Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care

被引:10
|
作者
Gude, Wouter T. [1 ]
Roos-Blom, Marie-Jose [1 ,3 ]
van der Veer, Sabine N. [4 ]
Dongelmans, Dave A. [2 ]
de Jonge, Evert [5 ]
Peek, Niels [4 ,6 ]
de Keizer, Nicolette F. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Med Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Intens Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Natl Intens Care Evaluat NICE Fdn, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Ctr Hlth Informat,Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safe, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Intensive care; Medical audit; Feedback; Quality improvement; Quality indicators; IMPROVE; QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-019-0937-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Audit and feedback (A&F) is more effective if it facilitates action planning, but little is known about how best to do this. We developed an electronic A&F intervention with an action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care units (ICUs); the toolbox contained suggested actions for improvement. A head-to-head randomised trial demonstrated that the toolbox moderately increased the intervention's effectiveness when compared with A&F only. Objective: To understand the mechanisms through which A&F with action implementation toolbox facilitates action planning by ICUs to increase A&F effectiveness. Methods: We extracted all individual actions from action plans developed by ICUs that received A&F with (n = 10) and without (n = 11) toolbox for 6 months and classified them using Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. We held semi-structured interviews with participants during the trial. We compared the number and type of planned and completed actions between study groups and explored barriers and facilitators to effective action planning. Results: ICUs with toolbox planned more actions directly aimed at improving practice (p = 0.037) and targeted a wider range of practice determinants compared to ICUs without toolbox. ICUs with toolbox also completed more actions during the study period, but not significantly (p = 0.142). ICUs without toolbox reported more difficulties in identifying what actions they could take. Regardless of the toolbox, all ICUs still experienced barriers relating to the feedback (low controllability, accuracy) and organisational context (competing priorities, resources, cost). Conclusions: The toolbox helped health professionals to broaden their mindset about actions they could take to change clinical practice. Without the toolbox, professionals tended to focus more on feedback verification and exploring solutions without developing intentions for actual change. All feedback recipients experienced organisational barriers that inhibited eventual completion of actions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multifaceted intervention to increase the delivery of alcohol brief interventions in primary care: a mixed-methods process analysis
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth
    Advocat, Jenny
    Lam, Tina
    Nielsen, Suzanne
    Ball, Lauren
    Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
    Martin, Catherine
    Barton, Chris
    Tam, Chun Wah Michael
    Skouteris, Helen
    Mazza, Danielle
    Russell, Grant
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73 (735): : e778 - e788
  • [22] Determinants of inter-organizational implementation success: A mixed-methods evaluation of Veteran Directed Care
    Sperber, Nina R.
    Miech, Edward J.
    Clary, Alecia Slade
    Perry, Kathleen
    Edwards-Orr, Merle
    Rudolph, James L.
    Van Houtven, Courtney Harold
    Thomas, Kali S.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION, 2022, 10 (04):
  • [23] Implementation and evaluation of the WHO maternity care model: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol
    Abdolalipour, Somayeh
    Abbasalizadeh, Shamsi
    Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Sakineh
    Abbasalizadeh, Fatemeh
    Jahanfar, Shayesteh
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 5
  • [24] A mixed-methods evaluation of home-based primary care in dementia within an integrated system
    Nguyen, Huong Q.
    Vallejo, Jessica D.
    Macias, Mayra
    Shiffman, Maricela Garcia
    Rosen, Romina
    Mowry, Velda
    Omotunde, Omotayo
    Hong, Benjamin
    Liu, In-Lu Amy
    Borson, Soo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2022, 70 (04) : 1136 - 1146
  • [25] Providing psychological consultation within children's social care: a mixed-methods service evaluation
    Clare, Robyn
    Jackson-Blott, Kim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2023, 37 (01) : 45 - 62
  • [26] Policy action points and approaches to promote fertility care in The Gambia: Findings from a mixed-methods study
    Afferri, Anna
    Dierickx, Susan
    Bittaye, Mustapha
    Marena, Musa
    Pacey, Allan Antony
    Balen, Julie
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [27] Effect and implementation experience of intensive adherence counseling in a public HIV care center in Uganda: a mixed-methods study
    Zubair Lukyamuzi
    Samuel Etajak
    Thomas Katairo
    David Mukunya
    Moses Tetui
    Aloysius Ssenyonjo
    Rhoda K. Wanyenze
    [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 21
  • [28] Effect and implementation experience of intensive adherence counseling in a public HIV care center in Uganda: a mixed-methods study
    Lukyamuzi, Zubair
    Etajak, Samuel
    Katairo, Thomas
    Mukunya, David
    Tetui, Moses
    Ssenyonjo, Aloysius
    Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [29] Integrating Patient Involvement Interventions within Clinical Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study of Health Care Professional Reasoning
    Holm, Anna
    Rodkjaer, Lotte Orneborg
    Bekker, Hilary Louise
    [J]. MDM POLICY & PRACTICE, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [30] Understanding the Implementation of "Sit Less at Work" Interventions in Three Organisations: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
    Mackenzie, Kelly
    Such, Elizabeth
    Norman, Paul
    Goyder, Elizabeth
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)