Compounding of Wealth in Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrencies

被引:36
|
作者
Fanti, Giulia [1 ]
Kogan, Leonid [2 ]
Oh, Sewoong [3 ]
Ruan, Kathleen [1 ]
Viswanath, Pramod [4 ]
Wang, Gerui [4 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
Proof-of-stake; Cryptocurrencies; Random processes;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-32101-7_3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Proof-of-stake (PoS) is a promising approach for designing efficient blockchains, where block proposers are randomly chosen with probability proportional to their stake. A primary concern in PoS systems is the "rich getting richer" effect, whereby wealthier nodes are more likely to get elected, and hence reap the block reward, making them even wealthier. In this paper, we introduce the notion of equitability, which quantifies how much a proposer can amplify her stake compared to her initial investment. Even with everyone following protocol (i.e., honest behavior), we show that existing methods of allocating block rewards lead to poor equitability, as does initializing systems with small stake pools and/or large rewards relative to the stake pool. We identify a geometric reward function, which we prove is maximally equitable over all choices of reward functions under honest behavior and bound the deviation for strategic actions; the proofs involve the study of optimization problems and stochastic dominances of Polya urn processes. These results allow us to provide a systematic framework to choose the parameters of a practical incentive system for PoS cryptocurrencies.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 61
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel approach to alleviate wealth compounding in proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies
    Naderi, Zahra
    Shariatpanahi, Seyed Pooya
    Bahrak, Behnam
    PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 17 (03) : 1322 - 1334
  • [2] Incentive compatible and anti-compounding of wealth in proof-of-stake
    Wang, Yilei
    Yang, Guoyu
    Bracciali, Andrea
    Leung, Ho-fung
    Tian, Haibo
    Ke, Lishan
    Yu, Xiaomei
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 530 : 85 - 94
  • [3] Balancing Participation and Decentralization in Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrencies
    Kiayias, Aggelos
    Koutsoupias, Elias
    Marmolejo-Cossio, Francisco
    Stouka, Aikaterini-Panagiota
    ALGORITHMIC GAME THEORY, SAGT 2024, 2024, 15156 : 333 - 350
  • [4] Virtual ASICs: Generalized Proof-of-Stake Mining in Cryptocurrencies
    Ganesh, Chaya
    Orlandi, Claudio
    Tschudi, Daniel
    Zohar, Aviv
    DATA PRIVACY MANAGEMENT, CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY, ESORICS 2021, 2022, 13140 : 173 - 191
  • [5] Shorting attack: Predatory, destructive short selling on Proof-of-Stake cryptocurrencies
    Lee, Suhyeon
    Kim, Seungjoo
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2023, 35 (16):
  • [6] Proof-of-Stake Sidechains
    Gazi, Peter
    Kiayias, Aggelos
    Zindros, Dionysis
    2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2019), 2019, : 139 - 156
  • [7] Stake-Bleeding Attacks on Proof-of-Stake Blockchains
    Gazi, Peter
    Kiayias, Aggelos
    Russell, Alexander
    2018 CRYPTO VALLEY CONFERENCE ON BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY (CVCBT), 2018, : 85 - 92
  • [8] Evolution of Shares in a Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrency
    Rosu, Ioanid
    Saleh, Fahad
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (02) : 661 - 672
  • [9] LaKSA: A Probabilistic Proof-of-Stake Protocol
    Reijsbergen, Daniel
    Szalachowski, Pawel
    Ke, Junming
    Li, Zengpeng
    Zhou, Jianying
    28TH ANNUAL NETWORK AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM SECURITY SYMPOSIUM (NDSS 2021), 2021,
  • [10] Securing Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocols
    Li, Wenting
    Andreina, Sebastien
    Bohli, Jens-Matthias
    Karame, Ghassan
    DATA PRIVACY MANAGEMENT, CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 10436 : 297 - 315