Facts Up Front Versus Traffic Light Food Labels A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:99
|
作者
Roberto, Christina A. [1 ]
Bragg, Marie A. [1 ]
Schwartz, Marlene B. [1 ]
Seamans, Marissa J. [2 ]
Musicus, Aviva [1 ]
Novak, Nicole [1 ]
Brownell, Kelly D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Rudd Ctr Food Policy & Obes, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.022
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The U.S. food and beverage industry recently released a new front-of-package nutrition labeling system called Facts Up Front that will be used on thousands of food products. Purpose: To test consumer understanding of the Facts Up Front system (Facts Up Front) compared to the Multiple Traffic Light system (Traffic Light). Facts Up Front displays grams/milligrams and percentage daily value information for various nutrients; Traffic Light uses an interpretive color-coded scheme to alert consumers to low, medium, and high levels of certain nutrients. Design: Participants in an Internet-based study were randomized to one of five front-of-package label conditions: (1) no label; (2) Traffic Light; (3) Traffic Light plus information about protein and fiber (Traffic Light+); (4) Facts Up Front; or (5) Facts Up Front plus information about "nutrients to encourage" (Facts Up Front+). Setting/participants: A total of 703 adults recruited through an online database in May 2011 participated in this study, and data were analyzed in June 2011. Main outcome measures: Total percentage correct quiz scores were generated reflecting participants' ability to compare two foods on nutrient levels, based on their labels, and to estimate amounts of saturated fat, sugar, sodium, fiber and protein in the foods. Results: The front-of-package label groups outperformed the control group on nearly all of the nutrient quizzes (p < 0.05). The control group did not differ from the Facts Up Front group on the saturated fat quiz, or from the Facts Up Front+ group on the sugars quiz. Those in the Traffic Light+ group had the best overall performance (>80% on all quizzes). Conclusions: Overall, those in the Traffic Light+ condition performed better than those in the Facts Up Front conditions on measures of nutrition knowledge and label perceptions. Trial registration: This study is registered at clinicaltrials. gov NCT01626729. (Am J Prev Med 2012; 43(2): 134-141) (C) 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Polish Consumers' Understanding of Different Front-of-Package Food Labels: A Randomized Experiment
    Andreeva, Valentina A.
    Egnell, Manon
    Stos, Katarzyna
    Przygoda, Beata
    Talati, Zenobia
    Touvier, Mathilde
    Galan, Pilar
    Hercberg, Serge
    Pettigrew, Simone
    Julia, Chantal
    FOODS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [22] A randomized trial of a brief multimedia intervention to improve comprehension of food labels
    Jay, Melanie
    Adams, Jennifer
    Herring, Sharon J.
    Gillespie, Colleen
    Ark, Tavinder
    Feldman, Henry
    Jones, Vicky
    Zabar, Sondra
    Stevens, David
    Kalet, Adina
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 48 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [23] Traffic-Light Labels and Choice Architecture Promoting Healthy Food Choices
    Thorndike, Anne N.
    Riis, Jason
    Sonnenberg, Lillian M.
    Levy, Douglas E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [24] The effects of traffic light labels and involvement on consumer choices for food and financial products
    Drescher, Larissa S.
    Roosen, Jutta
    Marette, Stephan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2014, 38 (03) : 217 - 227
  • [25] Effectiveness of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels among Italian Consumers: Results from an Online Randomized Controlled Trial
    Fialon, Morgane
    Egnell, Manon
    Talati, Zenobia
    Galan, Pilar
    Dreano-Trecant, Louise
    Touvier, Mathilde
    Pettigrew, Simone
    Hercberg, Serge
    Julia, Chantal
    NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (08) : 1 - 13
  • [26] Stepping up versus standard doses of erythropoietin in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial
    Gumy-Pause, F
    Ozsahin, H
    Mermillod, B
    Cingria, L
    Berner, M
    Wacker, P
    PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 22 (08) : 667 - 678
  • [27] Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography in the work-up for subfertility: a randomized controlled trial
    van Kessel, Mianne
    Tros, Rachel
    van Kuijk, Sander
    Oosterhuis, Jur
    Kuchenbecker, Walter
    Bongers, Marlies
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Koks, Carolien
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 43 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [28] Broad-Spectrum Light versus Blue Light for Phototherapy in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pratesi, Simone
    Di Fabio, Sandra
    Bresci, Cecilia
    Di Natale, Cecilia
    Bar, Shahar
    Dani, Carlo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 32 (08) : 779 - 784
  • [29] Impact of red versus blue light on tolerability and efficacy of PDT: a randomized controlled trial
    Gholam, Patrick
    Bosselmann, Ina
    Enk, Alexander
    Fink, Christine
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2018, 16 (06): : 711 - 718
  • [30] The impact of generic labels on the consumption of and adherence to medication: a randomized controlled trial
    Goldszmidt, Rafael B.
    Buttendorf, Andre R.
    Schuldt Filho, Guenther
    Souza, Jose M., Jr.
    Bianchini, Marco A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29 (01): : 12 - 17