Risk of Incisional Hernia after Minimally Invasive and Open Radical Prostatectomy

被引:22
|
作者
Carlsson, Sigrid V. [1 ,3 ]
Ehdaie, Behfar [1 ,2 ]
Atoria, Coral L. [2 ]
Elkin, Elena B. [2 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2013年 / 190卷 / 05期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; surgical procedures; minimally invasive; intraoperative complications; PORT-SITE HERNIAS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; INGUINAL-HERNIA; FASCIAL CLOSURE; UNITED-STATES; MEDICARE DATA; CANCER; LAPAROTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.036
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The number of radical prostatectomies has increased. Many urologists have shifted from the open surgical approach to minimally invasive techniques. It is not clear whether the risk of post-prostatectomy incisional hernia varies by surgical approach. Materials and Methods: In the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data set we identified men 66 years old or older who were treated with minimally invasive or open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer diagnosed from 2003 to 2007. The main study outcome was incisional hernia repair, as identified in Medicare claims after prostatectomy. We also examined the frequency of umbilical, inguinal and other hernia repairs. Results: We identified 3,199 and 6,795 patients who underwent minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy, respectively. The frequency of incisional hernia repair was 5.3% at a median 3.1-year followup in the minimally invasive group and 1.9% at a 4.4-year median followup in the open group, corresponding to an incidence rate of 16.1 and 4.5/1,000 person-years, respectively. Compared to the open technique, the minimally invasive procedure was associated with more than a threefold increased risk of incisional hernia repair when controlling for patient and disease characteristics (adjusted HR 3.39, 95% CI 2.63-4.38, p < 0.0001). Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy was associated with an attenuated but increased risk of any hernia repair compared with open radical prostatectomy (adjusted HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.29e1.70, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy was associated with a significantly increased risk of incisional hernia compared with open radical prostatectomy. This is a potentially remediable complication of prostate cancer surgery that warrants increased vigilance with respect to surgical technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1757 / 1762
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The prevention of extraction site incisional hernia after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    David P. Feng
    Amy N. Luckenbaugh
    Zuliang Feng
    Sam S. Chang
    Joseph A. Smith
    David F. Penson
    Daniel A. Barocas
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 315 - 317
  • [32] Surgical Complications Requiring Intervention in Open versus Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy
    Haeuser, Lorine
    Reese, Stephen W.
    Paciotti, Marco
    Noldus, Joachim
    Brovman, Ethan Y.
    Urman, Richard D.
    Cone, Eugene B.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, 106 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [33] Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy Editorial Comment
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (06): : 2234 - 2235
  • [34] Rate of incisional hernia after minimally invasive and open surgery for renal cell carcinoma: a nationwide population-based study
    Hermann, Maria
    Gustafsson, Ove
    Sundqvist, Pernilla
    Sandblom, Gabriel
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 55 (05) : 372 - 376
  • [35] Minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: comparing apples and pears?
    Joniau, Steven
    Tosco, Lorenzo
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Spahn, Martin
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (06) : 711 - 712
  • [36] Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Mullins, Jeffrey K.
    Eifler, John B.
    Voth, Kipp
    Hyams, Elias S.
    Han, Misop
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (06) : 751 - 757
  • [37] Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Prasad, Michaella M.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Wang, Qin
    Pashos, Chris L.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 4 - 5
  • [38] SURGEON ADOPTION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Anderson, Christopher
    Atoria, Coral
    Touijer, Karim
    Eastham, James
    Elkin, Elena
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E16 - E16
  • [39] Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Hu, Jim C.
    Wang, Qin
    Pashos, Chris L.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (14) : 2278 - 2284
  • [40] The Impact of Surgical Technique on Unplanned Reoperation after Open and Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis of the NSQIP Database
    Sarhan, Ahmed
    Shabsigh, Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 221 (04) : S174 - S174