Compounding of Wealth in Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrencies

被引:36
|
作者
Fanti, Giulia [1 ]
Kogan, Leonid [2 ]
Oh, Sewoong [3 ]
Ruan, Kathleen [1 ]
Viswanath, Pramod [4 ]
Wang, Gerui [4 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
Proof-of-stake; Cryptocurrencies; Random processes;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-32101-7_3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Proof-of-stake (PoS) is a promising approach for designing efficient blockchains, where block proposers are randomly chosen with probability proportional to their stake. A primary concern in PoS systems is the "rich getting richer" effect, whereby wealthier nodes are more likely to get elected, and hence reap the block reward, making them even wealthier. In this paper, we introduce the notion of equitability, which quantifies how much a proposer can amplify her stake compared to her initial investment. Even with everyone following protocol (i.e., honest behavior), we show that existing methods of allocating block rewards lead to poor equitability, as does initializing systems with small stake pools and/or large rewards relative to the stake pool. We identify a geometric reward function, which we prove is maximally equitable over all choices of reward functions under honest behavior and bound the deviation for strategic actions; the proofs involve the study of optimization problems and stochastic dominances of Polya urn processes. These results allow us to provide a systematic framework to choose the parameters of a practical incentive system for PoS cryptocurrencies.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 61
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Game-Theoretic Randomness for Proof-of-Stake
    Cai, Zhuo
    Goharshady, Amir
    MATHEMATICAL RESEARCH FOR BLOCKCHAIN ECONOMY, MARBLE 2023, 2023, : 28 - 47
  • [22] TontineCoin: Survivor-based Proof-of-Stake
    Pollett, Chris
    Austin, Thomas H.
    Potika, Katerina
    Rietz, Justin
    Pardeshi, Prashant
    PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 15 (02) : 988 - 1007
  • [23] Liquid Proof-of-Stake in Tezos: An Economic Analysis
    Dimitri, Nicola
    INFORMATION, 2022, 13 (12)
  • [24] TontineCoin: Survivor-based Proof-of-Stake
    Chris Pollett
    Thomas H. Austin
    Katerina Potika
    Justin Rietz
    Prashant Pardeshi
    Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 2022, 15 : 988 - 1007
  • [25] Stakechain: A Bitcoin-Backed Proof-of-Stake
    Linus, Robin
    FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY. FC 2022 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPS, 2023, 13412 : 3 - 14
  • [26] Ouroboros: A Provably Secure Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol
    Kiayias, Aggelos
    Russell, Alexander
    David, Bernardo
    Oliynykov, Roman
    ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - CRYPTO 2017, PT I, 2017, 10401 : 357 - 388
  • [27] Design of Proof-of-Stake PBFT Algorithm for IoT Environments
    Misic, Jelena
    Misic, Vojislav B.
    Chang, Xiaolin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 72 (02) : 2497 - 2510
  • [28] Proof-of-Stake Protocols for Privacy-Aware Blockchains
    Ganesh, Chaya
    Orlandi, Claudio
    Tschudi, Daniel
    ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT 2019, PT I, 2019, 11476 : 690 - 719
  • [29] Obfuscating Verifiable Random Functions for Proof-of-Stake Blockchains
    Shi, Yang
    Luo, Tianyuan
    Liang, Jingwen
    Au, Man Ho
    Luo, Xiapu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2024, 21 (04) : 2982 - 2996
  • [30] Puncturable Signatures and Applications in Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocols
    Li, Xinyu
    Xu, Jing
    Fan, Xiong
    Wang, Yuchen
    Zhang, Zhenfeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, 2020, 15 : 3872 - 3885