Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics

被引:446
|
作者
Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe [1 ]
Walz, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Ecol Urban & Reg Dev, D-01217 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Landscape metrics; Service providing area (SPA); Service benefiting area (SBA); Service connecting area (SCA); Landscape structure; Ecosystem services; Landscape services; Sparial characteristics; EFFECTIVE MESH SIZE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; VALUATION; PAYMENTS; INDEX; CLASSIFICATION; CHALLENGES; ELEMENTS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The ecosystem services approach is an established framework for the balanced evaluation of ecological, economic and social landscape resources. It promotes functional synergies (win-win situations) as well as trade-offs among various benefits resulting from ecosystem processes. Spatial aspects of heterogeneity and configuration play a major role in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services and hence in human wellbeing. Cultural artifacts also contribute to landscape functionality. Because of the underlying areal aspects, an additional term, landscape service has been proposed and is increasingly used (Termorshuizen and Opdam. 2009). We take a particular interest in spatial aspects of this framework and the optimization of trade-offs between landscape services. Firstly, spatial heterogeneity is assessed by means of landscape metrics computed as indicators for landscape services. Landscape heterogeneity is a key measure of biodiversity and contributes to several valuable functions. Habitat connectivity and other measures of landscape structure are also essential criteria for the behavior of metapopulations and for recreational value. Secondly, service providing areas (SPAs) are discussed as the areal basis for service provision. Similarly, service benefiting areas (SBAs) and connecting areas (SCAs) for the transfer of matter, energy and organisms between them are investigated. Place-based assessment addresses such areas. We thus show possibilities for estimating and evaluating landscape units. Thirdly, the landscape consists of the natural environment, artifacts from past human use, current human activity and even social thinking. The landscape services approach in a wider sense allows us to take social/cultural services better into account because they depend strongly on heritage assets, structural characteristics, historical conditions end even cultural specifics; which can hardly be subsumed to ecosystems. Place-based assessment is an appropriate solution for combining several spatial categories. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Microbial Indicators of Urban Soils and Their Role in the Assessment of Ecosystem Services: a Review
    N. D. Ananyeva
    K. V. Ivashchenko
    S. V. Sushko
    Eurasian Soil Science, 2021, 54 : 1517 - 1531
  • [42] Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment
    Christian K. Feld
    José Paulo Sousa
    Pedro Martins da Silva
    Terence P. Dawson
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 2895 - 2919
  • [43] Dataset of Indicators for the Assessment of Ecosystem Services Affected by Agricultural Soil Management
    Paul, Carsten
    Donmez, Cenk
    Koeppe, Petra
    Robinson, James S.
    Barnickel, Sonja
    DATA, 2022, 7 (08)
  • [44] Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment
    Feld, Christian K.
    Sousa, Jose Paulo
    da Silva, Pedro Martins
    Dawson, Terence P.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2895 - 2919
  • [45] Microbial Indicators of Urban Soils and Their Role in the Assessment of Ecosystem Services: a Review
    Ananyeva, N. D.
    Ivashchenko, K., V
    Sushko, S., V
    EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2021, 54 (10) : 1517 - 1531
  • [46] An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands
    Kroeger, Timm
    Casey, Frank
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 64 (02) : 321 - 332
  • [47] Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ES-in-Planning framework
    Albert, Christian
    Galler, Carolin
    Hermes, Johannes
    Neuendorf, Felix
    von Haaren, Christina
    Lovett, Andrew
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 100 - 113
  • [48] Implications of landscape changes for ecosystem services and biodiversity: A national assessment in Ecuador
    Koo, Hongmi
    Kleemann, Janina
    Cuenca, Pablo
    Noh, Jin Kyoung
    Fuerst, Christine
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 69
  • [49] THE ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE FRAGMENTATION IN AN AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENT: DEGRADATION OR CONTRIBUTION TO ECOSYSTEM SERVICES?
    Gulcin, Derya
    Yilmaz, K. Tuluhan
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2017, 26 (12A): : 326 - 335
  • [50] Assessment of ecosystem services value in Linghekou wetland based on landscape change
    Cheng, Qian
    Zhou, Linfei
    Wang, Tieliang
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2022, 15