Compounding of Wealth in Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrencies

被引:36
|
作者
Fanti, Giulia [1 ]
Kogan, Leonid [2 ]
Oh, Sewoong [3 ]
Ruan, Kathleen [1 ]
Viswanath, Pramod [4 ]
Wang, Gerui [4 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
Proof-of-stake; Cryptocurrencies; Random processes;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-32101-7_3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Proof-of-stake (PoS) is a promising approach for designing efficient blockchains, where block proposers are randomly chosen with probability proportional to their stake. A primary concern in PoS systems is the "rich getting richer" effect, whereby wealthier nodes are more likely to get elected, and hence reap the block reward, making them even wealthier. In this paper, we introduce the notion of equitability, which quantifies how much a proposer can amplify her stake compared to her initial investment. Even with everyone following protocol (i.e., honest behavior), we show that existing methods of allocating block rewards lead to poor equitability, as does initializing systems with small stake pools and/or large rewards relative to the stake pool. We identify a geometric reward function, which we prove is maximally equitable over all choices of reward functions under honest behavior and bound the deviation for strategic actions; the proofs involve the study of optimization problems and stochastic dominances of Polya urn processes. These results allow us to provide a systematic framework to choose the parameters of a practical incentive system for PoS cryptocurrencies.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 61
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bulwark: A proof-of-stake protocol with strong consistency and liveness
    Du, Zhiqiang
    Liu, Liangxin
    Huang, Muhong
    Fu, Yanfang
    Zhang, Wendong
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2024, 242
  • [32] Proof-of-Participation: Implementation of Proof-of-Stake Through Proof-of-Work
    Nandwani, Arpit
    Gupta, Mudit
    Thakur, Narina
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, VOL 1, 2019, 55 : 17 - 24
  • [33] Private Proof-of-Stake Blockchains using Differentially-Private Stake Distortion
    Wang, Chenghong
    Pujol, David
    Nayak, Kartik
    Machanavajjhala, Ashwin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 32ND USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 1577 - 1594
  • [34] Sybil attacks on identity-augmented Proof-of-Stake
    Platt, Moritz
    McBurney, Peter
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2021, 199
  • [35] Extortion of a Staking Pool in a Proof-of-Stake Consensus Mechanism
    Bhudia, Alpesh
    Cartwright, Anna
    Cartwright, Edward
    Hernandez-Castro, Julio
    Hurley-Smith, Darren
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OMNI-LAYER INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IEEE COINS 2022), 2022, : 271 - 276
  • [36] PROOF-OF-STAKE CONSENSUS METHOD FOR UPCOMING BLOCKCHAIN NETWORKS
    Krishnan, Sridharan
    Koperundevi, ArjunVikram Thiruvengavaradan
    Jayasundarapandiyan, Bharathiraja
    Sampath, Jeevanraj
    SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04):
  • [37] Two More Attacks on Proof-of-Stake GHOST/Ethereum
    Neu, Joachim
    Tas, Ertem Nusret
    Tse, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 ACM WORKSHOP ON DEVELOPMENTS IN CONSENSUS, CONSENSUSDAY 2022, 2022, : 43 - 52
  • [38] Ouroboros Crypsinous: Privacy-Preserving Proof-of-Stake
    Kerber, Thomas
    Kiayias, Aggelos
    Kohlweiss, Markulf
    Zikas, Vassilis
    2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2019), 2019, : 157 - 174
  • [39] Looking for stability in proof-of-stake based consensus mechanisms
    Leporati, Alberto
    Rovida, Lorenzo
    Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2024, 5 (04):
  • [40] MISS-STAKE BY IRS: PROOF-OF-STAKE'S UNDERINCLUSIVE REGULATORY GUIDANCE
    Duncans, Jack H.
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2024, 97 (02) : 537 - 570