Integrating Patient Involvement Interventions within Clinical Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study of Health Care Professional Reasoning

被引:0
|
作者
Holm, Anna [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ,7 ]
Rodkjaer, Lotte Orneborg [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Bekker, Hilary Louise [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Res Ctr Patient Involvement, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Skejby, Denmark
[5] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds Unit Complex Intervent Dev LUCID, Leeds, England
[6] Aarhus Univ, Res Ctr Patient Involvement, Dept Publ Hlth, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-810 Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-810 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
clinical practice; clinical reasoning; implementation; person-centred communication; patient involvement; SHARED DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1177/23814683241229987
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Patient involvement interventions are complex interventions that improve patient involvement in treatment and care in health care systems. Studies report several benefits of patient involvement interventions and that health care professionals are positive about using them. However, they have not been explored as a collected group of interventions throughout the continuum of care and treatment. In addition, the relationship between patient involvement interventions and the clinical reasoning process of health care professionals has not been thoroughly studied. Design. This mixed-methods study was conducted at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark between April and November 2022 using interview data from 12 health care professionals and survey data from 420 health care professionals. Informants were medical doctors, nurses, midwives, dietitians, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists who had direct contact with patients during their daily care and treatment. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were analyzed via inductive and deductive content analysis. Results. Communication and interaction were seen as overarching aspects of patient involvement, with patient involvement interventions being defined as concrete tools and methods to enhance health care professionals' explicit clinical reasoning process. Limitations. It is unclear if results are representative of all health care professionals at the hospital or only those with a positive view of patient involvement interventions. Conclusions. Patient involvement interventions are viewed as beneficial for patients and fit with the clinical reasoning of health care professionals. Clinical reasoning may be an active ingredient in the development and implementation of patient involvement interventions. Implications. In practice, health care professionals need training in person-centered communication and the ability to articulate their clinical reasoning explicitly. In research, a more in-depth understanding of the interrelations between patient involvement interventions and clinical reasoning is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing patient reference groups within general practice: a mixed-methods study
    Smiddy, Jane
    Reay, Joanne
    Peckham, Stephen
    Williams, Lorraine
    Wilson, Patricia
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2015, 65 (632): : E177 - E183
  • [2] Integration of Mental Health Interventions Within PBIS: a Mixed-Methods Analysis
    Eiraldi, Ricardo
    Lawson, Gwendolyn M.
    Patel, Ami
    Mccurdy, Barry L.
    Wolk, Courtney Benjamin
    Khanna, Muniya S.
    Jawad, Abbas F.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023,
  • [3] Patient and public involvement in randomised clinical trials: a mixed-methods study of a clinical trials unit to identify good practice, barriers and facilitators
    Lucy Ellen Selman
    Clare Clement
    Margaret Douglas
    Keith Douglas
    Jodi Taylor
    Chris Metcalfe
    J. Athene Lane
    Jeremy Horwood
    [J]. Trials, 22
  • [4] Patient and public involvement in randomised clinical trials: a mixed-methods study of a clinical trials unit to identify good practice, barriers and facilitators
    Selman, Lucy Ellen
    Clement, Clare
    Douglas, Margaret
    Douglas, Keith
    Taylor, Jodi
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Lane, J. Athene
    Horwood, Jeremy
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [5] Mixed-Methods Survey of Professional Perspectives of Music Therapy Practice in Mental Health
    Eyre, Lillian
    Lee, Jin-Hyung
    [J]. MUSIC THERAPY PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 33 (02) : 162 - 181
  • [6] INTEGRATING COST-OF-CARE CONVERSATIONS WITHIN THE CLINICAL SETTING: MIXED METHODS STUDY
    Banegas, Matthew P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S486 - S486
  • [7] Frequent attenders in primary health care: a mixed-methods study of patient and staff perspectives
    Sharabani, Rachel
    Kagan, Ilya
    Cojocaru, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (19-20) : 7135 - 7146
  • [8] Translating a walking intervention for health professional delivery within primary care: A mixed-methods treatment fidelity assessment
    Williams, Stefanie L.
    McSharry, Jennifer
    Taylor, Claire
    Dale, Jeremy
    Michie, Susan
    French, David P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 25 (01) : 17 - 38
  • [9] Nursing technicians' professional training in patient safety: A mixed-methods study
    Rocha, Ruth Cardoso
    Avelino, Fernanda Valeria Silva Dantas
    Borges, Jose Wicto Pereira
    Araujo, Agostinho Antonio Cruz
    Bezerra, Maria Augusta Rocha
    Nunes, Benevina Maria Vilar Teixeira
    [J]. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 31
  • [10] Experiences of veterinarians in clinical behavior practice: A mixed-methods study
    Ballantyne, Kelly C.
    Buller, Kristin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10 (05) : 376 - 383