Risk of Incisional Hernia after Minimally Invasive and Open Radical Prostatectomy

被引:22
|
作者
Carlsson, Sigrid V. [1 ,3 ]
Ehdaie, Behfar [1 ,2 ]
Atoria, Coral L. [2 ]
Elkin, Elena B. [2 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2013年 / 190卷 / 05期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; surgical procedures; minimally invasive; intraoperative complications; PORT-SITE HERNIAS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; INGUINAL-HERNIA; FASCIAL CLOSURE; UNITED-STATES; MEDICARE DATA; CANCER; LAPAROTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.036
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The number of radical prostatectomies has increased. Many urologists have shifted from the open surgical approach to minimally invasive techniques. It is not clear whether the risk of post-prostatectomy incisional hernia varies by surgical approach. Materials and Methods: In the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data set we identified men 66 years old or older who were treated with minimally invasive or open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer diagnosed from 2003 to 2007. The main study outcome was incisional hernia repair, as identified in Medicare claims after prostatectomy. We also examined the frequency of umbilical, inguinal and other hernia repairs. Results: We identified 3,199 and 6,795 patients who underwent minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy, respectively. The frequency of incisional hernia repair was 5.3% at a median 3.1-year followup in the minimally invasive group and 1.9% at a 4.4-year median followup in the open group, corresponding to an incidence rate of 16.1 and 4.5/1,000 person-years, respectively. Compared to the open technique, the minimally invasive procedure was associated with more than a threefold increased risk of incisional hernia repair when controlling for patient and disease characteristics (adjusted HR 3.39, 95% CI 2.63-4.38, p < 0.0001). Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy was associated with an attenuated but increased risk of any hernia repair compared with open radical prostatectomy (adjusted HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.29e1.70, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy was associated with a significantly increased risk of incisional hernia compared with open radical prostatectomy. This is a potentially remediable complication of prostate cancer surgery that warrants increased vigilance with respect to surgical technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1757 / 1762
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Re: Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Koupparis, Anthony J.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (06) : 1118 - 1119
  • [22] Re: Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy
    White, Ralph de Vere
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (02) : 355 - 356
  • [23] THE EFFECT OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SURGEON VOLUME ON OUTCOMES
    Carvas, Fernando
    Choi, Wesley
    Prasad, Sandip
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Lipsitz, Stuart
    D'Amico, Anthony
    Yin, Lei
    Freire, Marcos
    Weinberg, Aaron
    Hu, Jim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E285 - E285
  • [24] Re: Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Lowrance, William T.
    Elkin, Elena B.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) : 538 - 538
  • [25] PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF HAEMATOMATA AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Kirby, Roger
    Challacombe, Ben
    Patil, Krishna
    Amoroso, Peter
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Fitzpatrick, John M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (02) : 158 - 159
  • [26] Contemporary Management of Hemorrhage After Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy
    Dean, Lucas W.
    Tin, Amy L.
    Chesnut, Gregory T.
    Assel, Melissa
    LaDuke, Emily
    Fromkin, Jillian
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Coleman, Jonathan A.
    Touijer, Karim
    Eastham, James A.
    Laudone, Vincent P.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 130 : 120 - 125
  • [27] Open vs. minimally invasive sublay incisional hernia repair. Is there a risk of overtreatment? EVEREG registry analysis
    Lopez-Cano, Manuel
    Verdaguer Tremolosa, Mireia
    Hernandez Granados, Pilar
    Antonio Pereira, Jose
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2023, 101 : S46 - S53
  • [28] Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients
    Jonas Busch
    Ahmed Magheli
    Natalia Leva
    Stefan Hinz
    Michelle Ferrari
    Frank Friedersdorff
    Tom Florian Fuller
    Kurt Miller
    Mark L. Gonzalgo
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 1411 - 1416
  • [29] Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients
    Busch, Jonas
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Leva, Natalia
    Hinz, Stefan
    Ferrari, Michelle
    Friedersdorff, Frank
    Fuller, Tom Florian
    Miller, Kurt
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (06) : 1411 - 1416
  • [30] The prevention of extraction site incisional hernia after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Feng, David P.
    Luckenbaugh, Amy N.
    Feng, Zuliang
    Chang, Sam S.
    Smith, Joseph A.
    Penson, David F.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (02) : 315 - 317