Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm

被引:16
|
作者
Fischer, Rico [1 ]
Schubert, Torsten [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Psychol 1, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, D-1086 Berlin, Germany
关键词
psychological refractory period; Eriksen-flanker paradigm; valence judgment; semantic category activation;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169.55.3.203
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The activation of semantic categories has often been claimed to occur in an attention-free, unconditionally automatic fashion (e. g., Bargh & Chartrand, 1999; Ferguson & Bargh, 2004). Using a dual-task procedure we tested whether the activation of valence categories is restricted by dual-task specific attentional limitations. For this reason we implemented a modified Eriksen-flanker task as Task 2 in a psychological refractory period paradigm. Participants were to judge the frequency of a tone in Task 1 and the valence of a target word in the presence of irrelevant flanker words in Task 2. Two different flanker categories ensured the activation of semantic categories instead of S-R based response activation. The most important result was an underadditive interaction between flanker congruency and the amount of temporal overlap between tasks that was independent of flanker type. Following the locus-of-slack logic, we interpret these findings as evidence for Task 2 processing parallel to bottleneck-stage processing in Task 1. This extends previous findings by showing that not only number categories (Fischer, Schubert, & Miller, 2007; Oriet, Tombu, & Jolicouer, 2005), but also semantic valence categories can be activated despite dual-task capacity limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 211
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm
    Miller, J
    Reynolds, A
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2003, 29 (06) : 1126 - 1142
  • [22] Global–local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm
    Skaiste G. Kerusauskaite
    Luca Simione
    Antonino Raffone
    Narayanan Srinivasan
    Experimental Brain Research, 2020, 238 : 345 - 354
  • [23] Training Effects in the Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm
    Danis, Lila Kathryn
    Thomson, Sandra J.
    Watter, Scott
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2012, 66 (04): : 305 - 305
  • [24] Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: Models and contamination effects
    Ulrich, Rolf
    Miller, Jeff
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (02) : 75 - 121
  • [25] Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: Effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period
    Maslovat, Dana
    Chua, Romeo
    Spencer, Hunter C.
    Forgaard, Chris J.
    Carlsen, Anthony N.
    Franks, Ian M.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 35 : S41 - S41
  • [26] Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: Effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period
    Maslovat, Dana
    Chua, Romeo
    Spencer, Hunter C.
    Forgaard, Christopher J.
    Carlsen, Anthony N.
    Franks, Ian M.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 144 (03) : 481 - 487
  • [27] PARALLEL PROCESSING AND PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD
    MCLEOD, P
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1977, 41 (05) : 381 - 396
  • [28] Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm
    Kerusauskaite, Skaiste G.
    Simione, Luca
    Raffone, Antonino
    Srinivasan, Narayanan
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 238 (02) : 345 - 354
  • [29] Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection
    Mei-Ching Lien
    Robert W. Proctor
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2002, 9 : 212 - 238
  • [30] Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection
    Lien, MC
    Proctor, RW
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2002, 9 (02) : 212 - 238