Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm

被引:16
|
作者
Fischer, Rico [1 ]
Schubert, Torsten [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Psychol 1, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, D-1086 Berlin, Germany
关键词
psychological refractory period; Eriksen-flanker paradigm; valence judgment; semantic category activation;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169.55.3.203
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The activation of semantic categories has often been claimed to occur in an attention-free, unconditionally automatic fashion (e. g., Bargh & Chartrand, 1999; Ferguson & Bargh, 2004). Using a dual-task procedure we tested whether the activation of valence categories is restricted by dual-task specific attentional limitations. For this reason we implemented a modified Eriksen-flanker task as Task 2 in a psychological refractory period paradigm. Participants were to judge the frequency of a tone in Task 1 and the valence of a target word in the presence of irrelevant flanker words in Task 2. Two different flanker categories ensured the activation of semantic categories instead of S-R based response activation. The most important result was an underadditive interaction between flanker congruency and the amount of temporal overlap between tasks that was independent of flanker type. Following the locus-of-slack logic, we interpret these findings as evidence for Task 2 processing parallel to bottleneck-stage processing in Task 1. This extends previous findings by showing that not only number categories (Fischer, Schubert, & Miller, 2007; Oriet, Tombu, & Jolicouer, 2005), but also semantic valence categories can be activated despite dual-task capacity limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 211
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm
    Luria, R
    Meiran, N
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2003, 29 (03) : 556 - 574
  • [32] A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period
    Marti, Sebastien
    Sigman, Mariano
    Dehaene, Stanislas
    NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 59 (03) : 2883 - 2898
  • [33] On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies
    Miller, Jeff
    Ulrich, Rolf
    Rolke, Bettina
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 58 (03) : 273 - 310
  • [34] Practice and fractionated reaction time in the psychological refractory period paradigm
    Guan, HW
    Koceja, D
    Surburg, P
    Morris, HH
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2005, 76 (01) : A56 - A57
  • [35] Prolonged Processing Time for Manual and Vocal Responses in Parkinson Disease: A Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm Study
    Reif, Angela E.
    Summers, Dale K.
    Whitfield, Jason A.
    Goberman, Alexander M.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2023, 66 (02): : 461 - 474
  • [36] Dual route for subtask order control: Evidence from the psychological refractory paradigm
    Luria, R
    Meiran, N
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (04): : 720 - 744
  • [37] RAPID RESPONSE SEQUENCES AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD
    Vince, Margaret A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL SECTION, 1949, 40 : 23 - 40
  • [38] Neuromuscular and cognitive factors delay responses in the psychological refractory period paradigm
    Guan, H
    Morris, H
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 26 : S84 - S84
  • [39] Features of perception: Exploring the perception of change in a psychological refractory period paradigm
    Richards, E
    Tombu, M
    Stolz, JA
    Jolicoeur, P
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2004, 11 (06) : 751 - 780
  • [40] Isolating Component Processes of Posterror Slowing With the Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm
    Steinhauser, Marco
    Ernst, Benjamin
    Ibald, Kevin W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (04) : 653 - 659