Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics

被引:446
|
作者
Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe [1 ]
Walz, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Ecol Urban & Reg Dev, D-01217 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Landscape metrics; Service providing area (SPA); Service benefiting area (SBA); Service connecting area (SCA); Landscape structure; Ecosystem services; Landscape services; Sparial characteristics; EFFECTIVE MESH SIZE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; VALUATION; PAYMENTS; INDEX; CLASSIFICATION; CHALLENGES; ELEMENTS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The ecosystem services approach is an established framework for the balanced evaluation of ecological, economic and social landscape resources. It promotes functional synergies (win-win situations) as well as trade-offs among various benefits resulting from ecosystem processes. Spatial aspects of heterogeneity and configuration play a major role in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services and hence in human wellbeing. Cultural artifacts also contribute to landscape functionality. Because of the underlying areal aspects, an additional term, landscape service has been proposed and is increasingly used (Termorshuizen and Opdam. 2009). We take a particular interest in spatial aspects of this framework and the optimization of trade-offs between landscape services. Firstly, spatial heterogeneity is assessed by means of landscape metrics computed as indicators for landscape services. Landscape heterogeneity is a key measure of biodiversity and contributes to several valuable functions. Habitat connectivity and other measures of landscape structure are also essential criteria for the behavior of metapopulations and for recreational value. Secondly, service providing areas (SPAs) are discussed as the areal basis for service provision. Similarly, service benefiting areas (SBAs) and connecting areas (SCAs) for the transfer of matter, energy and organisms between them are investigated. Place-based assessment addresses such areas. We thus show possibilities for estimating and evaluating landscape units. Thirdly, the landscape consists of the natural environment, artifacts from past human use, current human activity and even social thinking. The landscape services approach in a wider sense allows us to take social/cultural services better into account because they depend strongly on heritage assets, structural characteristics, historical conditions end even cultural specifics; which can hardly be subsumed to ecosystems. Place-based assessment is an appropriate solution for combining several spatial categories. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Landscape metrics applied to formerly reclaimed saltmarshes: A tool to evaluate ecosystem services?
    Almeida, Diana
    Rocha, Jorge
    Neto, Carlos
    Arsenio, Pedro
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2016, 181 : 100 - 113
  • [22] Towards ecosystem service assessment: Developing biophysical indicators for forest ecosystem services
    Tiemann, Andre
    Ring, Irene
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 137
  • [23] Mapping cultural ecosystem services: Connecting visual landscape quality to cost estimations for enhanced services provision
    Ungaro, F.
    Haefner, K.
    Zasada, I.
    Piorr, A.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 54 : 399 - 412
  • [24] Ecosystem Indicators and Landscape Ecology Metrics as a Tool to Evaluate Sustainable Land Planning in ICZM
    Fiduccia, Andrea
    Cattozzo, Luisa
    Marotta, Leonardo
    Filesi, Leonardo
    Gugliermetti, Luca
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2019, PT III: 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA, JULY 1-4, 2019, PROCEEDINGS, PART III, 2019, 11621 : 561 - 576
  • [25] Regional ecosystem health assessment based on landscape patterns and ecosystem services approach
    Hasani, Mohammad
    Pielesiak, Iwona
    Mahiny, Abdolrassoul Salman
    Mikaeili, Alireza
    ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43 (02) : 333 - 342
  • [26] Spatial metrics for detecting ecosystem degradation in the ridge-slough patterned landscape
    Yuan, Jing
    Cohen, Matthew J.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 74 : 427 - 440
  • [27] Spatial metrics - useful indicators for society or mainly fun tools for landscape ecologists?
    Dramstad, Wenche E.
    NORSK GEOGRAFISK TIDSSKRIFT-NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 63 (04) : 246 - 254
  • [28] Assessment of Spatial Patterns of Backyard Shacks Using Landscape Metrics
    Mudau, Naledzani
    Mhangara, Paidamwoyo
    DRONES, 2023, 7 (09)
  • [29] Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales
    Feld, Christian K.
    da Silva, Pedro Martins
    Sousa, Jose Paulo
    de Bello, Francesco
    Bugter, Rob
    Grandin, Ulf
    Hering, Daniel
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Mountford, Owen
    Pardo, Isabel
    Paertel, Meelis
    Roembke, Joerg
    Sandin, Leonard
    Jones, K. Bruce
    Harrison, Paula
    OIKOS, 2009, 118 (12) : 1862 - 1871
  • [30] Relationship Between Spatial Datasets and Assessments of Mapped Ecosystem Services Indicators
    Holms, Jurijs
    Arhipova, Irina
    Vitols, Gatis
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING, 2019, 7 (01): : 1 - 18