Development and evaluation of a national gentamicin and vancomycin quality improvement programme

被引:4
|
作者
Semple, Yvonne [1 ,2 ]
Bennie, Marion [1 ,3 ]
Sneddon, Jacqueline [4 ]
Cockburn, Alison [5 ]
Seaton, R. Andrew [4 ,6 ]
Thomson, Alison H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Inst Pharm & Biomed Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] NHS Golden Jubilee Hosp, Pharm Dept, Clydebank, Scotland
[3] NHS Natl Serv Scotland, Informat Serv Div, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Grp, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Western Gen Hosp, Reg Infect Dis Unit, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Queen Elizabeth Univ Hosp, Infect Dis Unit, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
PRACTICE GUIDELINES; BARRIERS; DOSAGE;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkaa096
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group (SAPG) recommendations to reduce broad-spectrum antimicrobial use led to an increase in gentamicin and vancomycin prescribing. In 2009, SAPG introduced national guidance to standardize dosage regimens, reduce calculation errors and improve the monitoring of these antibiotics. Studies conducted in 2010 and 2011 identified limitations in guideline implementation. Objectives: To develop, implement and assess the long-term impact of quality improvement (QI) resources to support gentamicin and vancomycin prescribing, administration and monitoring. Methods: New resources, comprising revised guidelines, online and mobile app dose calculators, educational material and specialized prescribing and monitoring charts were developed in collaboration with antimicrobial specialists and implemented throughout Scotland during 2013-16. An online survey in 2017 evaluated the use of these resources and a before (2011) and after (2018) point prevalence study assessed their impact. Results: All 12 boards who responded to the survey (80%) were using the guidance, electronic calculators and gentamicin prescription chart; 8 used a vancomycin chart. The percentage of patients who received the recommended gentamicin dose increased from 44% to 89% (OR 10.99, 95% CI=6.37-18.95) between 2011 and 2018. For vancomycin, the correct loading dose increased from 50% to 85% (OR=5.69, CI=2.76-11.71) and the correct maintenance dose from 55% to 90% (OR=7.17, CI=3.01-17.07). Conclusions: This study demonstrated improvements in the national prescribing of gentamicin and vancomycin through the development and coordinated implementation of a range of QI resources and engagement with local and national multidisciplinary teams.
引用
收藏
页码:1998 / 2003
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality improvement and accountability in the treatment of tobacco dependence: the need for a national training and certification programme
    Davis, RM
    Slade, J
    Ferry, LH
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2000, 9 (04) : 355 - 358
  • [32] The effect and process evaluations of the national quality improvement programme for palliative care: the study protocol
    Natasja JH Raijmakers
    Jolien M Hofstede
    Ellen JM de Nijs
    Luc Deliens
    Anneke L Francke
    [J]. BMC Palliative Care, 13
  • [33] Implementation and evaluation of a national quality improvement initiative in cancer surgery
    Arnaout, Angel
    Mukhi, Shaheena
    Brehaut, Jamie
    Davidson, Sarah
    Fung, Michael Fung Kee
    Hebbard, Pamela
    Hillis, Christopher
    Leonard, Robyn
    Mack, Lloyd A.
    Mathieson, Alex
    Presseau, Justin
    Schaeffer, David
    Seely, Andrew
    Stuart, Gavin
    Tesch, Marvin
    Westhuizen, Nicholas
    Earle, Craig
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [34] SWOT analysis of a pediatric rehabilitation programme: A participatory evaluation fostering quality improvement
    Camden, Chantal
    Swaine, Bonnie
    Tetreault, Sylvie
    Bergeron, Sophie
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 31 (16) : 1373 - 1381
  • [35] Evaluation of the Irish National COPD Collaborative Quality Improvement Initiative
    Woods, O.
    Prihodova, L.
    MacDonell, R.
    Brennan, J.
    Costello, R.
    McDonnell, T.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 (SUPPL 10) : 301 - 301
  • [36] Evaluation of a National Quality Improvement Collaborative for Improving Cancer Screening
    Joung, Rachel Hae-Soo
    Mullett, Timothy W.
    Kurtzman, Scott H.
    Shafir, Sarah
    Harris, James B.
    Yao, Katharine A.
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Cance, William G.
    Nelson, Heidi
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (11) : E2242354
  • [37] Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol
    Wagstaff, Duncan
    Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
    Fulop, Naomi J.
    Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [38] A quality improvement programme in a neurovascular clinic
    McCarron, M. O.
    Mckee, J.
    Wade, C.
    Loftus, A. M.
    [J]. CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 37 : 674 - 674
  • [39] FLOZINATION: A ROLLING QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME
    Gillis, Keith
    Birch-Machin, Samuel
    Russell, Catherine
    Fairweather, Jack
    Spalding, Elaine
    Lees, Jennifer
    Mcquarrie, Emily
    Mark, Patrick
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I655 - I656
  • [40] TOTAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME.
    Doran, Peter K.
    [J]. Quality assurance London, 1985, 11 (04): : 106 - 109