Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading

被引:33
|
作者
Su, Chun-Qiu [1 ]
Lu, Shan-Shan [1 ]
Han, Qiu-Yue [1 ]
Zhou, Mao-Dong [1 ]
Hong, Xun-Ning [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guang Zhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Glioma; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; susceptibility weighted imaging; texture analysis; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; PERFUSION MRI; GLIOBLASTOMA; PARAMETERS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1177/0284185118801127
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The application of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in glioma grading is limited and non-specific. Purpose To investigate the application values of MRI, texture analysis (TA) of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and intratumoral susceptibility signal (ITSS) on susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), alone and in combination, for glioma grading. Material and Methods Fifty-two patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas who underwent DCE-MRI and SWI were enrolled in this retrospective study. Conventional MRIs were evaluated by the VASARI scoring system. TA of DCE-MRI-derived parameters and the degree of ITSS were compared between low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The diagnostic ability of each parameter and their combination for glioma grading were analyzed. Results Significant statistical differences in VASARI features were observed between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.05), of which the enhancement quality had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.873) with 93.3% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The TA of DCE-MRI derived parameters were significantly different between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.05), of which the uniformity of K-trans had the highest AUC (0.917) with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The degree of ITSS was significantly different between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.001). The AUC of the ITSS was 0.925 with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The best discriminative power was obtained from a combination of enhancement quality, K-trans- uniformity, and ITSS, resulting in 96.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.993. Conclusion Combining conventional MRI, TA of DCE-MRI, and ITSS on SWI may help to improve the differentiation between LGGs and HGGs.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 787
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Characterization of Breast Tumors
    Kul, Sibel
    Cansu, Aysegul
    Alhan, Etem
    Dinc, Hasan
    Gunes, Gurbuz
    Reis, Abdulkadir
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) : 210 - 217
  • [32] An improved MRI method for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of tumors
    Ji, XQ
    Ma, JF
    Aref, M
    Wiener, E
    Liang, ZP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: A NEW BEGINNING FOR HUMAN HEALTH, 2003, 25 : 478 - 481
  • [33] Quantitative analysis of permeability for glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Zhao, Ming
    Guo, Li-Li
    Huang, Ning
    Wu, Qiong
    Zhou, Li
    Zhao, Hui
    Zhang, Jing
    Fu, Kuang
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 14 (05) : 5418 - 5426
  • [34] The Application of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients with Maxillofacial Tumors
    Kitamoto, Erina
    Chikui, Toru
    Kawano, Shintaro
    Ohga, Masahiro
    Kobayashi, Kouji
    Matsuo, Yoshio
    Yoshiura, Takashi
    Obara, Makoto
    Honda, Hiroshi
    Yoshiura, Kazunori
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) : 210 - 216
  • [35] Can cerebrovascular reactivity be assessed by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI?
    Berthezene, Y
    Nighoghossian, N
    Meyer, R
    Damien, J
    Cinotti, L
    Adeleine, P
    Trouillas, P
    Froment, JC
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 1998, 40 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [36] Can cerebrovascular reactivity be assessed by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI?
    Y. Berthezene
    N. Nighoghossian
    R. Meyer
    J. Damien
    L. Cinotti
    P. Adeleine
    P. Trouillas
    J. C. Froment
    Neuroradiology, 1998, 40 : 1 - 5
  • [37] A simple model for glioma grading based on texture analysis applied to conventional brain MRI
    Gerardo Suarez-Garcia, Jose
    Miguel Hernandez-Lopez, Javier
    Moreno-Barbosa, Eduardo
    de Celis-Alonso, Benito
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [38] Assessment of ameloblastomas using MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Asaumi, J
    Hisatomi, M
    Yanagi, Y
    Matsuzaki, H
    Choi, YS
    Kawai, N
    Konouchi, H
    Kishi, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 56 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [39] Improved T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to probe microvascularity and heterogeneity of human glioma
    Pauliah, Mohan
    Saxena, Vipin
    Haris, Mohammad
    Husain, Nuzhat
    Rathore, Ram Kishore S.
    Gupta, Rakesh K.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (09) : 1292 - 1299
  • [40] Prostate cancer detection with MRI: is dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging necessary in addition to diffusion-weighted imaging?
    Iwazawa, Jin
    Mitani, Takashi
    Sassa, Seitaro
    Ohue, Shoichi
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (03) : 243 - 248