Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics

被引:446
|
作者
Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe [1 ]
Walz, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Ecol Urban & Reg Dev, D-01217 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Landscape metrics; Service providing area (SPA); Service benefiting area (SBA); Service connecting area (SCA); Landscape structure; Ecosystem services; Landscape services; Sparial characteristics; EFFECTIVE MESH SIZE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; VALUATION; PAYMENTS; INDEX; CLASSIFICATION; CHALLENGES; ELEMENTS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The ecosystem services approach is an established framework for the balanced evaluation of ecological, economic and social landscape resources. It promotes functional synergies (win-win situations) as well as trade-offs among various benefits resulting from ecosystem processes. Spatial aspects of heterogeneity and configuration play a major role in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services and hence in human wellbeing. Cultural artifacts also contribute to landscape functionality. Because of the underlying areal aspects, an additional term, landscape service has been proposed and is increasingly used (Termorshuizen and Opdam. 2009). We take a particular interest in spatial aspects of this framework and the optimization of trade-offs between landscape services. Firstly, spatial heterogeneity is assessed by means of landscape metrics computed as indicators for landscape services. Landscape heterogeneity is a key measure of biodiversity and contributes to several valuable functions. Habitat connectivity and other measures of landscape structure are also essential criteria for the behavior of metapopulations and for recreational value. Secondly, service providing areas (SPAs) are discussed as the areal basis for service provision. Similarly, service benefiting areas (SBAs) and connecting areas (SCAs) for the transfer of matter, energy and organisms between them are investigated. Place-based assessment addresses such areas. We thus show possibilities for estimating and evaluating landscape units. Thirdly, the landscape consists of the natural environment, artifacts from past human use, current human activity and even social thinking. The landscape services approach in a wider sense allows us to take social/cultural services better into account because they depend strongly on heritage assets, structural characteristics, historical conditions end even cultural specifics; which can hardly be subsumed to ecosystems. Place-based assessment is an appropriate solution for combining several spatial categories. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Quantitative Study on the Identification of Ecosystem Services: Providing and Connecting Areas and Their Impact on Ecosystem Service Assessment
    Liu, Qing
    Du, Guoming
    Liu, Haijiao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [2] Spatial coupling and decoupling between ecosystem services provisioning and benefiting areas: Implications for marine spatial planning
    Vergara, X.
    Carmona, A.
    Nahuelhual, L.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 203
  • [3] Recreation potential assessment at large spatial scales: A method based in the ecosystem services approach and landscape metrics
    Weyland, Federico
    Laterra, Pedro
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 39 : 34 - 43
  • [4] Integrating landscape ecology and the assessment of ecosystem services in the study of karst areas
    Claudia Canedoli
    Gentile Francesco Ficetola
    Davide Corengia
    Paola Tognini
    Andrea Ferrario
    Emilio Padoa-Schioppa
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 347 - 365
  • [5] Integrating landscape ecology and the assessment of ecosystem services in the study of karst areas
    Canedoli, Claudia
    Ficetola, Gentile Francesco
    Corengia, Davide
    Tognini, Paola
    Ferrario, Andrea
    Padoa-Schioppa, Emilio
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (01) : 347 - 365
  • [6] Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review
    Uuemaa, Evelyn
    Mander, Uelo
    Marja, Riho
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 28 : 100 - 106
  • [7] Landscape indicators - Monitoring of biodiversity and ecosystem services at landscape level
    Walz, Ulrich
    Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 94 : 1 - 5
  • [8] Social mapping of perceived ecosystem services supply - The role of social landscape metrics and social hotspots for integrated ecosystem services assessment, landscape planning and management
    De Vreesea, Rik
    Leys, M.
    Fontaine, C. M.
    Dendoncker, N.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 : 517 - 533
  • [9] PLANTATION OF ENERGY PLANTS AS AN ELEMENT OF THE LANDSCAPE PROVIDING THE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
    Kotrla, Marian
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 16 (01) : 239 - 244
  • [10] Spatial correlograms and landscape metrics as indicators of land use changes
    Aunap, R.
    Uuemaa, E.
    Roosaare, J.
    Mander, Ue.
    GEO-ENVIRONMENT AND LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION II: EVOLUTION, MONITORING, SIMULATION, MANAGEMENT AND REMEDIATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT AND LANDSCAPE, 2006, 89 : 305 - +