Facts Up Front Versus Traffic Light Food Labels A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:99
|
作者
Roberto, Christina A. [1 ]
Bragg, Marie A. [1 ]
Schwartz, Marlene B. [1 ]
Seamans, Marissa J. [2 ]
Musicus, Aviva [1 ]
Novak, Nicole [1 ]
Brownell, Kelly D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Rudd Ctr Food Policy & Obes, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.022
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The U.S. food and beverage industry recently released a new front-of-package nutrition labeling system called Facts Up Front that will be used on thousands of food products. Purpose: To test consumer understanding of the Facts Up Front system (Facts Up Front) compared to the Multiple Traffic Light system (Traffic Light). Facts Up Front displays grams/milligrams and percentage daily value information for various nutrients; Traffic Light uses an interpretive color-coded scheme to alert consumers to low, medium, and high levels of certain nutrients. Design: Participants in an Internet-based study were randomized to one of five front-of-package label conditions: (1) no label; (2) Traffic Light; (3) Traffic Light plus information about protein and fiber (Traffic Light+); (4) Facts Up Front; or (5) Facts Up Front plus information about "nutrients to encourage" (Facts Up Front+). Setting/participants: A total of 703 adults recruited through an online database in May 2011 participated in this study, and data were analyzed in June 2011. Main outcome measures: Total percentage correct quiz scores were generated reflecting participants' ability to compare two foods on nutrient levels, based on their labels, and to estimate amounts of saturated fat, sugar, sodium, fiber and protein in the foods. Results: The front-of-package label groups outperformed the control group on nearly all of the nutrient quizzes (p < 0.05). The control group did not differ from the Facts Up Front group on the saturated fat quiz, or from the Facts Up Front+ group on the sugars quiz. Those in the Traffic Light+ group had the best overall performance (>80% on all quizzes). Conclusions: Overall, those in the Traffic Light+ condition performed better than those in the Facts Up Front conditions on measures of nutrition knowledge and label perceptions. Trial registration: This study is registered at clinicaltrials. gov NCT01626729. (Am J Prev Med 2012; 43(2): 134-141) (C) 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Traffic-light front-of-pack environmental labelling across food categories triggers more environmentally friendly food choices: a randomised controlled trial in virtual reality supermarket
    Arrazat, Laura
    Chambaron, Stephanie
    Arvisenet, Gaelle
    Goisbault, Isabelle
    Charrier, Jean-Christophe
    Nicklaus, Sophie
    Marty, Lucile
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [32] Traffic-light front-of-pack environmental labelling across food categories triggers more environmentally friendly food choices: a randomised controlled trial in virtual reality supermarket
    Laura Arrazat
    Stéphanie Chambaron
    Gaëlle Arvisenet
    Isabelle Goisbault
    Jean-Christophe Charrier
    Sophie Nicklaus
    Lucile Marty
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 20
  • [33] The Effect of Dynamic Food Labels with Real-Time Feedback on Diet Quality: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Shin, Soye
    van Dam, Rob M.
    Finkelstein, Eric A.
    NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (07) : 1 - 16
  • [34] The effect of energy and traffic light labelling on parent and child fast food selection: a randomised controlled trial
    Dodds, Pennie
    Wolfenden, Luke
    Chapman, Kathy
    Wellard, Lyndal
    Hughes, Clare
    Wiggers, John
    APPETITE, 2014, 73 : 23 - 30
  • [35] Competitive Effects of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Adoption on Nutritional Quality: Evidence from Facts Up Front-Style Labels
    Lim, Joon Ho
    Rishika, Rishika
    Janakiraman, Ramkumar
    Kannan, P. K.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2020, 84 (06) : 3 - 21
  • [36] Can traffic light food labels supersede dietary guidelines and reconcile gastronomy with health?
    Beard, T.
    Gray, W.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2010, 29 : 51 - 51
  • [37] Telemedicine versus face-to-face follow up in general surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Fink, Teagan
    Chen, Qianyu
    Chong, Lynn
    Hii, Michael W.
    Knowles, Brett
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (10) : 2544 - 2550
  • [38] Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase the use of traffic light food labelling in UK shoppers (the FLICC trial)
    Scarborough P.
    Hodgkins C.
    Raats M.M.
    Harrington R.A.
    Cowburn G.
    Dean M.
    Doherty A.
    Foster C.
    Juszczak E.
    Matthews A.
    Mizdrak A.
    Mhurchu C.N.
    Shepherd R.
    Tiomotijevic L.
    Winstone N.
    Rayner M.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 1 (1)
  • [39] A randomized controlled trial of stapled versus diathermy haemorrhoidectomy
    Cheetham, MJ
    Cohen, CRG
    Kamm, MA
    Phillips, RKS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 : 72 - 72
  • [40] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINI CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    BARKUN, JS
    BARKUN, AN
    SAMPALIS, JS
    FRIED, G
    TAYLOR, B
    WEXLER, MJ
    GORESKY, CA
    MEAKINS, JL
    LANCET, 1992, 340 (8828): : 1116 - 1119