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS | 2010年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
Impression coping; Implant angulation; Master cast accuracy;
D O I
10.4047/jap.2010.2.4.128
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the implant master cast according to the type (pick-up, transfer) and the length (long, short) of the impression copings. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The metal master cast was fabricated with three internal connection type implant analogs (Osstem GS III analog), embedded parallel and with 10 of mesial angulation to the center analog. Four types of impression coping were prepared with different combinations of types (transfer, pick-up) and lengths (long, short) of the coping. The impressions were made using vinyl polysiloxane (one step, heavy + light body) with an individual tray, and 10 impressions were made for each group. Eventually, 40 experimental casts were produced. Then, the difference in the distance between the master cast and the experimental cast were measured, and the error rate was determined. The analysis of variance was performed using the SPSS (v 12.0) program (alpha = .05), and the statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS. The ANOVA showed that the pick-up type impression coping exhibited a significantly lower error rate than the transfer type. However, no significant difference was observed with respect to the length of the impression coping. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the parallel and mesial angulated groups. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, the pick-up type impression coping exhibited a more accurate implant master cast than the transfer type in parallel group. The accuracy of the implant master cast did not differ for different lengths of impression coping of at least 11 mm. Additionally, the accuracy of the implant cast was not different for the parallel and 10 degrees mesial angulated groups. [J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:128-33]
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 133
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Arch Size and Implant Angulations on the Accuracy of Implant Impressions
    Rezaei, Susan Mirmohammad
    Geramipanah, Farideh
    Kamali, Hadi
    Sadighpour, Leyla
    Payaminia, Leila
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 29 (04): : 218 - 222
  • [22] Investigation of the effects of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression using two intraoral scanners: An in vitro study
    Geramipanah, Farideh
    Sadighpour, Leyla
    Payaminia, Leila
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 9 (06): : 983 - 992
  • [23] Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
    Farronato, Davide
    Pasini, Pietro Mario
    Campana, Veronica
    Lops, Diego
    Azzi, Lorenzo
    Manfredini, Mattia
    ODONTOLOGY, 2021, 109 (04) : 884 - 894
  • [24] Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
    Davide Farronato
    Pietro Mario Pasini
    Veronica Campana
    Diego Lops
    Lorenzo Azzi
    Mattia Manfredini
    Odontology, 2021, 109 : 884 - 894
  • [25] Effect of Implant Angulation and Depth on the Accuracy of Casts Using the Open Tray Splinted Impression Technique
    Taduri, Thanmai
    Mathur, Somil
    Upadhyay, Snehal
    Patel, Khushali
    Shah, Meena
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 47 (06) : 447 - 454
  • [26] Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: An in vitro study
    Sicilia, Elena
    Lagreca, Gabriela
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Cobo, Juan
    Att, Wael
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (06): : 1126 - 1134
  • [27] The effect of different implant impression splinting techniques and time on the dimensional accuracy: An in vitro study
    Rutkunas, V.
    Bilius, V.
    Simonaitis, T.
    Auskalnis, L.
    Jurgilevicius, J.
    Akulauskas, M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 126
  • [28] Influence of the implant scan body bevel location, implant angulation and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    Alvarez, Francisco
    Ortega, Rocio
    Gomez-Polo, Cristina
    Barmak, Abdul B.
    Kois, John C.
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 121
  • [29] Accuracy of multiple implant impressions using different combinations of impression materials using closed tray technique: An in vitro study
    Deshmukh, Madhura
    Ahmed, Nabeel
    Maiti, Subhabrata
    Rajaraman, Vaishnavi
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (06) : 412 - 415
  • [30] Accuracy of multiple implant impressions using different combinations of impression materials using closed tray technique: An in vitro study
    Deshmukh, Madhura
    Ahmed, Nabeel
    Maiti, Subhabrata
    Rajaraman, Vaishnavi
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH, 2022, 13 : S412 - S415